Archive for the ‘Journalism History’ Category

Surviving the Titanic: The Stories Behind the Story

Friday, April 27th, 2012

No novelist would dare to picture such an array of beautiful climatic conditions—the rosy dawn, the morning star, the moon on the horizon, the sea stretching in level beauty to the skyline—and on this sea to place an ice-field like the Arctic regions and icebergs in numbers everywhere—white and turning pink and deadly cold,—and near them, rowing round the icebergs to avoid them, little boats coming suddenly out of the mid-ocean, with passengers rescued from the most wonderful ship the world has known. 

—Lawrence Beesley, The Loss of the S.S. Titanic (June 1912)

The Titanic. Source: George Grantham Bain Collection (Library of Congress).

In the hours after the Titanic sank, the press was faced with the task of telling a story about what had been thought impossible—the sinking of an unsinkable ship. Without substantive information—before the rescuing Carpathia returned to the United States—news bureaus around the world started running speculative accounts about the disaster.

View from the Carpathia of iceberg that sank the Titanic. Source: Library of Congress

For four days, as the Carpathia sailed to New York from the site of the sinking, carrying her original vacationing passengers and newly boarded Titanic survivors, three men—each instrumental to our knowledge of the event today—were embedded in one of the century’s most shocking stories: Arthur Rostron, English captain of the Carpathia; Lawrence Beesley, English scientist and Titanic survivor; and Carlos Hurd, an American reporter and Carpathia passenger who had been on vacation with his wife. Their sense of the tragedy, and their response to the news world during the days that followed, show us the different ways that individuals define and experience extreme trauma. 

In all of his years at sea, Arthur Rostron, 40 years old, had never needed to respond to a distress call. He had 23 years of naval experience, but was captain of the Carpathia for only three months when he was roused by Harold Cottam, his ship’s radio operator, in the early hours of April 15, 1912. Cottam awoke an annoyed Rostron in his cabin to convey the frantic QCD (or Quick Come Distress) call from the Titanic: “Hurry. Hurry! …. “sinking by the head.”

Carpathia Capt. Arthur Henry Rostron. Source: George Grantham Bain Collection (Library of Congress).

Captain Rostron responded immediately—moving full speed ahead toward the accident site. By the time the Carpathia arrived at the Titanic’s last reported location, Rostron had organized his ship and readied its passengers for the hysteria he anticipated. Electric lights were rigged along the Carpathia; gangway doors were opened; pilot ladders, nets, and ropes were ready to be dropped; hot drinks, soup, warm clothing, and blankets were on deck. Cargo cranes were ready to haul in the mail and the passengers’ luggage. The three doctors on board were set up at first aid stations in the ship’s dining rooms.

Rostron made sure Carpathia passengers would be segregated from Titanic survivors. He established a check-in process to create adequate documentation as survivors boarded. He told his crew to drink coffee before they had reached the disaster, warning it was going to be a long night ahead. Starting at 2:45 a.m., Rostron had the Carpathia blast “encouragement rockets” every 15 minutes to signal Titanic passengers and crew that help was on the way.

At 4:00 a.m., arriving at the Titanic’s last reported position, Captain Rostron stopped the Carpathia, shut down its engines—and felt sick. He saw nothing. No ship. No lights. No lifeboats or passengers. Nothing. Moments later, however, he spotted a dim green light on the horizon—a lifeboat with two passengers aboard. As the first survivor boarded the Carpathia, she confirmed to the stunned crew the shocking, horrific truth: the Titanic had sunk. As daylight broke, several lifeboats and a number of icebergs filled Rostron’s view. With icebergs visible in every direction, Rostron, a religious man, would later look back at the Carpathia’s speedy rescue dash and say that he, like the captain of the Titanic, was moving dangerously fast through the icebergs that morning, and the only thing to save his ship from being sliced open like the Titanic was “the hand of God.”

From the Cleveland Plain Dealer, April 17, 1912. Click to open full article. (Source: America's Historical Newspapers)

Lawrence Beesley, the rescued English scientist who had been a second-class Titanic passenger, described the morning of April 15 in his memoir The Loss of the S.S. Titanic:

As far as the eye could reach to the north and west lay an unbroken stretch of field of ice, with icebergs still attached to the floe and rearing aloft their mass as a hill might suddenly rise from a level plain. Ahead and to the south and east huge floating monsters were showing up through the waning darkness, their number added to moment by moment as the dawn broke and flushed the horizon pink. It is remarkable how “busy” all those icebergs made the sea look: to have gone to bed with nothing but sea and sky and to come on deck to find so many objects in the sight made quite a change in the character of the sea: it looked quite crowded; and a lifeboat alongside and people clambering aboard, mostly women, in nightdresses and dressing-gowns, in cloaks and shawls, in anything but ordinary clothes! Out ahead and on all sides little torches glittered faintly for a few moments and then guttered out—and shouts and cheers floated across the quiet sea. It would be difficult to imagine a more unexpected sight than this that lay before the Carpathia’s passengers as they line the sides that morning in the early dawn… 

Photocopy of handwritten account by Captain Roston. Source: George Grantham Bain Collection (Library of Congress).

By 8:30 a.m., with survivors on board and their lifeboats hauled on deck, Captain Rostron surveyed the exact site of the Titanic’s descent. All that remained of the once marvelous, unsinkable ship was a dense litter field of floating debris. Rostron asked an Episcopalian minister aboard to lead a service that morning—a prayer “out of respect to those who were lost and of gratitude for those who were saved.” In over four hours of searching the vicinity, Captain Rostron saw only one body floating on the ocean’s surface. 

