Archive for the ‘Digital Humanities’ Category

Cutting-edge Biographers, Corporate Crimes, Seductive Cards and a Deadly Sport in the new Readex Report

Tuesday, September 20th, 2011

In our latest issue: A recent New York Times op-ed posits digitized newspapers have “the potential to revolutionize biographical research”; digital archives expose corrupt corporate governance across history; how sailing cards leveraged an idealized picture of manhood and masculinity; and the lethal legacy of an ephemeral American sport—plus three featured posts from this blog.

The Biographer’s New Best Friend

From The New York Times Sunday Review (Sept. 11, 2011)

By Stephen Mihm

Associate Professor of History, University of Georgia

 

Improving Public Policymaking with the Help of Digital Archives

By Robert E. Wright

Author of Fubarnomics: A Lighthearted, Serious Look at  America’s Economic Ills  

 

Nineteenth Century Imperial Manhood in Clipper Ship Cards 

By Jeffrey Gagnon

Ph.D. candidate in Early American Literature, University of California, San Diego

 

“Thrills and Funerals”: Researching the Board Track Era of Motorcycle Racing in America‘s Historical Newspapers

By Larry Lawrence

Creator of “The Rider Files”

From the Readex Blog

“Information Wanted” Advertisements: Searching for African American Family Members

By Reinette F. Jones

Librarian, Louis B. Nunn Center for Oral History, University of Kentucky  

“A Dastardly Outrage”: Kate Brown and the Washington-Alexandria Railroad Case

By Betty Koed

Associate Historian,  Senate Historical Office,  United States Senate

Anti-Flirtation: There Ought to Be a Law

By August A. Imholtz, Jr.

Vice President, Government Publications, Readex, A Division of NewsBank

Subscribe today to receive the November 2011 issue in your inbox. Browse previous issues in our archive. If you would like to contribute or suggest an article, please write to The Readex Report editor by emailing readexreport@readex.com.

Be Sociable, Share!

Religion and the Rise of the Second Ku Klux Klan, 1915-1922 (by Kelly J. Baker)

Friday, September 2nd, 2011

[This article by Kelly J. Baker, who currently teaches American and religious studies at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville, first appeared in the September 2009 issue of The Readex Report. Baker is also an editor of the Religion in American History blog. Her first book, Gospel According to the Klan: The KKK’s Appeal to Protestant America, 1915–1930, is being published this month by the University Press of Kansas.]

“An original and sobering work” -- David Morgan, author of Protestants and Pictures

In 1915, the second incarnation of the Ku Klux Klan was born. The second Klan, a memorial to the Reconstruction Klan and its work in the postbellum South, was to act as a restructured fraternity that supported white supremacy, the purity of white womanhood, nationalism and Protestant Christianity. William J. Simmons, a fraternalist and former minister, organized the charter for the new order and consecrated its beginning by setting afire a cross on the top of Stone Mountain, Georgia.

Simmons’s flair for the theatric (including the adoption of the fiery cross as a symbol of the Klan)—along with the order’s aggressive public relations campaign and membership boon—quickly gained the attention of local and national newspapers. Reporters commented on the Klan’s platform, its stated intentions and its historical connections to the Reconstruction Klan. Some of the initial coverage, in the South especially, was favorable. The Columbia Enquirer Sun wrote, “Proof that the noble spirit that actuated the members of the famous Ku Klux Klan in the reconstruction period still lives among the sons is shown in the remarkable growth of the organization…” (1) The new order seemed to have the potential to reform the region—and possibly the nation.

Click to open full article in PDF.

The Klan’s white robes and masks, elaborate initiation (or naturalization) ceremonies, burning crosses and altars draped with the American flag all proved alluring to the media and their readership. The Miami Herald documented the “weird” ceremonies of the Klan from a distance. Especially fascinating was the naturalization ritual in which a mass of white-robed men swore loyalty to their nation and to Christianity. The Herald noted both the presence of an altar containing the fiery cross and the American flag at this central ritual. (2) Although Simmons cloaked the new order in the familiar white robes of its predecessor, he explicitly developed the Christian nature of the order and its ties to religious faith and patriotism. Under his dramaturgical leadership, the order moved beyond the bounds of the South and into the rest of the continental United States.

