Archive for the ‘New Collections’ Category

Newly Discovered Materials Enrich Early American Imprints

Monday, October 10th, 2011

Nearly 2,000 rare printed items from the Library Company of Philadelphia—previously unavailable in the Evans and Shaw-Shoemaker series—have been digitized by Readex.

Available in two parts, Supplements from the Library Company of Philadelphia, 1670-1819 may now be seamlessly searched and browsed within Readex’s fully integrated America’s Historical Imprints collection—the definitive resource for researching every aspect of 17th- and 18th-century America.

Representing the largest collection of early American imprints to have been identified and cataloged during the last 40 years, these new series of remarkable printed materials include items relevant to a host of humanities topics and are representative of numerous genres of colonial print. These newly discovered materials are particularly valuable for studying popular culture; many emanate from the middle and lower orders of society.

Early American Imprints, Series I:

Supplement from the Library Company

of Philadelphia, 1670-1800

Sample DocumentsTitle ListRequest Trial


Early American Imprints, Series II:

Supplement from the Library Company

of Philadelphia, 1801-1819

Sample DocumentsTitle ListRequest Trial

 “These collections are rich in imprints that have never before been available in the digital Early American Imprints because they came to light after the completion of the bibliographies on which it was based,” says James N. Green, the Library Company’s Librarian. “By adding them to their Archive of Americana, Readex has made it even more truly the national digital library of early American print.”

 

For more information or to arrange a product trial, please contact Readex at 800.762.8182, sales@readex.com or use this form.

Be Sociable, Share!

The Digital Detective: Tracking Criminals When the Trail Runs Cold (by Stephen Mihm)

Thursday, October 6th, 2011

[The article below by University of Georgia professor Stephen Mihm first appeared in The Readex Report (Sept. 2008). Last month, an op-ed by Mihm headlined "The Biographer's New Best Friend" was published in The New York Times Sunday Review section. In his Times piece, Mihm quotes historians and biographers James McGrath Morris, Joshua Kendall and Graham Hodges to help explain why "Readex's America's Historical Newspapers...has the potential to revolutionize biographical research."]

The Digital Detective: Tracking Criminals When the Trail Runs Cold

By Stephen Mihm, Associate Professor of History, University of Georgia

When I began work on a history of American counterfeiting between the Revolution and the Civil War, I was faced with some peculiar research problems. With a few rare exceptions, counterfeiting during this period was a crime that was not prosecuted by federal authorities. The problem was instead left to state and local law enforcement officials who were often outnumbered and incompetent. This was partly a consequence of the fact that the paper money in circulation originated not with the federal government, but with hundreds of state-chartered banks. But it was also a reflection of the relative weakness of the federal government’s policing.

And therein lay a serious problem, not only for the police of the day, but for the historian who would attempt to reconstruct this kind of criminal activity. Counterfeiting involved vast numbers of players spread out across state and even national lines. This meant that local law enforcement officials often operated in the dark as to the scope and scale of the network of manufacturers, distributors, retailers and passers of bogus bills. Local law enforcement records—what few have survived—often provide but a fleeting snapshot of an individual counterfeiter who typically posted bail and fled, never to be seen again. What, then, is a historian to do, particularly a historian who wants to reconstruct the entire criminal careers of some of these colorful individuals?

When I began research for A Nation of Counterfeiters, I started keeping tabs on the names of criminals who surfaced at multiple times and places in the historical record. But this is like looking for the proverbial needle in a haystack: you could spend many lifetimes reading through newspapers and other sources, trying to track your quarry. The advent of a new generation of digital resources—particularly America’s Historical Newspapers—made life much easier, and netted results that not only surprised me, but would have stunned the detectives and bounty hunters who spent so much time unsuccessfully tracking counterfeiters in the early republic.

Take a man like Seneca Paige. The epitaph of his gravestone notes that he was a “poor man’s friend,” a not-so-subtle reference to the fact that he was the head of a counterfeiting syndicate that straddled the border between Vermont and Canada. Paige was a notoriously slippery individual, someone who constantly escaped from the clutches of the law. That initially made tracking him almost absurdly difficult. I made a few serendipitous finds in records on both sides of the border, but when I ran searches for “Seneca Paige” or “Seneca Page” in millions of pages of America’s Historical Newspapers, some interesting things turned up.

Paige was everywhere. He showed up first in September 1809, where he was busted in Jersey City after trying to pass a counterfeit note.

He wriggled free in that instance, but was again in the news in April 1812, when a thousand dollar reward for his capture had the desired effect, and Paige was escorted to Baltimore to face charges.

The same key word searches revealed that after being indicted and committed to jail in Baltimore, he made his escape—only to be captured again a year later in Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania.

Judging from the news reports, the local authorities weren’t aware that Paige had already escaped from other jails: how could they be? Local law enforcement officials didn’t correspond with one another on a regular basis, and they didn’t have access to every newspaper in the Union. If they had, they might not have been surprised at what happened next: Paige escaped from prison once more, “without breaking any locks or bolts,” as the Commercial Advertiser reported in August 1816.

Paige chose not to push his luck at this point: he apparently relocated to Canada, where he quickly assumed leadership of the so-called “Canada Counterfeiting Company.” And yet news of Paige’s movements continued to drift south of the border, sometimes in court papers, but just as often in the pages of newspapers.

In this particular case, finding Paige required expanding the search, dropping his first name and simply running searches for articles containing both “Paige” or “Page” and “counterfeiter.” When I did this, I found a curious mention of him in a Baltimore newspaper from 1826.

It seems that a man was caught in New Haven with a shipment of counterfeit money concealed in a mahogany dressing case. When examined, he confessed that he had received the bills and the case from “a Mr. Page, in Dunham, Canada.” Dunham was the town where most counterfeit money was manufactured in the 1820s. Again, a serendipitous find, but one that would have been impossible before the advent of digital resources.