Earlier that morning, Carlos Hurd, an American news reporter for the St. Louis Post-Dispatch, and his wife were second-class Carpathia passengers, traveling on vacation from the U.S. to Fiume (now Croatia). Hurd was awakened by a strange feeling. His cabin was cold, and the Carpathia was not moving. Confused by the silence of the engines and the clamor of hallway voices, he decided to investigate. He walked to what was the dining room the evening before but that morning appeared to be an infirmary. A Carpathia crewmember, pointing to a disheveled group of shivering refugees in the makeshift hospital, broke the news to Hurd: “From the Titanic; she’s at the bottom of the ocean.”

Carlos Hurd. Source: Missouri History Museum

From the Carpathia’s deck, Hurd then saw a number of approaching lifeboats filled with traumatized survivors. As they boarded—numb and in shock, and searching for loved companions—Carlos Hurd stopped his vacation and got to work.

Finding any scraps of paper he could, he began to interview survivors, many of whom were devastated women and children. Immigrants whose life savings fell to the bottom of the sea, women who could not speak English, all now were being towed to a new world without the men who had been guiding their futures. Hurd wrote down their various, sometimes contradictory, accounts of the Titanic’s descent. One survivor said Titanic captain E.J. Smith was last sighted standing atop the sinking ship’s bridge, as her decks washed away, before jumping into the sea—with no life preserver evident—and swimming away from a rescue attempt. Another account claimed Smith had shot himself on board as the ship went down. Hurd wrote of both accounts.

Yes, the Titanic’s string band played until the ship’s last moments. However, based on Hurd’s record of the sentiment of survivors, who, hearing the music, knowing the words of the last ballad—“So by my woes I’ll be, Nearer my God, to Thee”—some watching loved ones clinging to the rails of the sinking ship or flailing helplessly in the frigid sea—the music brought out more “strain” than relief. The combination of the music, the wretched groans of death, the beauty of the stars above, and the horrendous sight of the ship slowly ripping in two before sinking was too much to bear.

From the Salt Lake Evening Telegram, April 19, 1912. Click to open full article. Source: America's Historical Newspapers

From surviving Titanic quartermaster J.H. Moody, Hurd obtained some reasons for the accident. The Titanic had been moving full steam ahead, ignoring warnings from other vessels about the presence of icebergs. The trip was less a maiden voyage and more a race to reach New York in the best time. According to Moody, “…officers were striving to live up to the orders to smash the record.” 

In his account Beesley took issue with the way survivors were portrayed by the press, believing the scene on the Carpathia was intentionally over-blown for effect. He felt his own sense of the survivors’ states of mind was much more truthful than the press’s depiction:

Much that is exaggerated and false has been written about the mental condition of passengers as they came aboard: we have been described as being too dazed to understand what was happening, as being too overwhelmed to speak, and as looking before us with ‘set, staring gaze’ with the shadow of the dread event….scenes of women weeping and brooding over their loses hour by hour until they were driven mad by grief—all this has been reported to the press by people on board the Carpathia…the one thing that matters in describing an event of this kind is the exact truth…and my own impression of our mental condition is that of supreme gratitude and relief at treading the firm decks of a ship again.

From the Fort Worth Star-Telegram, April 19, 1912. Click to open full article. Source: America's Historical Newspapers

On board the Carpathia, Beesley and other Titanic survivors formed a committee to establish, among other things, a general fund for survivors from steerage, to present a loving cup to Captain Rostron, and to write a public letter suggesting better safeguards for ocean travel. Beesley felt it critical to accurately describe the accident—“to inform the English public”—and to bring perspective to the American press’s histrionic tendencies in reporting disasters:

It seemed well, too, while on the Carpathia to prepare as accurate an account as possible of the disaster and to have this ready for the press, in order to calm public opinion and to forestall the incorrect and hysterical accounts which some American reporters are in the habit of preparing on occasions of this kind. The first impression is often and most permanent, and in a disaster of this magnitude, where exact and accurate information is so necessary, preparation of a report was essential. It was written in odd corners of the deck and saloon of the Carpathia, and fell, it seemed very happily, into the hands of the one reporter who could best deal with it, the Associated Press. I understand it was the first report that came through and had a good deal of the effect intended.

As the Carpathia made its way back to its harbor with Hurd, Beesley, and the survivors on board, the fate of the Titanic was unknown to newsrooms around the world. A number of papers ran speculative accounts of what had happened: There was an accident, and the Titanic and all its passengers were being towed back to safety; the amazing Titanic sank but all on board were safe; the Titanic hit an iceberg and all passengers died at sea. Meanwhile, on board the Carpathia, Captain Rostron had forbidden his crew from talking to reporter Carlos Hurd. In addition, Hurd was not allowed to send his press dispatches via the ship’s wireless telegraph. In fact, although Rostron testified later that “absolutely no censorship” took place, much of the communication from the Carpathia was held back. In addition, messages to the Carpathia from the press on the mainland were intercepted.