Click to open full article in PDF.

The press as well as the larger public, however, did not remain congenial to the new Klan. They denounced the order as a money-making scheme, an agent of hate and violence and a dangerous secret society. Scholarship on the 1920s Klan affirms that the order did commit acts of violence, employed the rhetoric of anti-Catholicism and anti-Semitism and promoted white supremacy by degrading African Americans. The order was not, however, a secular fraternity. Instead, its popularity came from the combination of religion and nationalism it promoted, both of which appealed to white Protestant Americans who feared that immigration and changing social mores would overthrow their social dominance. Scholars of the Klan note the religious overtones of the order’s printed and spoken word, and American newspapers documented and opposed the Klan’s Christian presentations.

The second Klan required its members to be not only white and male but also Christian. Religion became the centerpiece of the second Klan’s platform, and Klansmen showed their allegiance to their faith through church attendance, speeches and writings and the recruitment of ministers as members. Visiting churches to make monetary donations was another method used by Klan members to show their commitment. In Spokane, Washington, two Klansmen dressed in full regalia—white robes with masks over their faces—presented the evangelist George Wood with fifty dollars and a letter affirming the order’s support of the “Christian religion” because of the success of his revival.(3)

In Indiana, twelve robed Klansmen gave revivalist Billy Sunday fifty dollars and a similar letter. According to the Miami Herald’s account, the Klan visit shocked Sunday, who could not even read the letter he had been given. The letter praised Sunday’s efforts to promote Christianity in his revivals. Sunday responded, “I am not a member of the Ku Klux Klan, nor am I a member of any secret order, but I have learned more tonight than I ever knew.”(4) Sunday’s surprise at the presence of Klansmen at his revival signaled a lack of knowledge of the order’s Christian foundations.

Click to open full article in PDF.

Despite the efforts of the Klan to highlight its ties to Protestant Christianity, the order faced opposition from ministers, church councils and other Christians. In 1922, the Federal Council of Churches recorded its conviction that the rise of secret organizations “whose activities have the effect of arousing religious prejudice and racial consequences [is] fraught with grave consequences to church and society at large.”(5)

Click to open full article in PDF.

The resolution was aimed directly at the Klan and church members who joined the order. Yet despite the Council’s condemnation of the order, local churches continued to affiliate with the fraternity. Other detractors were more strident in their denunciations. Anti-Klan lecturer and author W.C. Witcher denounced the Klan’s claims to 100% Americanism, Christianity and lawfulness. He also derided the order’s conflation of nationalism and religion. Witcher feared that the order would damage Christianity, arguing “If the Klan is a religious organization it will destroy the Christian religion, unless it is destroyed itself.”(6)

Click to open full article in PDF.

Former Klansman Henry Fry also voiced his opposition to the order and declared its brand of Christianity to be false and blasphemous. In a public letter to the Klan, Fry documented the supposed egregious behaviors of the Klan—including fraud, financial scheming and lawlessness—and its insult to religion.(7)

Click to open full article in PDF.

Witcher and Fry were examples of Protestant Christians who denounced the order for religious reasons, but African Americans, Catholics, Jews, politicians (at local and national levels), Congress, businessmen, editors and many others also reviled the order for its aggressive stance on race and nation.

Yet regardless of the opposition the Klan faced in the 1920s, the order and its members remained committed to its vision of Christianity and Americanism. To respond to their critics, the Klan’s leadership engaged the press, hoping to use its influence to defend their ideals and present their own understanding of the benefit of such a movement. William Simmons volunteered for interviews and even testified in front of Congress to defend the Klan. Pro-Klan pastors gave lectures on the “true” nature of the Klan and its benefit for America. The Protestant Christian nature of the Klan was always at the forefront of these debates, and Christianity played a vital role in the development and maintenance of the order. What becomes clear is that Klansmen were supporters of the “Christian religion,” and their actions showed their commitment to their understanding of their faith despite the best efforts of their detractors.

——————————————————————————–

Footnotes:

1 “Col. Simmons Discusses The Knights of the Ku Klux Klan,” The Columbus Enquirer Sun, 92:211 (July 12, 1920), 5.

2 “Klansmen Conduct Weird Ceremonials While Throng Watches in Wonderment,” The Miami Herald, 12:75, (February 8, 1922), 1, 8.

