Archive for the ‘American History’ Category

Location, location, location!

Monday, March 26th, 2012

Nothing says “home” quite like a map of Alaska and adjacent lands shown as Russian and British territory—with annotations in French! 

“Map showing Russian territory of Alaska and coastline of western Canada. Alaskan Boundary Tribunal” (1903). Source: U.S. Congressional Serial Set, Readex

Where would America be without maps? In cases where the United States purchased significant portions of its domain from other countries, the transactions would have been a hard sell without detailed maps showing boundaries, landmarks—and possibilities. Likewise for territory acquired in resolution of conflicts, maps were crucial in determining sovereignty and peaceable relations with potential adversaries. 

Consider the following map as a realtor might: Where would you put a fort? A port? Is the land timbered? Any navigable rivers? How’s the neighborhood? Can the previous owner offer clear title, or will there be a war? Will the financing come through? And after all that—is the acquisition constitutional? This is no place for buyer’s remorse!

“United States showing accessions of territory.” 1904. Source: U.S. Congressional Serial Set, Readex

Looking at things from such a personal, practical perspective gives one new appreciation for the courage of Thomas Jefferson, William H. Seward, and other public servants. In pursuing such breathtaking annexations as the 1803 Louisiana Purchase and “Seward’s Folly” in 1867, they have literally made America the place we call “home.”

Be Sociable, Share!

Announcing the digital edition of Washington, D.C.’s Evening Star, 1852-1922

Monday, March 19th, 2012

Old Evening Star Building on Pennsylvania Avenue, Washington, D.C. -- Source: Carol M. Highsmith Archive (Library of Congress)

This spring Readex will begin releasing a complete 70-year span of The Evening Star—one of the most influential newspapers in U.S. history. For more than a century, historians have regarded The Evening Star as the newspaper of record for the nation’s capital. Today, curators from leading newspaper repositories cite this long-running afternoon daily as one of their most heavily researched papers.

Man buying The Evening Star from newsboy -- Source: National Photo Company Collection (Library of Congress)

In digital form, this long-awaited archive of the Star will provide a searchable facsimile of every page of every issue from its founding on December 16, 1852 to December 31, 1922. Even in its earliest years, the Star was a conservative powerhouse, not afraid to buck Washington’s prevailing political winds. Its excellent reporting during the Civil War increased its popularity and circulation; even today Civil War historians frequently cite Star articles at length.

Students and scholars will have easy access to fresh perspectives on such topics as the Dred Scott decision, Lincoln assassination, founding of the first national association of unions and the National Woman Suffrage Association, establishment of the Civil Service, absorption of Georgetown into Washington, Supreme Court ruling of “separate but equal,” entry of American women into public life, passage of the Selective Service Act, segregation in the federal bureaucracy, and passage of both the 18th and 19th Amendments, which prohibited alcohol and gave women voting rights.

Headquarters, National American Woman Suffrage Association. Source: Harris & Ewing Collection (Library of Congress)

For more information about The Evening Star, or other American Newspaper Archives, please contact readexmarketing@readex.com.
 
Be Sociable, Share!

Readex announces Early American Newspapers, Series 8 and Series 9, 1832-1922

Thursday, March 15th, 2012

From Early American Newspapers, Series 9

This spring Readex will begin releasing two new series in its acclaimed Early American Newspapers collection. Early American Newspapers, Series 8 and Series 9 both feature full runs through 1922 of important, long-running titles from diverse regions of the United States. Each is notable for its depth of 19th- and early 20th-century news coverage, as exemplified by the large number of pages in every issue. Together, the titles in these two new series further expand the political, geographical and chronological depth of Early American Newspapers.  

From Early American Newspapers, Series 8

Series 8 provides many new titles of singular importance, including the Baton Rouge Advocate and its predecessors, vital forces in Louisiana’s capital city; Charleston’s News and Courier, one of the oldest daily papers in the South; predecessors of today’s Riverside Press-Enterprise, which chronicle California’s explosive growth; the Winston-Salem Journal, which became North Carolina’s first illustrated newspaper; and others. Also in Series 8 is previously unavailable coverage of titles in earlier series, including the Omaha Morning World-Herald, one of the Midwest’s foremost progressive newspapers. In addition, this new series features significant 19th-century titles that offer wide-ranging coverage of the Antebellum Period, when debates over slavery were reaching their peak in the American press. Among these titles is Frank Leslie’s Illustrated Newspaper, the most popular illustrated publication from the Antebellum Period to Reconstruction. 

From Early American Newspapers, Series 9

Series 9 delivers more outstanding historical newspapers, including The Boston Herald, one of America’s top three papers in the 1870s; predecessors of the San Diego Union-Tribune, this city’s most important newspaper; and the Bay City Times, which captures dramatic changes in Michigan as the automobile industry created a massive influx of immigrant workers. Also here are the Richmond Times-Dispatch, the newspaper of record for the capital of Virginia; predecessors of the Rockford Register Star, one of the largest papers in Illinois; the Marietta Journal, chronicling the challenges facing the South at the turn of the century; the Tampa Tribune, one of Florida’s most significant titles; and others. In addition, Series 9 offers significant 19th-century newspapers which chronicle the Jacksonian Era, the war with Mexico and Western expansion, the Civil War and Reconstruction.