From the Idaho Daily Statesman, April 19, 1912. Click to open full article. Source: America’s Historical Newspapers

Joseph Pulitzer, Hurd’s boss at the time, knew that Hurd was on board the Carpathia, and sent several radio messages to the Carpathia urging Hurd to interview Titanic survivors. Charles E. Chapin, city editor of New York’s Evening World, also knew Hurd was on board, and wanted to run Hurd’s first-hand story immediately upon the Carpathia’s return. Chapin had attempted to send a message to Hurd, asking the reporter to throw his dispatch from the ship’s deck to Chapin who would be in a tug boat in New York Harbor as the Carpathia arrived. Hurd never received any of these messages. In fact, Rostron had all messages intercepted and, in effect, had instituted a media blackout on his ship. Rostron apparently went so far as to confiscate all stationery aboard the Carpathia so that the reporter would be unable to capture accounts. Hurd was resourceful, using toilet paper, among other items, to write his story. His wife, who was also writing about the surviving women, took her husband’s scraps, accumulating shards of chronicles, which she brought to the bed in their cabin and sat on to avoid confiscation.

On the evening of April 18, 1912, the Carpathia approached New York. By this time, Carlos Hurd understood he would never be allowed to leave the ship with his story. As the New York lights became evident in a storm-filled sky, a number of tug boats filled with reporters approached the Carpathia. Hearing Hurd’s name being called through a megaphone from a tug, the Carpathia’s officers ordered Hurd to stay away from the rails. Ignoring their command, Hurd wrapped his story in a cigar box, sealed it closed, and attached champagne corks to the outside. Spotting Chapin in a tug, Hurd chucked the cigar box over the side of the Carpathia towards the city editor, but the box became ensnared in guy wires securing a Titanic lifeboat to the Carpathia. A sailor aboard the Carpathia, watching the drama unfold, worked his way to where the boxed dispatch had been snagged, grabbed the box, and threw it on to Chapin’s tug to the cheers of the Titanic survivors.

From the Miami Herald, April 30, 1912. Click to open full article. Source: America's Historical Newspapers

Beesley also described the media’s presence as the Carpathia entered New York Harbor:

Surrounded by tugs of every kind, from which (as well as from every available building near the river) magnesium bombs were shot off by photographers, while reporters shouted for news of the disaster and photographs of passengers, the Carpathia drew slowly to her station at the Cunard pier, the gangways were pushed across, and we set foot at last on American soil, very thankful, grateful people.

Carlos Hurd’s 5,000 word chronicle was immediately published, as were his wife’s interviews with Titanic survivors. Many New York papers ran first-hand accounts of what had happened aboard the Titanic in special editions on the day of the Carpathia’s arrival in New York. Hurd’s notoriety as a dedicated journalist who stopped at nothing to write of the tragedy of the century followed him for years to come. Captain Arthur Rostron received a number of prestigious awards for his rescue dash to the Titanic survivors. And, two months after its sinking, Lawrence Beesley’s memoir, The Loss of the SS Titanic, was published.

Beesley’s and Rostron’s apprehension about the role of the American press in such a major world event may have represented a general British regard for U.S. media. London, after all, was the hub of global news up until the sinking of the Titanic. Had the Carpathia picked up the survivors and brought them back to England, rather than New York, what would have become of Carlos Hurd’s story? Would Captain Rostron have been more cooperative about news dispatches coming and going to his ship if the correspondence to the Carpathia had come from London? Did New York newspapers become an established voice of international news simply because the Carpathia delivered the survivors of the Titanic to the news reporters of New York rather than London?

Lawrence Beesley in the Gymnastics Room of the Titanic

What is to be made of Lawrence Beesley’s sense that there was minimal drama in the immediate aftermath of the wreck of the century—an accident in which only 31% of those on board survived, and those survivors witnessed the stunning, horrific loss of so many lives? How could Beesley describe the response of survivors as reflecting “gratitude” and “relief,” without any prevalence of shock and hysteria on board the Carpathia? What effect does one’s cultural identity have on information portrayed—or not portrayed—during an epic international tragedy? Does a calamity really have an “exact truth,” as Beesley set out to provide in his memoir, or do multiple, disjointed, perspectives, such as those coming from Carlos Hurd, Captain Rostron, and Lawrence Beesley, give us a better understanding of the wreck of the Titanic and its aftermath?

Be Sociable, Share!

Just published — The Readex Report: April 2012

Tuesday, April 24th, 2012
In our latest issue: The exonerated executioner of a Native American sorceress; profiling a polymathic chess master; using a local newspaper archive to uncover an American city’s past; and unremembered inhumanity that sparked a world war.

Murder! Or the Remarkable Trial of Tommy Jemmy, 19th-Century Seneca Witch-Hunter and Defender of Indian Sovereignty

By Matthew Dennis, Professor of History and Environmental Studies, University of Oregon

I never read murder and mayhem stories in the newspaper.  Such sensationalist accounts have been a mainstay of the U.S. popular press since it was invented in the early American republic, and they remain a prominent feature today.  But the tawdry details of homicidal doings, breathlessly recounted, hold little appeal for me.  And yet a few years ago one such story caught my eye and drew me in, sending me on my own investigative journey. (read article)

The Untold Talent of Joseph Redding: Profiling a Polymathic Chess Expert

By Jerry Spinrad, Associate Professor of Computer Science, Vanderbilt University

The ability to access newspaper databases such as America’s Historical Newspapers has revolutionized research in the history and culture of chess. Some aspects of this research require detailed chess knowledge; for example, finding specific games of old masters or tracking changes in chess styles over the years. Other aspects of chess research require no specialized knowledge to appreciate: the atmosphere of chess clubs; rivalries between players, nationalities, and ethnic groups; and the often peculiar personalities of individual players. (read article) 