3 “Gospel Crusade Praised,” The Idaho Daily Statesman, 202 (March 17, 1922), 1.

4 “Ku Klux Gives $50 to Billy Sunday,” The Miami Herald, 12:174 (May 18, 1922), 4.

5 “Ku Klux Disowned By Churches,” The Savannah Tribune, 37:52 (October 12, 1922), 1.

6 “Terror Reign Seen If Klan Is Allowed To Exist,” Fort Worth Star Telegram, 42:98 (May 9, 1922), 7.

7 “Man Who Was A Member Denounces K.K.K. As An Insult to Christians,” Dallas Morning News, (September 7, 1921), 1, 2.

Be Sociable, Share!

Writing the First Biography of Noah Webster in the Digital Age

Monday, August 22nd, 2011

More than America’s greatest lexicographer, Noah Webster (1758-1843) published a supremely influential spelling book, served as confidant of both George Washington and Alexander Hamilton, effectively supported the U.S. Constitution through a widely read essay, edited New York City’s first daily newspaper American Minerva, served as a state representative in both Connecticut and Massachusetts, and helped to found Amherst College.

To bring this “full-bodied human being to life,” award-winning journalist Joshua Kendall, author of The Man Who Made Lists, recently published The Forgotten Founding Father: Noah Webster’s Obsession and the Creation of American Culture (Putnam, 2011). Joseph J. Ellis calls Kendall’s new biography “by far the best, and best written, life of Webster,” and James McGrath Morris says “Kendall single-handily rescues the least-known founder of American politics and culture and gives him his long overdue place of importance.”

In his note on sources used to write The Forgotten Founding Father, Kendall explains:

From America's Historical Newspapers. Click to open full advertisement in PDF.

“I aimed not to write the definitive academic biography but to introduce Noah Webster to the broad reading public, who know him largely as a name pasted onto a reference book. Intrigued by the psychological turmoil which fueled his literary activity, particularly the dictionary, I was interested in bringing the full-bodied human being to life.  To tackle this assignment, I deemed it necessary to peruse as many primary sources as possible, especially since Webster’s descendants had done so much to sculpt his public image….

“I also immersed myself in Webster’s own published words.  As the first Webster biographer of the digital age, I could do much of this reading on my own laptop.  The online resource The Archive of Americana now features scanned copies of most American newspapers between 1690 and 1922.  By searching Webster’s name, I was able to find countless newspaper articles by and about this prolific journalist, including some not mentioned in the six-hundred-page tome A Bibliography of the Writings of Noah Webster, edited by Edwin H. Carpenter (New York, 1958). Likewise, the early American imprints section of the database includes the full text of many of Webster’s books and speeches, such as his various Independence Day orations and his 1806 ‘compend.’”

As Kendall notes, the Archive of Americana provides online access to cohesive collections of historical newspapers and books. This growing family of searchable printed materials, which also includes essential U.S. government publications, puts tens of millions of pages of primary documents at researchers’ fingertips.

For more information about the Archive of Americana, please contact readexmarketing@readex.com or visit our website.

Be Sociable, Share!

Baseball in America: Its Origins and Early Days

Wednesday, June 29th, 2011

Some things never change, or so suggested the Duluth News Tribune in 1916:

The origins of America’s national pastime are murky to say the least. How- ever, the contest now recognized as the first officially recorded baseball game in U.S. history took place 165 years ago on June 19, 1846.

One thing we know for certain about baseball’s origins is it was not invented by Abner Doubleday in Cooperstown, New York in 1839. The beginnings of baseball are more likely found in earlier games such as rounders, town ball, and old cat. The latter is described in a 1905 Baltimore American article.

The claim that Doubleday invented the game was disputed at the time it was asserted and adopted by the Mills Commission in 1905, over a dozen years after Doubleday’s death. In fact, according to this Springfield Republican article published in 1908…

According to many baseball historians the earliest mention of the game in America appears in a 1791 Pittsfield, Massachusetts ordinance banning the game from being played within 80 yards of the newly built town meeting house.

The earliest reference to baseball in America’s Historical Newspapers is found in an 1827 New York Commercial Advertiser article about Signor Voarino’s “Treatise on Callisthenic Exercises, arranged for the private tuition of ladies.” Baseball is noted as an alternative to the suggested exercises.