For more information or to arrange a product trial, contact Readex at 800.762.8182 or readexmarketing@readex.com.

Be Sociable, Share!

The World’s Greatest Aviator: Daredevil Lincoln Beachey and the Dip of Death

Tuesday, March 13th, 2012

Lincoln J. Beachey (March 3, 1887 – March 14, 1915)

In the early 20th century, aviator Lincoln Beachey and his Curtis biplane amazed and delighted crowds with the “Dip of Death” and his mastery of “looping the loop.” Or by daring to fly upside down, which on one occasion shook $300 from his pocket and led him to quip,

I am willing to take a chance of losing my life flying upside down but it’s certainly tough to be torn loose from my bank roll, too.1

A groundbreaking aviator and breathtaking stuntman, he could boast of having performed for over 20 million spectators, or about one fifth of the U.S. population at the time. Yet 100 years later his name is largely unknown.

Source: Jackson (Mich.) Citizen Press; Jan. 30, 1914. Click open full article in PDF.

Beachey’s daring stunts kept his audiences captivated by playing on their worst fears. A January 1912 article in the Morning Oregonian referred to one such occasion as

a rather ghastly joke on the crowd that was still on edge as a result of the tragic fate of young Rutherford Page yesterday afternoon.

After several thrilling “death dips,” attempted emulation of which caused the sudden end of Page’s career, Beachey rose to an altitude of about 400 feet, from which he made a sheer drop almost perpendicularly and disappeared in the gully where Arch Hoxsey fell to his death a year ago.2

But to Beachey, the article continued, it was all just good fun. He “flew past the grandstand, and laughingly waved to the crowds which had experienced all the thrills of witnessing an aerial tragedy.”

In 1905, at just eighteen and before ever having set foot in an airplane, Beachey had already made a name for himself flying dirigibles. Quick to display his fearless attitude and confidence, he was quoted in the Baltimore American, saying:

It’s just as safe up there as it is down here, if you don’t get scared, and scary people…have no business in an airship.3

Dirigible flying proved to be both exciting and lucrative for Beachey. As the Aberdeen Daily American reported, he won first prize and $2,000 at the 1907 St. Louis Aeronautic Carnival:

In his “Beachey Airship,” a cigar-shaped affair, propelled by a four-cylinder gasoline motor, the winner covered the distance in four minutes and forty seconds.4

Beachey also led his peers in seeing aviation’s potential. In 1905 he expressed confidence in the safety of flying. As reported by The Macon Telegraph, he felt “just as safe a thousand feet up in the air as on terra firma” and he intended to

demonstrate to the world that it is practicable to navigate the air with safety and that the airship may be made a thing of commercial use.5

In October 1910 Beachey sold his dirigible and turned his attention to airplanes. By the summer of 1911 Beachey had begun attracting massive audiences. Over 150,000 people gathered that June to watch him “skim the falls of Niagara” and fly beneath the arch of the Honeymoon Bridge, feats that thrilled the aviator himself, as reported in the Cleveland Plain Dealer:6

Source: Cleveland Plain Dealer; June 28, 1911. Click to open full article in PDF.

Just over a month later, in August 1911, The Philadelphia Inquirer described Beachey speeding over the heart of Manhattan while winning $5,000 in a race between New York City and Philadelphia.7

Source: Philadelphia Inquirer; Aug. 6, 1911. Click to read full article in PDF.

Later that month at an aerial carnival in Chicago a quarter of a million people gathered to see Beachey set a new altitude record of 11,578 feet.8

When Beachey wasn’t setting records, winning races, or shocking crowds with his aerial acrobatics, he found other ways to amuse himself and his audiences. On February 19, 1912, the Morning Oregonian reported that

two Oakland ballplayers tried today to catch oranges dropped from an aeroplane flying at an altitude of 550 feet….Neither succeeded.9

And days later, also recounted in the Morning Oregonian, a cross-dressing Beachey posed as Mademoiselle Cozette De Truise, the “wonderful French aviatrix of Pau,” who dashed

through the air in a fashionable sheath gown above a gaping crowd at the Oakland aviation meet today, performing thrilling aerial feats….With silk skirts fluttering in a 40-mile gale and plumed hat straining at a long pink chiffon veil which anchored it to his head, Beachey sped around the air, now and then shaking a bespangled slipper at the astonished crowd.10

In fact, he dressed as an aviatrix more than once, and not always without consequence. A September 23, 1912 article in the Augusta Chronicle tells of Beachey in Chicago, “sending automobiles in all directions” as he “skimmed up and down Michigan Ave.” He so excited “the spectators in a launch in the harbor that they all gathered at one edge of the craft and it tipped over.”11

Eight months later, in May 1913, Beachey had completely changed his perspective. Although he still had not succeeded at looping the loop he told the Jackson Citizen Press,

You could not make me enter an aeroplane at the point of a revolver. I’m done!12

He went on to reproach his audiences for having

a morbid desire to see something happen. They all predicted I would be killed, and none wanted to miss getting in on it. They paid to see me die. They bet, and the odds were always against my life.13

Even the Daily Alaskan Dispatch reported the news of Beachey’s retirement, which he acknowledged was due to not only his fear of death, but also that…