The Nanjing Atrocities Reported in the U.S. Newspapers, 1937-38

By Suping Lu, Professor and Library Liaison, University of Nebraska-Lincoln

The German invasion of Poland on September 1, 1939, is conventionally regarded as the starting point of World War II. However, war broke out much earlier in Asia. On July 7, 1937, after claiming that one its soldiers was missing, the Japanese launched attacks at the Chinese positions near the Marco Polo Bridge in a Beijing southwestern suburb. During the following weeks, the Japanese continued with their attacks in North China, capturing Beijing, Tianjin, and other cities in the region. (read article)

Loving the “City of Homes”… and its Historical Newspaper Archives

By Barbara Shaffer, Unofficial Historian of Springfield, Massachusetts

Many years ago my first drive through the residential neighborhoods of Springfield, Massachusetts, hooked me into a lifelong passion to know more of her and her people.  From viewing the 1870’s brick row houses on Mattoon Street to the gilded age mansions of Ridgewood and Maple Hill, it did not take a lot of imagination to conjure up a vision of the city’s glory days.  The architecture and beauty of the homes spoke clearly.  My research began. (read article) 

Subscribe today to receive the next quarterly issue of The Readex Report in your inbox. Browse previous issues in our archive. If you would like to comment, contribute or suggest an article, please email The Readex Report editor: readexreport@readex.com.
Be Sociable, Share!

The Titanic and Her Passengers: Using America’s Historical Newspapers to Uncover Tales of Tragedy and Love

Monday, April 23rd, 2012

Thousands of ships over centuries have lined the ocean floor, but even 100 years after it sank, the Titanic still fascinates. James Cameron’s 1997 critically acclaimed “Titanic”—the second bestselling film in U.S. history—was re-released this month in 3-D. The Titanic has also been the subject of several TV documentaries retelling and exploring the disaster. In its own time, no news event was more covered in exacting detail through the pages of the press. News of the Titanic’s shocking demise made front pages across the nation.

The Boston Journal (Source: America's Historical Newspapers)

The Idaho Daily Statesman (Source: America's Historical Newspapers)

The Titanic was the largest, most luxurious steamer ever built. She had opulent state rooms, expansive dining rooms, elegant smoking rooms, and a grand staircase. She even had elevators, libraries, a gymnasium, a squash court and a full orchestra. The Titanic was at the leading edge of engineering. Her builders assured that she was absolutely unsinkable, and her maiden voyage was to celebrate the triumph of technology over nature. In its April 30, 1912 issue, the Kalamazoo Gazette covered the features of the doomed ship extensively: 

Nineteen-year-old Miss Helen Monypeny Newsom from Columbus, Ohio had been taken on the cruise as part of a European “Grand Tour” designed to separate her from a suitor her parents disapproved of.  He was Karl Behr, a champion tennis player. At 27 years old, Behr was much older than Helen, already somewhat of a notorious celebrity, and therefore not deemed a good match for the young wealthy heiress. But Behr had boarded the ship in secret after feigning a business trip to Paris. The pair met up again on the Titanic’s maiden voyage to New York, where they continued their courtship.

Cleveland Plain Dealer (Source: America's Historical Newspapers)

However, unlike the doomed couple in Cameron’s movie, this pair of lovers had a happy ending. Both Helen and Karl ended up in Lifeboat 5 together, supposedly after Helen pleaded for his presence. Some newspapers later reported that Behr had proposed to Helen in the lifeboat. After narrowly escaping death, Helen’s parents apparently reversed their decision and gave approval for the couple to marry.

The tale of the couple’s courtship and survival was covered extensively in the newspapers. As one of the few happy endings of the tragedy, the couple’s wedding was also celebrated widely.

Cleveland Plain Dealer (Source: America's Historical Newspapers)

It is the tales of those aboard her—upper class, lower class, survivors and non-survivors—that make the story of the Titanic so compelling. To explore the extensive and often heart-rending coverage of the Titanic and her passengers in America’s Historical Newspapers, simply search “Titanic” in the headline field.

Be Sociable, Share!

Birth of a Star—Washington, D.C.’s Evening Star

Tuesday, April 3rd, 2012

The Evening Star Newspaper Buildings. Source: Library of Congress, Prints and Photographs Division

On December 16, 1852, a newspaper described by historian Fred A. Emery as “The Rock of Gibraltar in Washington Journalism” was born. The Evening Star was one of dozens of newspapers that sprang up in the mid-19th century in Washington, D.C. Like many of its kind, it began modestly as a four-page broadsheet printed by a hand press. Only 250 copies were made for its initial run. However, its owner, Captain Joseph Borrows Tate, had a big vision, which he and the editorial staff declared proudly in its Manifest: “The Star is to be free from party trammels and sectarian influences.”

Unlike other newspapers that were polemical and highly political in nature, the Star was to be neutral. It was also to be “devoted in an especial manner to the local interests of the beautiful city which bears the honored name of Washington.” In other words, the Star was to be a newspaper focused on largely local news and concerns. It was also to dedicate itself to the development and progress of the city of Washington.

Something of the idealism and high aspirations of the newspaper can be seen in this poem written specifically for its inaugural issue.

From the inaugural issue of The Evening Star (Dec. 16, 1852)

The newspaper was literally to be a guiding light for the city.