Another early reference to baseball is found in the essay “The Village Belle” by Mary Mitford which was reprinted in several early American newspapers, the earliest of which appeared in The Rhode-Island American in 1828.

Click to read full item in PDF.

In an interesting historical side note, this article is cited by some historians as being one of the earliest examples of baseball in America. However, this is incorrect. Upon reading the entire essay one finds references to the House of Commons and the Lord Chief Justice, British institutions both. It is entirely likely this essay was not only about an English village but also first appeared nine years earlier, in 1819, as one of Miss Mitford’s “Our Village” sketches in “The Lady’s Magazine,” a British fashion magazine published monthly form 1770-1837.

The most peculiar aspect of all the very early references to the game is that no one seemed to feel it was necessary to describe what they were calling baseball. This suggests that baseball was not considered an altogether new game even at the time. In fact, the game would not be officially described or—more accurately stated—codified for at least another ten years after the historic 1846 game in Hoboken, New Jersey. In 1856, the Knickerbocker Base Ball Club called for a convention of the various clubs of New York City.

According to the New York Herald, the convention met in January 1857, “for the purpose of discussing and deciding upon a…

The second annual convention of Base Ball Clubs of New York was held in March 1858 and focused more on the overall organization of the various clubs than on particular rules of the game (New York Herald).

Baseball continued to change throughout the late 1800s and by the early 20th century some people had already begun looking back on the earlier game with nostalgia, as seen in this August 1906 article in The Grand Forks Daily Herald.

Another retrospective of the early game is found in this 1894 Plain Dealer article. And, in 1899, the Anaconda Standard published this brief history of the game:

One idea that would have literally changed the course of the game had it caught on is described by the Evening News of San Jose, California, in this 1906 article:

The last 100 years have seen many notable changes to the game: an end to the “dead ball” era in 1919; the widespread introduction of electric lights and night games in the mid-1930s; the official integration of the game in 1947; the extension of the season from 154 games to 162 in 1961; and the adaptation of the designated hitter position by the American League in 1973. One constant, however, especially in the eyes of Red Sox fans, is the conflict between players and the media that is never far below the surface. 

In closing, here are two examples of that tension. Early in 1912, Boston sportswriter Herman Nickerson dubbed several players as members of the “Society for the Prevention of Victory.” 

And that was after the Red Sox had won the game! Over 50 years later, Ted Williams, the self-described greatest hitter who ever lived, didn’t miss an opportunity to return the insult saying, before his final game,         

Ours too, Ted.

Be Sociable, Share!

Top-Ten Articles Published in The Readex Report

Tuesday, June 21st, 2011

The Readex Report is a quarterly e-newsletter that explores diverse aspects of both modern librarianship and digital historical collections. Through original articles by academic faculty and librarians, The Readex Report provides insights on topics as wide-ranging as those found in the following list of the most clicked-upon articles published since 2006.

Preserving the Library in the Digital Age

By Benjamin L. Carp, Assistant Professor of History, Tufts University [Volume 4, Issue 4]

Heart or Muscle? The Library in the Digital Age

By Edward Shephard, State University of New York, Binghamton [Volume 4, Issue 3]

“Meet the Students”: Bringing Your Library’s Online Resources Into Your Students’ “Circle of Trust”

By Lynn D. Lampert, Chair, Reference & Instructional Services, California State University, Northridge [Volume 2, Issue 2]

How Libraries Can Win in Today’s Web 2.0 Environment 

By Terry Reese, The Gray Family Chair for Innovative Library Services, Oregon State University [Volume 4, Issue 2]

This Headache Is Killing Me: The Bromo-Seltzer Poisonings of 1898

By John Odell, Publisher, Digger Odell Publications [Volume 4, Issue 4]

User-Centered Design for Digital Collections

By Michael Edmonds, Digital Librarian, Wisconsin Historical Society [Volume 4, Issue 1]

Religion and the Rise of the Second Ku Klux Klan, 1915-1922

By Kelly J. Baker, Ph.D., University of New Mexico [Volume 4, Issue 3]

An Undergraduate’s Reflections on Original American History Research: How Online Access to Historical Newspapers Helped Prepare an Award-Winning Tea Party Study

By David Brooks, Graduate, Taylor University [Volume 5, Issue 4]

“Worlds Apart? The Relationship Between Teaching and Marketing and What It Means to Academic Librarians

By Jill S. Stover, Undergraduate Services Coordinator, Virginia Commonwealth University [Volume 2, Issue 3]

Commodore Vanderbilt: Patriot or War Profiteer?