I have made a fortune with my aeroplane…and I can retire to comfort. I am done with the game…14

By that fall, however, he seemed to have changed his reasons for retiring. In a 1913 Plain Dealer article headlined “The Pacemaker for Death Quits,” he referred to the “blame and remorse for the death of brother aviators who went crashing into eternity trying to ‘out-Beachey Beachey.’”15 The article further quoted Beachey as saying16

Ironically, two days later, Captain Peter Nesterov, a Russian pilot, would be the first to loop the loop. And twelve days after that, on September 21, 1913, before learning of Nesterov’s success, French airman Adolphe Pégoud also flew in a loop. Not to be outdone, Beachey came out of retirement. By the end of November 1913, he had flown a double loop, as reported in the Morning Oregonian:

Starting at a height of 2500 feet, the aviator dropped strait downward into the first loop and immediately turned over again into the second, landing afterward.17

And a month later, the Morning Oregonian reported that Beachey broke the

world’s record, looping the loop five consecutive times from a height of 750 feet and landing in a narrow street on the Panama-Pacific Exposition grounds. Beachey turned a double loop at a height of 300 feet, which, he said, is a record in-itself…18

Setting records looping the loop, however, was not enough to earn Beachey a living. Audiences quickly learned there was no need to buy tickets, since they could see the stunt from anywhere close by. Beachey found a solution in a high fence and popular racecar driver Barney Oldfield. Beachey began racing Oldfield, and the two took turns “winning” to keep crowds coming back night after night.

Source: The Duluth News Tribune; Sept. 10, 1914. Click to open full article in PDF.

Beachey’s savvy and skill made it easy to forget the ever-present danger at even these staged events. In January 1914 the Idaho Daily Statesmen reported that Beachey deliberately wrecked his biplane but avoided

what appeared to be a certain sacrifice of two lives….Beachey was descending after an exhibition flight, and directly below him was an automobile driven by Barney Oldfield and carrying a newspaper photographer as a passenger. The aviator swerved his machine, which collapsed and turned almost completely over, burying Beachey beneath it. His only injuries are bruises.19

Two Philadelphia Inquirer articles also recount Beachey’s willingness to attempt the seemingly impossible, and his luck at avoiding serious injury in the process. In December 1913 the Inquirer reported,

In what is believed to be the first biplane flight ever attempted underneath a roof, Lincoln Beachey circled successfully the interior of the Palace of Machinery at the exhibition grounds today, but made a poor landing and smashed his biplane. Beachey was not injured.20

About a week later, unfazed by the accident, Beachey told the paper “aviation within a closed structure was comparatively easy.”21

Source: Philadelphia Inquirer; January 9, 1914. Click to open full article in PDF.

While Beachey had escaped again with only bruises, he continued to be concerned that many aviators were less fortunate, particularly those of the U.S. Signal Corps. Beachey expressed his frustration toward not only the government’s inattention to the safety of its pilots, but also by its lack of recognition for the potential of military and commercial aviation. He told The Boston Journal:

Aviators of the government signal corps are being sacrificed….Many times I have seen these fellows patching up their old machines—trying to make an aircraft out of scrap! Lack of proper materials brings death to our army fliers. Even gasoline is scarce sometimes.22

Beachey continued, charging that the

parsimonious policy of our government toward aviation is directly responsible for its lack of advancement. Progress must be slow and dotted with tragedies until Congress is awakened to the value of flying as an agency in warfare and the affairs of commerce.23

This was not the only time Beachey voiced his concerns. On November 25, 1913, The Idaho Daily Statesman reported24

Eventually Congress began investigating the allegations of lack of proper equipment and mismanagement of the Aviation Section of the Army Signal Corps. Recorded in the U.S. Congressional Serial Set, a letter from the Senate Committee on Military Affairs referred to Beachey’s description of one base as “outrageously defective in equipment and management.” And “that he communicated his opinion in a bitter protest which came to the knowledge of the War Department.”25 Sadly, Beachey would not live to see his recommendations implemented.

On March 14, 1915, Lincoln Beachey’s breathtaking career came to a horrifying end at the Panama-Pacific International Exposition. He had just begun flying a monoplane rather than his steadfast Curtis biplane and the stress of his stunts proved too great for the monoplane’s construction. The Duluth News-Tribune reported,

At an altitude of 3,000 feet, Beachey began a sharp descent. The wings of his aeroplane collapsed and the machine plunged into San Francisco Bay.26

Although Beachey’s safety restraints minimized his injuries from the impact of the crash, he was unable to free himself from the wreckage and tragically drowned.27

 

Perhaps it was inevitable Beachey’s stunts would eventually be his undoing. In fact, he had foretold his own death. The Salt Lake Telegram’s obituary for Beachey recalled an interview in which after having named nine fellow aviators who had perished while stunt flying, Beachey with a cynical smile added: ‘Well, I might as well add my own name, too, because it is bound to come.’”28

By the time of his death Beachey was one of the two highest ranking officers in the Volunteer Aviation Reserve. The reserve’s organizer, Albert Lambert, spoke of the pluck Lincoln Beachey exhibited throughout his short life, telling the Salt Lake Telegram29

Beachey was referred to as a daredevil but the qualities which gave him that name are absolutely essential to military flying. It was his unlimited courage more than anything else that enabled Beachey to live as long as he did.