Over time, the Star’s professional stance and local emphasis distinguished it from rivals and drove its commercial success. For many years, it was regarded as the “paper of record” for our nation’s capital, drawing such stars as cartoonist Clifford K. Berryman away from its less successful rival, The Washington Post. Berryman’s work satirizing both Democrats and Republicans, presidents and poor men, and commenting in a humorous way on numerous divisive political issues, illuminated the pages of the Star until his death in 1949.

Readex is releasing a 70-year span of The Evening Star (1852-1922). For more information on this digital archive, please contact readexmarketing@readex.com.

Be Sociable, Share!

Etaoin and Other Shrdlu in the News

Wednesday, March 28th, 2012

LINO­TYPE: THE FILM, a new doc­u­men­tary by Doug Wil­son, is now being screened across the U.S.

The word Etaoin, which looks a bit like a strange name, appears many times in 19th and 20th century newspapers. This Etaoin was no relation to the virgin St. Etaoin, who lived near the Boyle and Shannon Rivers in western Ireland and whose feast—today a little remembered fact—was celebrated by medieval Irish Catholics on July 5 according to the Martyrology of Donegal. No, our Etaoin first appears in print, mainly but not exclusively in newspapers, after the introduction of the Linotype machine. Etaoin, sometimes found with the apparent surname of Shrdlu, was in fact the Linotype’s equivalent of the block-and-delete function in contemporary word processing programs except that the block, a block of solid type in fact, was often not deleted. Here is how Etaoin was born; but first a necessary word about the Linotype machine itself.

A Linotype keyboard. Keys are arranged by order of frequency as they appear in the English language. Upper and lower case letters have separate keys.

The Linotype, an American invention of German immigrant Ottmar Mergenthaler (1854–1899) in Baltimore, was a machine which cast a whole line of type in one action. From the days of Gutenberg and his predecessors, type had been laboriously set by hand—a slow, extremely labor-intensive, and expensive practice. The Linotype machine, more than anything else, is responsible for the enormous growth of not only newspaper publishing but all forms of publishing in the United States and throughout the world in the last decades of the 19th century. Here is a brief description of the Linotype itself: 

As the name implies, the Linotype is a machine that produces a solid “line of type.” Introduced about 1886, it was used for generations by newspapers and general printers. It is a one-man machine: the operator sits in front with the copy to be set at the top of the keyboard. Having adjusted the machine for the required point size and line length, the metal heated to the correct temperature—about 550 degrees Fahrenheit—he commences setting.

A light press of the key buttons actuates a mechanism that releases the matrices. These are small pieces of brass in which the characters or dies are stamped. The matrices travel from the magazine channels where they are housed, by means of a miniature conveyor belt, into the assembler box. This assembler box is the composing stick of the Linotype. After each word the operator touches the spaceband key which allows a spaceband to fall before setting the first letter of the following word. These spacebands are steel wedges and are used to spread out the line of matrices to the required width. When these spacebands have entered the assembler they are so positioned that their minimum width is between the matrices.

When the assembler is nearly full of matrices, the operator must decide whether to send the line away for casting at the finished words; or, if the [line] is long and obviously will not come in the measure, just where to divide it. As these decisions are made very speedily, it is necessary for the operator to be expert in the correct dividing of words, otherwise corrections necessitating the re-setting of two or more new lines will have to be made at a later stage. (http://www.woodsidepress.com/LINOTYPE.HTML)

It took years for Linotype operators to become proficient but because of the speed at which they worked, errors sometimes crept in. Enter Etaoian. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia:

ETAOIN SHRDLU (English pronunciation: /ˈɛtiˌɔɪn ˈʃɜrdlu/) is a nonsense phrase that sometimes appeared in print in the days of “hot type” publishing because of a custom of Linotype machine operators. It appeared frequently enough that it became part of the lore of newspapers. A documentary about the last issue of The New York Times to be composed in the hot-metal printing process (2 July 1978) was titled Farewell, Etaoin Shrdlu

The letters on Linotype keyboards were arranged by letter frequency, so “etaoin shrdlu” were the first two vertical columns on the left side of the keyboard. Linotype operators who had made a typing error could not go back to delete it, and had to finish the line before they could eject the slug and re-key a new one. Since the line with the error would be discarded and hence its contents did not matter, the quickest way to finish the line was to run a finger down the keys —a “run down,” as it was termed—creating this nonsense phrase.

If the slug with the error made it as far as the compositors, the distinctive set of letters served to quickly identify it for removal. Occasionally, however, the phrase would be overlooked and be printed erroneously. This happened often enough for ETAOIN SHRDLU to be listed in the Oxford English Dictionary and in the Random House Webster’s Unabridged Dictionary.

And here is one of the earliest examples of Etaoin in America’s Historical Newspapers—currently there are some 1,817 instances: 

From the Tacoma (Washington) Daily News (Oct. 13, 1893).

The worthy St. Etoian, however, got there [i.e., into the Readex digitized newspapers] first on Oct. 14, 1876 in the Irish American Weekly, thus antedating the invention of the Linotype machine by almost a decade: 

From New York's Irish American Weekly (Oct. 14, 1876)

And the good Shrdlu may be found, as of today, some 2,416 times in the Readex digital collection of American newspapers. Here is one example from the March 23, 1894 issue of the New York Tribune

From the New York Tribune (March 23, 1894)

Finally, an article by columnist John Barnes in the Augusta Chronicle of June 24, 1979, reminded readers of the sad fate of etoian shrdlu. 