By T.J. Stiles, author of The First Tycoon: The Epic Life of Cornelius Vanderbilt, 2009 National Book Award Winner [Volume 5, Issue 1]

To subscribe to forthcoming issues of this quarterly e-newsletter, please use this form. If you have any questions or comments, or if you would like to contribute an original article, please contact The Readex Report editor by emailing readexreport@readex.com. We hope to hear from you!

Be Sociable, Share!

Just Browsing: Cool Items from the Past

Tuesday, June 14th, 2011

One of the joys of browsing American historical newspapers is discovering the unexpected from around the world. Take this photograph, for example, of a car being dragged across a Siberian river during the Peking-to-Paris race in 1907:

Source: Cleveland Plain Dealer; Date: Aug. 18, 1907; Page: 29

Or this photo of European ostrich racing in the 1920s:

Source: Cleveland Plain Dealer, Date: Sept. 28, 1924; Page 76

And then this picture of the same race in a different newspaper, which notes that these jockeys couldn’t get their birds to go!

Source: Springfield Republican; Date: Oct. 1, 1924; Page: 18

While you expect to see photos of the stars of stage and screen in the newspapers, this staged image of Elsie Janis is quite amusing.

Source: Boston Journal; Date: Dec. 6, 1906; Page: 7

Source: Farmer's Cabinet; Date: Jan. 31, 1856

Finally, consider this story, reprinted in the Farmer’s Cabinet of Amherst, New Hampshire on January 31, 1856. Credited at the bottom to Bayard Taylor’s Letters, it’s a first-person narrative of the dinnertime entertainment provided to Mr. Taylor and a companion during a “sojourn” in India:

“We were dining together in his bungalow, when a wandering Hindoo minstrel came along with his mandolin, and requested permission to sit upon the verandah and play for us.

“I was desirous of hearing some of the Indian airs, and my host therefore ordered him to perform during dinner. He tuned the wires of his mandolin, extemporized a prelude which had some very familiar passages, and to my complete astonishment began singing “Get out of the way, Old Dan Tucker!” The old man seemed to enjoy my surprise and followed up his performance with “Oh, Susannah,” “Buffalo Gals,” and other choice Ethiopian melodies, all of which he sang with admirable spirit and correctness.”

That’s cultural diffusion!

Be Sociable, Share!

“A Dastardly Outrage”: Kate Brown and the Washington-Alexandria Railroad Case

Wednesday, June 8th, 2011

[Kate Brown, a U.S. Senate laundress promoted to retiring room attendant, is most notable for winning the 1873 Supreme Court Case Railroad Company v. Brown. This spring Brown was the focus of a winning entry in a research competition sponsored by the Oxford African American Studies Center and the Gilder Lehrman Institute of American History. That winning entry on Brown, which will be published in the online African American National Biography, was researched and written by McLean (VA) High School students Brian Tong and Theodore Lin, who utilized the U.S. Congressional Serial Set among other sources. The article on Kate Brown below was written by Betty K. Koed, Assistant Historian in the U.S. Senate Historical Office. It appeared in the September 2008 issue of The Readex Report, where it was published with permission from Unum, a newsletter published by the Office of the Secretary of the United States Senate.]

As a Senate employee “in charge of the ladies’ retiring room,” Kate Brown worked hard, washing towels and laundering curtains. More than one senator commented on her “lady-like character” and described her as “an educated, intelligent, respectable, and to all appearance refined woman.” Although not known as a rebel or a troublemaker, on a chilly afternoon in February 1868 Kate Brown rebelled and stirred up a legal storm that went all the way to the Supreme Court.