For information about making America’s Historical Newspapers available in your library, please contact sales@readex.com.

Source notes:

1“Gold Pours From Sky Money Drops to Earth as Aviator Somersaults in Air,” Plain Dealer, 11 November 1913, p. 1.

2“Spectators Gasp as Beachey Dives. Seeming Dip to Death beyond Hill is Just Aviator’s Joke on Crowd,” Morning Oregonian, 12 January 1912, p. 5.

3“Portland Has A Boy Aeronaut Taking Flights At Lewis And Clark Exposition,” Baltimore American, 21 August 1905, p. 13.

4Beachey Wins the Dirigible Contest Handles His Car with Remarkable Skill, Covering Course in 4:40,” Aberdeen Daily American, 24 October 1907, p. 1.

5“Airship Returns to Starting Point. Lincoln Beachey Brings City of Portland Back to Saw Horse” The Macon Telegraph, 31 August 1905, p. 2.

6“Aeroplane Skims Falls Of  Niagara Biplane, Driven by Lincoln Beachey, Thrills Crowd of 150,000,” Plain Dealer, 28 June 1911, p. 1.

7“Beachey, Winning Inter-City Air Race in Rain, Given Ovation by 50,000 at Belmont Plateau,” The Philadelphia Inquirer, 6 August 1911, p. 1.

8“250,000 Witness Big Air Meet End See Lincoln Beachey Establish World Record for Altitude Flight,” Plain Dealer, 21 August 1911, p. 2.

9“Baseball Falling 300 Feet Caught. Players Gets Missile That Aviator Drops. Attempt to Duplicate Washington Monument Feat, Using Oranges,” Morning Oregonian, 19 February 1912, p. 1.

10“’Aviatrix’ is Beachey. Airman’s Disguise Exposed by Rival after Sensational Flights,” Morning Oregonian, 25 February 1912, p. 1.

11“Daring Aviator’s Spectacular Drop,” Augusta Chronicle, 23 September 1912, p. 1.

12“Lincoln Beachey Says He Has Made His Last Aerial Voyage,” Jackson Citizen Press, 12 May 1913, p. 1.

13Ibid.

14“Beachey to Quit Flying He Announced. Dare-Devil of Clouds Fears Grim Reaper,” Daily Alaskan Dispatch, 12 May 1913, p. 1.

15“The Pacemaker for Death Quits,” Plain Dealer, 7 September 1913, p. 10.

16Ibid.

17“Beachy Flips in Flight Aviator Tries Double Loop the Loopand Land Safely,” Morning Oregonian, 26 November 1913, p. 2.

18“Beachey Does Fine Flops. Aviator Breaks Loop The Loop Record and Says He is Just Learning,” Morning Oregonian, 26 December 1913, p. 2.

19“Beachey Skirts Death,”Idaho Daily Statesmen, 11 January 1914, p. 1.

20“Beachey First to Fly Indoors,” The Philadelphia Inquirer, 31 December 1913, p. 14.

21“Lincoln Beachey in His Indoor Flight. Underground Fly is Beachey’s Desire,” The Philadelphia Inquirer, 9 January 1914, p. 2.

22“Aviator Says Voyages Safer than Marriage Lincoln Beachey Hero of Daring Air Stunts Says He’s Careful,” The Boston Journal, 29 May 1914, p. 3.

23Ibid.

24“Two Aeronauts Instructor and Novice Killed Inexplicable Dash to Ground Carries Two Army Men to Instant Death,” The Idaho Daily Statesmen, 25 November 1913, p. 1.

25“Investigation of the Aviation Service, United States Army,” U.S. Congressional Serial Set, 64th Congress, 1st Session, Senate Report 153, p. 3.

26“Beachey Falls to Death When Wings Crumple Aviator’s Spectacular Career Comes to End before Horrified Thousands,” The Duluth News-Tribune, 15 March 1915, p. 1.

27“Beachey Falls to Death When Wings Crumple Aviator’s Spectacular Career Comes to End before Horrified Thousands,” The Duluth News-Tribune, 15 March 1915, p. 2.

28“Aviator’s Death Fulfillment of Own Prophecy,” Salt Lake Telegram, 15 March 1915, p. 3.

29Ibid.

Be Sociable, Share!

The Connecticut Webster on Slavery (by Joshua Kendall)

Tuesday, March 6th, 2012

Joshua C. Kendall

The Connecticut Webster on Slavery

By Joshua Kendall, author of The Forgotten Founding Father: Noah Webster’s Obsession and the Creation of an American Culture

The pure-bred New Englander revered the Constitution. Though the eloquent statesman hated slavery, he sought to eradicate this evil without destroying the union. Division was anathema to him, as could perhaps be guessed from his ancestral name, Webster, which means “uniter” in Anglo-Saxon. And some three score and eight years before the outbreak of the Civil War, whose 150th anniversary we commemorated last spring, he advocated a moderate course designed to steer clear of bloodshed.

The man’s first name was Noah—not Daniel—and he hailed from Hartford. While his younger cousin, the Massachusetts legislator, would repeatedly take up the same mantle on the Senate floor, most notably in an impassioned speech on behalf of the Missouri Compromise in 1850, Noah Webster first spoke out against “the violated rights of humanity” back when Daniel was still in grade school.