From the Augusta (Georgia) Chronicle (June 24, 1979)

There are, needless to say, modern day counterparts to etoian shrdlu in our digital world, but that is another ETOAIN SHRDLU story.

Be Sociable, Share!

Announcing the digital edition of Washington, D.C.’s Evening Star, 1852-1922

Monday, March 19th, 2012

Old Evening Star Building on Pennsylvania Avenue, Washington, D.C. -- Source: Carol M. Highsmith Archive (Library of Congress)

This spring Readex will begin releasing a complete 70-year span of The Evening Star—one of the most influential newspapers in U.S. history. For more than a century, historians have regarded The Evening Star as the newspaper of record for the nation’s capital. Today, curators from leading newspaper repositories cite this long-running afternoon daily as one of their most heavily researched papers.

Man buying The Evening Star from newsboy -- Source: National Photo Company Collection (Library of Congress)

In digital form, this long-awaited archive of the Star will provide a searchable facsimile of every page of every issue from its founding on December 16, 1852 to December 31, 1922. Even in its earliest years, the Star was a conservative powerhouse, not afraid to buck Washington’s prevailing political winds. Its excellent reporting during the Civil War increased its popularity and circulation; even today Civil War historians frequently cite Star articles at length.

Students and scholars will have easy access to fresh perspectives on such topics as the Dred Scott decision, Lincoln assassination, founding of the first national association of unions and the National Woman Suffrage Association, establishment of the Civil Service, absorption of Georgetown into Washington, Supreme Court ruling of “separate but equal,” entry of American women into public life, passage of the Selective Service Act, segregation in the federal bureaucracy, and passage of both the 18th and 19th Amendments, which prohibited alcohol and gave women voting rights.

Headquarters, National American Woman Suffrage Association. Source: Harris & Ewing Collection (Library of Congress)

For more information about The Evening Star, or other American Newspaper Archives, please contact readexmarketing@readex.com.
 
Be Sociable, Share!

Readex announces Early American Newspapers, Series 8 and Series 9, 1832-1922

Thursday, March 15th, 2012

From Early American Newspapers, Series 9

This spring Readex will begin releasing two new series in its acclaimed Early American Newspapers collection. Early American Newspapers, Series 8 and Series 9 both feature full runs through 1922 of important, long-running titles from diverse regions of the United States. Each is notable for its depth of 19th- and early 20th-century news coverage, as exemplified by the large number of pages in every issue. Together, the titles in these two new series further expand the political, geographical and chronological depth of Early American Newspapers.  

From Early American Newspapers, Series 8

Series 8 provides many new titles of singular importance, including the Baton Rouge Advocate and its predecessors, vital forces in Louisiana’s capital city; Charleston’s News and Courier, one of the oldest daily papers in the South; predecessors of today’s Riverside Press-Enterprise, which chronicle California’s explosive growth; the Winston-Salem Journal, which became North Carolina’s first illustrated newspaper; and others. Also in Series 8 is previously unavailable coverage of titles in earlier series, including the Omaha Morning World-Herald, one of the Midwest’s foremost progressive newspapers. In addition, this new series features significant 19th-century titles that offer wide-ranging coverage of the Antebellum Period, when debates over slavery were reaching their peak in the American press. Among these titles is Frank Leslie’s Illustrated Newspaper, the most popular illustrated publication from the Antebellum Period to Reconstruction. 

From Early American Newspapers, Series 9

Series 9 delivers more outstanding historical newspapers, including The Boston Herald, one of America’s top three papers in the 1870s; predecessors of the San Diego Union-Tribune, this city’s most important newspaper; and the Bay City Times, which captures dramatic changes in Michigan as the automobile industry created a massive influx of immigrant workers. Also here are the Richmond Times-Dispatch, the newspaper of record for the capital of Virginia; predecessors of the Rockford Register Star, one of the largest papers in Illinois; the Marietta Journal, chronicling the challenges facing the South at the turn of the century; the Tampa Tribune, one of Florida’s most significant titles; and others. In addition, Series 9 offers significant 19th-century newspapers which chronicle the Jacksonian Era, the war with Mexico and Western expansion, the Civil War and Reconstruction.

For more information or to arrange a product trial, contact Readex at 800.762.8182 or readexmarketing@readex.com.

Be Sociable, Share!

The Connecticut Webster on Slavery (by Joshua Kendall)

Tuesday, March 6th, 2012

Joshua C. Kendall

The Connecticut Webster on Slavery

By Joshua Kendall, author of The Forgotten Founding Father: Noah Webster’s Obsession and the Creation of an American Culture

The pure-bred New Englander revered the Constitution. Though the eloquent statesman hated slavery, he sought to eradicate this evil without destroying the union. Division was anathema to him, as could perhaps be guessed from his ancestral name, Webster, which means “uniter” in Anglo-Saxon. And some three score and eight years before the outbreak of the Civil War, whose 150th anniversary we commemorated last spring, he advocated a moderate course designed to steer clear of bloodshed.

The man’s first name was Noah—not Daniel—and he hailed from Hartford. While his younger cousin, the Massachusetts legislator, would repeatedly take up the same mantle on the Senate floor, most notably in an impassioned speech on behalf of the Missouri Compromise in 1850, Noah Webster first spoke out against “the violated rights of humanity” back when Daniel was still in grade school.