It was nearly 3:00 p.m. on February 8, 1868, when Kate Brown pulled out her return ticket and stepped aboard a train to take her from Alexandria, Virginia, where she had been visiting a sick relative, back home to Washington, D.C. With her foot still on the step, Brown was accosted by the rail line’s private police officer, who called from the platform that she must take the other car. “This car will do,” the 28 year-old Brown replied quietly and stepped inside the train. At that point, as Brown later told a Senate committee investigating the incident, “the policeman ran up and told me I could not ride in that car… he said that car was for ladies.” Of course, Kate Brown was a lady, but she was also African American.

Source: U.S. Congressional Serial Set, 1817-1994. Click to open in PDF.

Because of her race, the policeman insisted that Brown was not “allowed to ride in that car anyhow; never was and never would be.” Not one to be deterred, Brown responded to the irate man: “I bought my ticket to go to Washington in this car, and I am going in it; before I leave this car I will suffer death.” A violent altercation followed, resulting in Brown being physically ejected from the train, thrown onto the platform, and dragged along the pavement. Fortunately another Senate employee, B. H. Hinds, a clerk for the Committee on Public Buildings and Grounds, arrived on the scene and came to her assistance. Hinds tried to convince Brown to ride in the “colored car,” but the presence of many disorderly men in the car frightened her. “I then went to her and told her that if she would get into the car,” Hinds explained to the committee, “I would go with her and see that she would not be molested.” Brown agreed, and the two traveled together to Washington where she sought medical help. The injuries she sustained kept her in bed for weeks to come.

The case quickly gained attention. “A dastardly outrage was perpetrated in Alexandria on Saturday afternoon,” commented one newspaper, “which is justly considered a disgrace to this age of civilization.” Senators Charles Sumner and Justin Morrill demanded an investigation and called for reparations. In the days that followed, the Senate Committee on the District of Columbia heard testimony from eyewitnesses to the violent incident, officials of the Alexandria and Washington Railroad Company, and from Brown’s doctor. Too badly injured to appear before the committee, Kate Brown gave testimony from her sick bed to committee chairman James Harlan.

In time, Brown sued the railroad company. The legal aspects of the case rested, in part, on the fact that the railroad’s de facto segregation policy was unevenly enforced. On the trip from Washington to Alexandria no such policy was in place, but in Alexandria the railroad’s management hired private officers to enforce segregation. Segregated trains were the norm throughout many states, but in the case of this particular rail line it was illegal. The 1863 congressional charter authorizing the railroad included—at the insistence of Charles Sumner—one key sentence: “And provided, also, That no person shall be excluded from the cars on account of race.” Since the railroad provided two identical cars on the line, the company responded with an argument of “separate but equal.”

The District of Columbia courts awarded $1,500 in damages to Brown. The rail company appealed, and the case eventually went before the Supreme Court. On November 17, 1873, in an opinion delivered by Justice David Davis, the Court held that the 1863 charter remained in force and that racial segregation on the line was not allowed under the charter. Davis dismissed the company’s “separate but equal” argument as “an ingenious attempt to evade a compliance with the obvious meaning of the requirement” of the 1863 charter and decided in favor of Kate Brown.

Brown remained a Senate employee until 1881. Except for the occasional footnote to “Railroad Company v. Brown” in legal histories, her act of rebellion has largely been forgotten; just one of many courageous attempts at civil disobedience that eventually fueled the civil rights movement of the mid-20th century. A growing interest in the history of Capitol Hill workers has brought new attention to the old story, however, and just recently the Congressional Black Associates honored Brown by naming one of its “Trailblazer Awards” in her honor.

Editor’s Note: Sources for the author’s research include the Report from the U.S. Congressional Serial Set on “the facts connected with the forcible ejection from the cars of the Alexandria and Washington Railroad of one of the employees of the Senate, on account of race…” An excerpt from this 26-page documentReport of the Senate Committee on the District of Columbia, June 17, 1868 (No. 131, 40th Congress, 2nd Session)offers this testimony from Mrs. Kate Brown.

Be Sociable, Share!

You are what you eat? Maybe, maybe not

Friday, June 3rd, 2011

Source: Morning Oregonian, Feb. 5, 1910

Low-fat? Low-calorie? Low-carb?

Headlines seem to grab the public’s interest every day with warnings about what and what not to eat. With food-related health issues and rising obesity rates getting so much attention in the United States and around the world, it is tempting to think that mankind’s struggles with diet are new. But of course they aren’t!