Noah Webster by Sharples c 1798, 2nd Bank Portrait Gallery, Philadelphia. Source: Yale University

At the time of his death in 1843, Noah was the more famous Webster. After all, with his legendary speller first published at the end of the Revolution and his massive dictionary completed a half century later, he gave us our official language—American English. Moreover, this prolific writer was more than just America’s answer to the great British lexicographer, Samuel Johnson. In the mid-1780s, as George Washington’s personal policy advisor, he authored a series of influential essays in support of America’s founding document. A decade later, at President Washington’s behest, the Webster, whom Daniel once dubbed the “true likeness” of the clan, became the editor of New York City’s first daily newspaper. However, by the 1940s, when Daniel Webster was cross-examining the Devil in the Hollywood version of Stephen Vincent Benet’s short story, the Connecticut Webster was largely forgotten. Daniel, most Americans began to assume, must also have been a wordsmith.

Noah Webster founded New York's first daily newspaper, American Minerva, and edited it for four years.

During the economic downturn of the early 1790s, while toiling as a lawyer in his hometown, Noah Webster joined the fledgling Connecticut Society for the Promotion of Freedom. In the first wave of the antislavery movement, similar abolition groups cropped up in states from Massachusetts to North Carolina. In 1793, at the Connecticut society’s annual meeting, Webster delivered a memorable speech, “Effects of Slavery on Morals and Industry,” later expanded into a widely disseminated 56-page pamphlet.

Advertisement from Connecticut Courant for Webster's influential anti-slavery pamphlet. Source: America’s Historical Newspapers

To issue yet another moral condemnation of slavery, Webster felt, would be an insult to the “understandings of my enlightened fellow citizens” of Connecticut. Instead, he crafted a carefully nuanced argument, which emphasized how the barbaric institution dehumanized everyone. “The exercise of uncontrolled power,” he noted, “always gives a peculiar complexion to the manners, passions and conversation of both the oppressor and the oppressed.” Citing mountains of demographic data, Webster also maintained that slavery would continue to be a drain on macroeconomic productivity. In America where 700, 000 of the four million inhabitants were then slaves, exports per capita were about two thirds of the comparable figure in Great Britain where slaves had never comprised more than a tiny fraction of the population. “Men will not be industrious,” this keen observer of human nature concluded, “without a well founded expectation of enjoying the fruits of their labor.”

Title page of Effects of Slavery on Morals and Industry. Source: America’s Historical Imprints

As fervently as Webster wanted to rid his country of this scourge, he advised caution. “An attempt to abolish it [slavery] at a single blow,” he warned, “would expose the whole political body to dissolution.” To hammer home his point, he footnoted Cicero’s contention that “a remedy which cures the diseased parts of the state should be preferable to one which amputates them.” To heal America, Webster proposed a two-pronged solution. For the eight states north of Delaware, which then housed a total of only 40,000 slaves—four fifths of whom resided in New York and New Jersey—he recommended gradual abolition. For the six southern states, he urged plantation owners to “raise the slaves, by gradual means, to the condition of free tenants.” This policy, he was forced to concede, was far from satisfactory, as it probably would not translate into freedom for generations. However, given that the ratio of slaves to free inhabitants was a staggering 1 to 2.5 throughout the south, the Connecticut scribe saw no other “method for meliorating the condition of the blacks without essentially injuring the slave, the master and the public.”

While Southerners, of course, ignored this New Englander, Northerners paid close attention. Several years later, prodded by Webster’s Federalist party ally, Alexander Hamilton, who wrote frequent editorials for his paper, the New York legislature passed a law whereby all male slaves born after July 4, 1799 would be freed upon their 28th birthday. By 1804, every northern state, which hadn’t already outlawed slavery, had passed such a gradual emancipation law. In 1828, to illustrate the meaning of the term in his dictionary, Webster could proudly assert, “Slavery no longer exists…in the northern states of America.”

Soon after the publication of his “great book,” the abolition movement, which had lain dormant for decades, made a comeback. This time around, its leaders such as William Lloyd Garrison demanded immediate emancipation. By then, Noah Webster was in his 70s, and he feared a radical shake-up of his country more than ever. Of New England’s second generation of Abolitionists, he wrote in 1837: “They are absolutely deranged….slavery is a great sin and a great calamity, but it is not our sin.”

Given the bloody carnage that was to follow a quarter century later, the trepidation about taking decisive action expressed by both Websters was not entirely unwarranted.

About the Author

An award-winning freelance journalist, Joshua Kendall has written for numerous publications including The Boston Globe, Business Week, Psychology Today, The Wall Street Journal and The Nation. His first book was a biography of Peter Mark Roget, the Victorian doctor and wordsmith. His most recent book, The Forgotten Founding Father: Noah Webster’s Obsession and the Creation of an American Culture, was released in paperback on March 6, 2012. Joseph J. Ellis calls Kendall’s latest “by far the best, and best written, life of Webster,” and James McGrath Morris says, “Kendall single-handily rescues the least-known founder of American politics and culture and gives him his long overdue place of importance.” The article above first appeared in the February 2012 issue of The Readex Report.