Noah Webster by Sharples c 1798, 2nd Bank Portrait Gallery, Philadelphia. Source: Yale University

At the time of his death in 1843, Noah was the more famous Webster. After all, with his legendary speller first published at the end of the Revolution and his massive dictionary completed a half century later, he gave us our official language—American English. Moreover, this prolific writer was more than just America’s answer to the great British lexicographer, Samuel Johnson. In the mid-1780s, as George Washington’s personal policy advisor, he authored a series of influential essays in support of America’s founding document. A decade later, at President Washington’s behest, the Webster, whom Daniel once dubbed the “true likeness” of the clan, became the editor of New York City’s first daily newspaper. However, by the 1940s, when Daniel Webster was cross-examining the Devil in the Hollywood version of Stephen Vincent Benet’s short story, the Connecticut Webster was largely forgotten. Daniel, most Americans began to assume, must also have been a wordsmith.

Noah Webster founded New York's first daily newspaper, American Minerva, and edited it for four years.

During the economic downturn of the early 1790s, while toiling as a lawyer in his hometown, Noah Webster joined the fledgling Connecticut Society for the Promotion of Freedom. In the first wave of the antislavery movement, similar abolition groups cropped up in states from Massachusetts to North Carolina. In 1793, at the Connecticut society’s annual meeting, Webster delivered a memorable speech, “Effects of Slavery on Morals and Industry,” later expanded into a widely disseminated 56-page pamphlet.

Advertisement from Connecticut Courant for Webster's influential anti-slavery pamphlet. Source: America’s Historical Newspapers

To issue yet another moral condemnation of slavery, Webster felt, would be an insult to the “understandings of my enlightened fellow citizens” of Connecticut. Instead, he crafted a carefully nuanced argument, which emphasized how the barbaric institution dehumanized everyone. “The exercise of uncontrolled power,” he noted, “always gives a peculiar complexion to the manners, passions and conversation of both the oppressor and the oppressed.” Citing mountains of demographic data, Webster also maintained that slavery would continue to be a drain on macroeconomic productivity. In America where 700, 000 of the four million inhabitants were then slaves, exports per capita were about two thirds of the comparable figure in Great Britain where slaves had never comprised more than a tiny fraction of the population. “Men will not be industrious,” this keen observer of human nature concluded, “without a well founded expectation of enjoying the fruits of their labor.”

Title page of Effects of Slavery on Morals and Industry. Source: America’s Historical Imprints

As fervently as Webster wanted to rid his country of this scourge, he advised caution. “An attempt to abolish it [slavery] at a single blow,” he warned, “would expose the whole political body to dissolution.” To hammer home his point, he footnoted Cicero’s contention that “a remedy which cures the diseased parts of the state should be preferable to one which amputates them.” To heal America, Webster proposed a two-pronged solution. For the eight states north of Delaware, which then housed a total of only 40,000 slaves—four fifths of whom resided in New York and New Jersey—he recommended gradual abolition. For the six southern states, he urged plantation owners to “raise the slaves, by gradual means, to the condition of free tenants.” This policy, he was forced to concede, was far from satisfactory, as it probably would not translate into freedom for generations. However, given that the ratio of slaves to free inhabitants was a staggering 1 to 2.5 throughout the south, the Connecticut scribe saw no other “method for meliorating the condition of the blacks without essentially injuring the slave, the master and the public.”

While Southerners, of course, ignored this New Englander, Northerners paid close attention. Several years later, prodded by Webster’s Federalist party ally, Alexander Hamilton, who wrote frequent editorials for his paper, the New York legislature passed a law whereby all male slaves born after July 4, 1799 would be freed upon their 28th birthday. By 1804, every northern state, which hadn’t already outlawed slavery, had passed such a gradual emancipation law. In 1828, to illustrate the meaning of the term in his dictionary, Webster could proudly assert, “Slavery no longer exists…in the northern states of America.”

Soon after the publication of his “great book,” the abolition movement, which had lain dormant for decades, made a comeback. This time around, its leaders such as William Lloyd Garrison demanded immediate emancipation. By then, Noah Webster was in his 70s, and he feared a radical shake-up of his country more than ever. Of New England’s second generation of Abolitionists, he wrote in 1837: “They are absolutely deranged….slavery is a great sin and a great calamity, but it is not our sin.”

Given the bloody carnage that was to follow a quarter century later, the trepidation about taking decisive action expressed by both Websters was not entirely unwarranted.

About the Author

An award-winning freelance journalist, Joshua Kendall has written for numerous publications including The Boston Globe, Business Week, Psychology Today, The Wall Street Journal and The Nation. His first book was a biography of Peter Mark Roget, the Victorian doctor and wordsmith. His most recent book, The Forgotten Founding Father: Noah Webster’s Obsession and the Creation of an American Culture, was released in paperback on March 6, 2012. Joseph J. Ellis calls Kendall’s latest “by far the best, and best written, life of Webster,” and James McGrath Morris says, “Kendall single-handily rescues the least-known founder of American politics and culture and gives him his long overdue place of importance.” The article above first appeared in the February 2012 issue of The Readex Report.

Be Sociable, Share!