Source: Rising Sun (Kansas City, MO), May 26, 1905. Click to open in PDF.

Immortality—or at least the extension of natural life—has always been a goal of mankind, and links between health and diet have long been subjects of debate.

One of the world’s oldest food controversies centers not on carbohydrates, trans-fats or sugar. Instead, it’s a bit more basic: to eat or not to eat meat? Historical proponents of a vegetable diet have included such famous figures as Benjamin Franklin, Isaac Newton and Mahatma Gandhi, who all professed belief in non-animal diets at one time or another. In fact, claims have been made that herbivores live longer and have greater endurance than those whose diet includes meat.

Champions of a vegetable-only diet have looked to nutrition to not only improve their health but to predict and change their temperament as well. Been a bit cranky lately? Perhaps onions are to blame. Enjoying Popeye-like strength? You must be eating your spinach.

“Women who eat egg-plant become jealous. Carrots are conductive to a quick temper. String beans encourage profanity. Potatoes lead to laziness and spinach to activity. Onions invite a perpetual grouch, and green peas often lead to the divorce court by arousing the flirtatious instinct.”

Source: Duluth News Tribune (MN), April 10, 1910. Click to open in PDF.

One faction of vegetarians proclaims that killing animals for food is a form of murder. In this view, the taking of a life, any life, is in opposition to moral values and religious tenets. In the Duluth News Tribune article above, the recent president of the Chicago Vegetarian society claims that vegetable-based diets could eradicate human vices:

“Drunkenness and cruelty would be unknown. War would be unknown. There would be less sickness and less poverty. There would be little excuse for the existence of jails, and insane asylums would cease to exist.” 

Source: Trenton Sunday Advertiser (NJ), May 8, 1960

Health, mood changes and morality are but a few of the reasons that vegetarianism has enjoyed waves of popularity throughout history. Another recurring theme in abstinence from meat is simple: economics. Raising or purchasing meat can be expensive. Many allege that Benjamin Franklin’s vegetable diet was never a health-related choice but simply due to his penny-pinching ways.

Others have even predicted that the world’s population explosion would force a meatless society. Meat would someday become a luxury afforded by the elite few.

Source: Philadelphia Inquirer (PA), June 19, 1915

And so the debate continues.

Are meat eaters more likely to be peaceful, good natured, genteel folk? Maybe, maybe not – but if they are, it’s surely not a by-product of diet alone. Does a meatless diet translate into health benefits? The jury is still out on that hotly debated topic. As for economics? In these budget-conscious days, there are many proponents of cost-savings through vegetable diets.

“Yes, fresh produce generally costs more than canned or frozen, and organic produce and products cost more than their chemically grown counterparts.

“But when you compare the cost of standing rib roast or ground beef, tofu and even shiitake mushrooms look like a bargain.”

[Source: NewsBank--The Versatile Vegetarian: No-meat diet usually means savings, though quality doesn't come cheap, The Atlanta Journal and The Atlanta Constitution; Thursday, January 11, 1996]

Today, with no clear-cut answers, the choice to forgo meat is still very much an individual one; the reasons provided by vegetarians for their dietary choices are as varied as ever. Some have even put their own twist on vegetarianism by deciding NOT to decide. Flexitarians are those who are unwilling to adopt a meat-free life but still recognize the health and, often, budget savings associated with vegetable diets. They believe in cutting back the number of times meat is eaten and when, but do not eliminate it from their diets completely.

“Identifying yourself as an eater used to be simple. You either ate meat, or you didn’t.

“Now? Maybe you eat meat, but only certain kinds or only on certain days – or even certain hours. Or you don’t eat meat … except when you do.”

[Source: NewsBank--The occasional carnivore: Flexitarian eaters are finding they really can have it both ways, Charlotte Observer, The (NC), March 2, 2011]

Be Sociable, Share!

“Information Wanted” Advertisements: Searching for African American Family Members

Wednesday, May 4th, 2011

Guest blogger: Reinette F. Jones, Librarian, Louis B. Nunn Center for Oral History, University of Kentucky

Source: University of Kentucky

The Notable Kentucky African Americans Database (NKAA) was created at the University of Kentucky Libraries to share historical information about the many significant contributions of African Americans with Kentucky roots and ties. Several years ago, a library patron suggested that an entry about “Information Wanted” advertisements should be added to the NKAA Database. Although we were finally able to add such an entry this month, it almost did not happen.