Be Sociable, Share!

Librarian turned award-winning biographer hails research value of historical newspapers

Thursday, March 1st, 2012

Paperback publication date: March 1, 2012

Kate Buford, who began her career as a Wall Street law librarian with an MLS from Columbia University, has written the first comprehensive biography of Jim Thorpe, widely regarded as America’s greatest all-around athlete. Library Journal called Buford’s work “the definitive biography of a legendary figure in American history, in and out of sports. An essential purchase.” Among the awards received by Native American Son: The Life and Sporting Legend of Jim Thorpe (Knopf, 2010) are the Society for American Baseball Research 2011 Larry Ritter Award, the Professional Football Researchers Association 2010 Nelson Ross Award, and Editors’ Choice from The New York Times.

Discussing the extensive research behind her acclaimed biography, which is being published today in paperback by University of Nebraska Press, Buford writes:

Kate Buford will be a panelist in the “Creating a Beautifully Written Biography” session at the Third Annual Compleat Biographer Conference this May.

I sure wish the ever-expanding resource of digitized historical newspaper archives had been available in its present form to draw on in 2002 when I started the research for Native American Son. Back then it was a thrill (maybe best appreciated by other biographers) to order microfilm reels of The Raleigh [N.C.] News and Observer on inter-library loan for the summers of 1909 and 1910. When the boxes came in, I got to spend hours sitting at the microfilm reader in the Greenburgh public library in Westchester County, New York, tracking, frame by celluloid frame, Jim Thorpe’s unsuccessful attempt to break into major league baseball by playing for two minor league teams in the Tar Heel State.

Those two summers would cost him the two gold medals for the pentathlon and decathlon he won two years later at the 1912 Stockholm Olympics. A newspaper scoop in The Worcester [Mass.] Telegram in January 1913 revealed that Thorpe was a—wait for it—professional because he had played for money for those two summers and thus had been unqualified to compete as an amateur.

Kate will be writing about that scoop and the ensuing rush to judgment in an upcoming issue of The Readex Report. She’ll look at how what many still regard as sports’ biggest scandal was played out in the newspapers of the time. To subscribe to our quarterly e-publication, use this simple form.

Be Sociable, Share!

The Lady’s Maid: A Life in Service in America

Monday, February 27th, 2012

Downton Abbey, a drama that recently ended its second season on PBS about the English aristocracy and their servants during the Edwardian era, has become a cult hit in the United States. A great deal of its appeal is nostalgia for an elegant way of life unfamiliar to most of us. And there is likely not a woman alive who has not wished for a lady’s maid (of a nicer sort) than the dour and scheming O’Brien, lady’s maid to Lady Grantham (Cora Crawley). Ladies’ maids were part seamstress, masseuse, hairdresser, beautician and secretary. Unlike the rest of the servants, they reported directly to the lady of the house rather than to the housekeeper or butler, which set them apart from the others.

As Downton Abbey makes abundantly clear, a strict hierarchy ruled “below stairs” too. The butler, housekeeper and ladies’ maids were at the top. Because of the close nature of the relationship between the lady of the house and her maid, maids were carefully selected. According to The Lady’s Maid: Her Duties and How to Perform Them, a manual published in 1870,

As the office itself demands great neatness, skill and taste, as well as discretion and cleverness, they choose servants of a better education than ordinary; so that by mistresses and maids this is considered the highest kind of female service.1

Source: America's Historical Newspapers

Ladies’ maids often had special privileges, such as private sitting rooms, and held rank and authority over the other servants. They were literate, generally well-spoken, could often speak a foreign language and were expected to show a nicety of manners not often expected of the “lower servants.”

Generally only the wealthiest households in America could afford a lady’s maid. The Duluth News Tribune stated that “in this country a lady’s maid is almost entirely an indulgence limited to the rich…Here the compensation of a good lady’s maid varies from $30 to $60 a month. In Europe it may be half that.2

The News Tribune also noted that a servant class was built into the structure of European life. For example, in Europe, where upper class ladies often travelled with their maids, many hotels set aside certain (cheaper) rooms for the maids. It was rare in America to find such accommodations; the lady’s maid would be expected to be lodged as a regular guest.

Some Americans openly disapproved of the very concept of a lady’s maid, calling the practice, as the Cincinnati Daily Enquirer said, “a feeble and ridiculous custom.”3 The Enquirer went on to describe the duties of a lady’s maid: “When the lady finally leaves her couch, the maid must proceed to dress her—think of that, our young American women, who would be ashamed to be dressed by another woman!” Ultimately, the Enquirer declared the custom was “a mere affection of foreign habits—a bit of snobbishness.”4 Fundamentally, it was un-American.

Despite that sentiment, the lady’s maid often became a status symbol in the U.S. America’s wealthiest families adopted the European tradition of ladies’ maids, including the Rockefellers, the Vanderbilts, and the Astors, all of whom, as avidly reported in The Parson’s Weekly Blade, chose women who had lived among the families of European noblemen.5

Due to the highly personal nature of the relationship between the lady of the house and her maid, ladies’ maids were often hired on personal referral. Few want ads can be found for ladies’ maids in the newspapers of the time, but because they were such rare and curious commodities, numerous articles were published about them. No doubt, like today, readers enjoyed fantasizing about the lifestyles of the rich and famous.