Librarian turned award-winning biographer hails research value of historical newspapers

Thursday, March 1st, 2012

Paperback publication date: March 1, 2012

Kate Buford, who began her career as a Wall Street law librarian with an MLS from Columbia University, has written the first comprehensive biography of Jim Thorpe, widely regarded as America’s greatest all-around athlete. Library Journal called Buford’s work “the definitive biography of a legendary figure in American history, in and out of sports. An essential purchase.” Among the awards received by Native American Son: The Life and Sporting Legend of Jim Thorpe (Knopf, 2010) are the Society for American Baseball Research 2011 Larry Ritter Award, the Professional Football Researchers Association 2010 Nelson Ross Award, and Editors’ Choice from The New York Times.

Discussing the extensive research behind her acclaimed biography, which is being published today in paperback by University of Nebraska Press, Buford writes:

Kate Buford will be a panelist in the “Creating a Beautifully Written Biography” session at the Third Annual Compleat Biographer Conference this May.

I sure wish the ever-expanding resource of digitized historical newspaper archives had been available in its present form to draw on in 2002 when I started the research for Native American Son. Back then it was a thrill (maybe best appreciated by other biographers) to order microfilm reels of The Raleigh [N.C.] News and Observer on inter-library loan for the summers of 1909 and 1910. When the boxes came in, I got to spend hours sitting at the microfilm reader in the Greenburgh public library in Westchester County, New York, tracking, frame by celluloid frame, Jim Thorpe’s unsuccessful attempt to break into major league baseball by playing for two minor league teams in the Tar Heel State.

Those two summers would cost him the two gold medals for the pentathlon and decathlon he won two years later at the 1912 Stockholm Olympics. A newspaper scoop in The Worcester [Mass.] Telegram in January 1913 revealed that Thorpe was a—wait for it—professional because he had played for money for those two summers and thus had been unqualified to compete as an amateur.

Kate will be writing about that scoop and the ensuing rush to judgment in an upcoming issue of The Readex Report. She’ll look at how what many still regard as sports’ biggest scandal was played out in the newspapers of the time. To subscribe to our quarterly e-publication, use this simple form.

Be Sociable, Share!

Franklin scholar uses America’s Historical Newspapers to trace an ingenious hoax

Thursday, February 16th, 2012

Carla Mulford, Dept. of English, Penn State University

In December 2008 an essay about one of Benjamin Franklin’s cleverest hoaxes was published in The Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society. Written by distinguished Franklin scholar Carla Mulford, “Benjamin Franklin’s Savage Eloquence: Hoaxes from the Press at Passy, 1782” was awarded the prestigious William L. Mitchell Prize from the Bibliographical Society of America on January 27, 2012.

As explained in the Bibliographical Society’s press release, Dr. Mulford’s article…

Source: Proceedings of the American Philosophical Association (Dec. 2008)

concerns the printing, distribution, rhetorical strategy, and impact of Franklin’s bogus Supplement to the Boston Independent Chronicle, no. 705, dated 12 March 1782.  In its distributed second impression, this single-leaf extra contained two principal texts by Franklin that purport to be by others.  On the front is a report by an American Captain, Samuel Gerrish, on his capturing a cargo of human scalps taken in recent years “by the Senneka Indians from the Inhabitants of the Frontiers,” with incriminating documentation transcribed within the article (including an Indian’s note asking that the scalps be sent “over the Water to the great King” with the starving Indians’ request for better treatment). The second item, not present in the undistributed first printing of the hoax as a single-sided broadside, was a purported letter by John Paul Jones to the British administrator Sir Joseph Yorke, who had previously failed to honor a prisoner exchange agreement with Jones and had written disparaging testimonies regarding Jones and the related events. To fill out the pages of the paper, the hoax also contains advertisements typical of the Boston Independent Chronicle

Click to open prize-winning essay in PDF.

In her prize-winning essay, Mulford, Associate Professor of English at Penn State University and Founding President of the Society of Early Americanists, explains the “continued life of the first article (on the harvest of scalps),” which soon appeared in American newspapers and which was reprinted at least 34 times, “well into the nineteenth century, when it had the unintended effect of justifying hostilities to American Indians.” An appendix of “Nineteenth-Century Newspaper Re-Publications of the Supplement” concludes her study.

Among the high praise from the judges was this comment:

Dr. Mulford “displays a remarkable knowledge and control of the vast Franklin materials, primary and secondary, along with an excellent, precise bibliographical approach. A rare combination.”

Professor Mulford recently acknowledged the benefits of using Readex databases in her research for this article and her forthcoming book, Benjamin Franklin and the Ends of Empire:

America’s Historical Newspapers enabled me to trace the different contemporary and then later uses of the ‘scalping’ hoax. By way of background, let me point out that Franklin was profoundly troubled that the British military was paying Native peoples to create devastation on British Americans’ homes and to kill the people. Franklin had spent much of his time while in Pennsylvania (decades earlier) figuring out how best to negotiate peacefully with Indians. So he was outraged when the Indians became (by necessity and in an effort to preserve their own sovereignty) involved in the fray between Britons in North America and those in England. The Readex database made it possible for me to discover the posthumous uses to which Franklin’s hoax had been put, and, with terrible irony, I discovered that it was used to promulgate a form of Indian-hating by Americans in North America. The original target, British peoples in England, was lost, and the Indians received the central, negative thrust of the hoax. I think Franklin would have found this appalling. So I traced the uses of the hoax and made a record of it, so that others might see how periodical circulation takes on a life of its own.

Prof. Mulford is preparing an article about her use of the Archive of Americana, including Early American Imprints and Early American Newspapers.  Look for it in a future issue of The Readex Report.

Be Sociable, Share!