For those who may not know, “Information Wanted” ads in newspapers were a way for individuals to search for missing family members. Much has been written about the use of such ads by African Americans during the period immediately after the signing of the Emancipation Proclamation and the Ratification of the 13th Amendment. However, there are no available data to substantiate the success rate for family members finding each other through the ads.

Source: Colored Tennessean; 10-07-1865; Nashville, Tennessee

Locating the ads in African American newspapers, and specifically in reference to Kentuckians in the 1860s, had been a slow, painstaking manual process that involved interlibrary loan requests for reels and reels of microfilm. On many days it was tempting to mark “Information Wanted” off the to-do list. Instead, it got bumped to the bottom of the list.

Source: The Freeman; 04-18-1891; Indianapolis, Indiana

But there was hope after UK Libraries obtained access to African American Newspapers, 1827-1998. Eyeballing newspapers on microfilm, frame by frame, for years was replaced with much quicker and comprehensive online searching. There were also several ‘Aha!” moments.

Source: Frederick Douglass' Paper; 06-30-1854; Rochester, New York

Source: Arkansas State Press; 06-24-1949; Little Rock, Arkansas

First, “Information Wanted” ads for Kentuckians were published in African American newspapers in California, Indiana, Louisiana, and other locations. Second, earlier ads seeking free Colored persons had been published since before the Civil War. Examples can be found in Frederick Douglass’ Paper in the 1850s. Third, the ads continued to be published in African American newspapers well into the 1940s, placed there by individuals searching for family and/or friends, and by agencies such as insurance companies searching for heirs. One example is an ad placed in the Arkansas State Press in 1949.

This new entry for “Information Wanted” ads is only one example of many long-awaited entries that have recently been completed. Other examples include the various entries on segregated press associations and their Kentucky connections. With these valuable additions to the Notable Kentucky African Americans Database, we have seen not only an increase in first-time users, but also a rise in the number of reference questions about African Americans in and from Kentucky.

Be Sociable, Share!

Civil War Imagery on Clipper Ship Sailing Cards

Monday, April 18th, 2011

Our guest blogger today is Bruce D. Roberts, author of Clipper Ship Sailing Cards (2007) and Mechanical Bank Trade Cards (2008). His new article on “The Development of the American Advertising Card” appears in the April 2011 issue of The Readex Report.

In the mid-nineteenth century, clipper ships sailed from New York and Boston to San Francisco. Shipping lines advertised voyages of clipper ships via sailing cards, most of which were issued between 1856 and 1868. The American Civil War fell right in the middle of this span, and Civil War imagery is seen on many cards. The examples below are found in American Broadsides and Ephemera, Series I, a Readex digital archive created in partnership with the American Antiquarian Society.

Invincible

Star-spangled banners and boughs of oak (strength) and laurel (victory) frame a Union general—bearing an idealized likeness to Ulysses S. Grant—on this Invincible card. Grant became widely known in the United States after his victory at Chattanooga in late 1863.

Rattler

Pro-Union imagery fills an 1864 Rattler card: Union soldiers, the American flag, and a huge gun emplacement that the Rebels couldn’t possibly touch. All is patriotic, including the African American (presumed freed) loading cannon balls.

Although turned away by the Union army at the start of the war, 200,000 blacks ultimately served in some capacity. Still, this is the only known clipper card design to include an African American.

Volunteer

This Volunteer card contains the ultimate in Civil War battle imagery. An armed standard bearer leads massed Union troops forward as a Confederate soldier falls. Rifles with fixed bayonets frame the image, as well as the flag-backed panel with the sailing information.

 

About the Author

Bruce D. Roberts has studied, collected, and written extensively about nineteenth-century advertising cards for more than three decades. His articles on “The Development of the American Advertising Card” and “Images of American Historical Figures on 19th-Century Clipper Ship Cards” appeared in The Readex Report. He has published Clipper Ship Sailing Cards (Lulu.com, 2007) and Mechanical Bank Trade Card (Lulu.com, 2008). Up next: a book on Ford’s late, unlamented car, the Edsel.

Be Sociable, Share!