The lady’s maid was expected to bring her mistress breakfast in bed, help her dress and undress (as many as five times a day), maintain and select her mistress’s wardrobe and jewelry, and style her hair. A skilled lady’s maid was much valued. Such a woman often served as a beautician and stylist. She could give a plain woman confidence as well as the much-desired sophistication and glamour to launch herself successfully into high society. The skills of one’s lady’s maid could mean the difference between triumph and failure.

The Daily Inter Ocean amusingly described the transformation of one unpromising debutante by an accomplished lady’s maid. After the “make-over”

not one of all the flock of debutantes could hold a candle to the ugly duckling, chic and distinguished in her carefully chosen gown, her straight brown hair fluffed and curled…the thin neck surrounded by a string of pearls so beautiful that in admiring them and calculating their value people forgot to notice that they covered bones. It was not in that girl to be a brilliant success but she was rescued from oblivion…All owing to the maid.6

Ladies’ maids also sometimes shared their style and beauty tips in the newspapers. The Baltimore American even ran a two-part series called “Confessions of a Lady’s Maid,” in which a maid shared her special techniques for beautifying her mistress and improving her figure.7 High society ladies often wore make-up, although many proclaimed they did not. The effect was to look natural, and their figures were often improved by the addition of padding and corsetry.

A position as a lady’s maid was not an easy one, subject as she was to the will and caprice of her mistress at all hours of the day and night. No wonder then that some ladies’ maids took advantage of their years of training in service and exposure to the fashions of high society to set themselves up as modistes and hairdressers catering to women of wealth. Ironically, as a lady’s maid interviewed by The Trenton Evening Times said:

Then the positions of maid and mistress are reversed and it is often Mme So and So who drives up in her brougham and requests an audience of her ex-bonne to plead longer time on the milliner’s bill that has grown out of all proportion to her income.8

Reportedly some of the finest modistes of New York had their start in service. In some ways, the story of ladies’ maids in America can be seen as true American success stories.

To find more information on what it was like to be a lady’s maid, simply search “lady’s maid” in the headline field of America’s Historical Newspapers.

Notes

1The Lady’s Maid: Her Duties and How to Perform Them, Houlston and Sons, London, 1870, p. 6. http://www.victorianlondon.org/publications/housemaid.htm Accessed 2-15-2012.

2“Lady’s Maid A Luxury,” The Duluth News Tribune (10-2-1902), p. 11.

3“The Lady’s Maid,” Cincinnati Daily Enquirer (4-1-1868), p. 4

4Ibid

5The Lady’s Maid Often Overworked and Rarely Appreciated,” The Parson’s Weekly Blade (2-15-1896), p. 2.

6“The Lady’s Maid” The Daily Inter Ocean (11-15-1896), p. 26.

7See “Confessions of a Lady’s Maid,” Baltimore American (9-25-1910), p. 45 and (10-16-1910), p. 53

8“Told by a Lady’s Maid,” Trenton Evening Times (7-11-1889), p. 2.

Be Sociable, Share!

Budding novelist uses online newspaper archive to recreate the Civil War-era French Quarter

Tuesday, February 21st, 2012

Guest blogger: Ja-ne de Abreu, an award-winning writer in the media production industry currently embarking on her first novel

The Louisiana Historical Newspaper Archive has proven to be an invaluable source for research for me. Currently, I am writing a historical novel set in New Orleans during the Civil War. Before access to this digital newspaper archive, I was able to find vague references to events that happened in the city during this period, but not many details. Once I started perusing the local daily newspapers of that era, I was able to find the missing key I needed to give my novel weight. For instance, several books and websites state that Mardi Gras did not occur during the Civil War. Yet local newspapers reveal that while there were no parades, Mardi Gras balls were held in 1862, 1864 and 1865, leaving 1863 the only year in this span with no mention of festivities.

Source: Louisiana Historical Newspaper Archive. Click to open full page in PDF.

The ability to access more than one local newspaper can provide a fuller perspective. For example, the Daily Picayune has a brief paragraph about the departure from New Orleans of Union General Benjamin Franklin Butler, who administered the city during the Civil War, but The Daily Delta features General Butler’s entire “Address to the People of New Orleans.” Other sources I researched gave me a general feel about how people lived then, but reading an actual newspaper from that era pulled me into their world, immersing me in local events as they happened and enabling me to feel and think as they did.

Be Sociable, Share!

Franklin scholar uses America’s Historical Newspapers to trace an ingenious hoax

Thursday, February 16th, 2012

Carla Mulford, Dept. of English, Penn State University

In December 2008 an essay about one of Benjamin Franklin’s cleverest hoaxes was published in The Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society. Written by distinguished Franklin scholar Carla Mulford, “Benjamin Franklin’s Savage Eloquence: Hoaxes from the Press at Passy, 1782” was awarded the prestigious William L. Mitchell Prize from the Bibliographical Society of America on January 27, 2012.

As explained in the Bibliographical Society’s press release, Dr. Mulford’s article…

Source: Proceedings of the American Philosophical Association (Dec. 2008)

concerns the printing, distribution, rhetorical strategy, and impact of Franklin’s bogus Supplement to the Boston Independent Chronicle, no. 705, dated 12 March 1782.  In its distributed second impression, this single-leaf extra contained two principal texts by Franklin that purport to be by others.  On the front is a report by an American Captain, Samuel Gerrish, on his capturing a cargo of human scalps taken in recent years “by the Senneka Indians from the Inhabitants of the Frontiers,” with incriminating documentation transcribed within the article (including an Indian’s note asking that the scalps be sent “over the Water to the great King” with the starving Indians’ request for better treatment). The second item, not present in the undistributed first printing of the hoax as a single-sided broadside, was a purported letter by John Paul Jones to the British administrator Sir Joseph Yorke, who had previously failed to honor a prisoner exchange agreement with Jones and had written disparaging testimonies regarding Jones and the related events. To fill out the pages of the paper, the hoax also contains advertisements typical of the Boston Independent Chronicle

Click to open prize-winning essay in PDF.

In her prize-winning essay, Mulford, Associate Professor of English at Penn State University and Founding President of the Society of Early Americanists, explains the “continued life of the first article (on the harvest of scalps),” which soon appeared in American newspapers and which was reprinted at least 34 times, “well into the nineteenth century, when it had the unintended effect of justifying hostilities to American Indians.” An appendix of “Nineteenth-Century Newspaper Re-Publications of the Supplement” concludes her study.

Among the high praise from the judges was this comment:

Dr. Mulford “displays a remarkable knowledge and control of the vast Franklin materials, primary and secondary, along with an excellent, precise bibliographical approach. A rare combination.”

Professor Mulford recently acknowledged the benefits of using Readex databases in her research for this article and her forthcoming book, Benjamin Franklin and the Ends of Empire:

America’s Historical Newspapers enabled me to trace the different contemporary and then later uses of the ‘scalping’ hoax. By way of background, let me point out that Franklin was profoundly troubled that the British military was paying Native peoples to create devastation on British Americans’ homes and to kill the people. Franklin had spent much of his time while in Pennsylvania (decades earlier) figuring out how best to negotiate peacefully with Indians. So he was outraged when the Indians became (by necessity and in an effort to preserve their own sovereignty) involved in the fray between Britons in North America and those in England. The Readex database made it possible for me to discover the posthumous uses to which Franklin’s hoax had been put, and, with terrible irony, I discovered that it was used to promulgate a form of Indian-hating by Americans in North America. The original target, British peoples in England, was lost, and the Indians received the central, negative thrust of the hoax. I think Franklin would have found this appalling. So I traced the uses of the hoax and made a record of it, so that others might see how periodical circulation takes on a life of its own.

Prof. Mulford is preparing an article about her use of the Archive of Americana, including Early American Imprints and Early American Newspapers.  Look for it in a future issue of The Readex Report.

Be Sociable, Share!

Just published — The Readex Report: February 2012

Tuesday, February 14th, 2012

In our latest issue: The emancipation efforts of a forgotten Founding Father; a felonious figure pens a revered evangelical reference; and social media’s unprecedented impact on academic networking.

The Connecticut Webster on Slavery

By Joshua Kendall, author of The Forgotten Founding Father: Noah Webster’s Obsession and the Creation of an American Culture

The pure-bred New Englander revered the Constitution. Though the eloquent statesman hated slavery, he sought to eradicate this evil without destroying the union. Division was anathema to him, as could perhaps be guessed from his ancestral name, Webster, which means “uniter” in Anglo-Saxon. And some three score and eight years before the outbreak of the Civil War, whose 150th anniversary we commemorated last spring, he advocated a moderate course designed to steer clear of bloodshed.…(read article)

A Reverend Revealed: The Real Identity of One of the Most Influential (and Simplistic) Thinkers of the 19th Century

By James Lutzweiler, Archivist and Rare Book Curator, Southeastern Baptist Theological Seminary

Pulitzer Prize winner William H. Goetzmann of Yale and the University of Texas was secure enough in his scholarship to be his own severest critic. About Beyond the Revolution: A History of American Thought from Paine to Pragmatism, the last book he wrote before his death in September 2010, Goetzmann lamented to this writer (who contributed one of the book’s backcover dust jacket reviews) shortly after its publication that he had forgotten to include a few thinkers he had intended to discuss. For a second editon, I would have suggested to him that he slightly modify the subtitle to read “…from Paine to Premillenialism,” and to have dedicated a chapter at least as long as that on Paine to a relatively unknown but enormously influential character called Cyrus Ingerson Scofield—when he wasn’t being called by his criminal alias “Charlie Ingerson.” (read article)

Academic Networking 2.0: Historians and Social Media

By Michael D. Hattem, PhD Student, Yale University

As the academic job market in history continues to shrink, networking has become something no tenure-track hopeful can afford to ignore. At the same time, the rise of social media has afforded historians with new and inventive ways to network with colleagues from around the world. Whether posting from conferences in real-time on Twitter, connecting with fellow historians on Facebook, or playing active roles in the blogosphere, younger historians are utilizing social media for both professional networking and scholarly development. (read article)

Subscribe today to receive the next quarterly issue of The Readex Report in your inbox. Browse previous issues in our archive. If you would like to comment, contribute or suggest an article, please email The Readex Report editor: readexreport@readex.com.

Be Sociable, Share!