America’s Historical Newspapers and other digital resources are extraordinarily powerful tools, enabling historians to reconstruct the movements of fugitives with startling precision. Indeed, with a few keystrokes, a historian working in the 21st century can often reconstruct the movements and careers of obscure criminals two centuries ago with comparable—if not greater—accuracy than the constables and cops who fruitlessly chased them in their own time.

More about the author

Stephen Mihm is the author, with Nouriel Roubini, of Crisis Economics: A Crash Course in the Future of Finance (Penguin Press, 2010) and A Nation of Counterfeiters: Capitalists, Con Men, and the Making of the United States (Harvard University Press, 2007). He is also the co-editor, with Katherine Ott and David Serlin, of Artificial Parts, Practical Lives: Modern Histories of Prosthetics (NYU, 2002).

Be Sociable, Share!

Hello, Comrade Philby

Wednesday, September 28th, 2011

Kim Philby on USSR commemorative stamp

In “Just Browsing: Cool Items from the Past,” I shared several unexpected items I recently stumbled upon in America’s Historical Newspapers.

I don’t however expect to find such wonderful things in Foreign Broadcast Information Service Daily Reports. What’s cool there comes more from the benefits of hindsight than sheer surprise. And that backward look lets the propagandistic nature of some of the documents shine through.

One I recently read is the somewhat hagiographic interview with Kim Philby, the former high-ranking member of British intelligence agent who spied for and later defected to the Soviet Union. The interview, first published in the Russian daily newspaper Izvestiya on Dec. 19, 1967, was translated into English for publication in FBIS supplement “MATERIALS ON 50TH ANNIVERSARY OF SOVIET STATE SECURITY ORGANS, FBIS-FRB-68-007-S on 1968-01-10. Supplement number 2”

Titled “Hello, Comrade Philby,” the article starts with a street scene in chilly Moscow:

Click to open page 1 in PDF.

“It was on a frosty morning, and the haze of the night had not yet departed from the snow-covered streets. The trees on Gogol Avenue were covered with hoarfrost. Muskovites rubbing their cheeks and stamping their feet stood in a queue at a trolleybus stop. A new day began with all its worries and fuss. Cars were also in a hurry, one outrunning the other.

“A man of medium height, no longer young, but still strong, leisurely strolls over the sidewalk inhaling the frozen air. He wears a warm, fur-lined overcoat and a fur cap. The man sincerely enjoys this morning, the frost, and the rapid stream of pedestrians. Sometimes people bump into him. ‘Pardon me,’ they say in a hurry. ‘Never mind,’ he replies, speaking with a light accent. He looks with interest at the little boys with rucksacks on their backs who are throwing snowballs at each other on the avenue. He always smiles, this man with a kind and frank face.

“Who is he? Why does he smile? What unusual thing has he discovered on the avenue, in the frost-covered trees, on that ordinary Moscow morning? The little children on the avenue, the passers-by on the sidewalk, the fashionable girls — to which of them would it occur that the person smiling at them this morning has had a most amazing life history? He used to be called a puzzle of a man, and his life was called a rebus. There were many years, whole dozens of years, 30 years of endless puzzles, a life as intricate as a labyrinth.”

It then segues into a description of a 1951 meeting in Washington, D.C., at which Allen Dulles, Frank Wisner and other American intelligence leaders awaited an important British guest. Arriving exactly on schedule, Philby took his place at their table. He listened carefully to the outline of a major operation in which dissidents would infiltrate an Eastern European country, and he offered suggestions to help polish the plan. The article explains that this top-secret operation failed because Dulles:

“…even in his most nightmarish dreams […] would not have imagined that on that August morning a cadre worker of the Soviet intelligence service was sitting at the table opposite him in the office. The Soviet intelligence agent had accomplished another task of the Center.

“And now it was our turn to sit at a table with Kim Philby,” the article continues, providing a further description of the Soviet spy:

“He is very calm and slow[,] his large grey head with hair parted in the middle rests on strong shoulders, his masculine, weatherbeaten face is softened by bright, slightly twinkled eyes. When he smiles, wrinkles run from the corners of his eyes to the temples, giving his face an even warmer expression.”

The interview, with copious direct quotes from Kim Philby, follows. Where he was born, his education, his career before recruitment in the Soviet and then the British intelligence services are covered.

“It was in my work in the Soviet intelligence service that I found the form of this struggle. I thought at that time, and still think, that in this work I served my own British people, too.”

He tells the following from his days as a reporter during the Spanish Civil War, at which point his coverage was favorable to Franco.

“At that time I lived in Bilbao. Once, an officer from Franco’s staff came to me, seated me in his car, and drove me to the fascist headquarters in Burgos. They showed me into a hall in which there was a group of ridiculously bombastic generals. In the center was the ‘Generalissimo’ himself. I noticed at that time that all of them, including Franco himself, were rather short men. I was introduced. After a couple of minutes, the ‘caudillo’ extraordinarily solemnly presented this very same, cross to me. It later came in very handy for my work: of all Western journalists, I was one of the few awarded with this exotic order. When joining the British ‘intelligence service,’ the cross, too, played its role.”

Philby also discusses his pre-World War II activities in Germany and his wartime rise in the British service. After the war he was sent to Turkey, where his life was hectic. It’s busy when you’re working both sides of the street.

“It was much easier for James Bond in the novels of my old friend Ian Fleming; he still managed to find time for merry holidays and love affairs,” joked Philby.

I love the next question the interviewer poses: “You mean you knew Fleming also?”

“Of course, since he also worked in the secret service as deputy director of naval intelligence. Also employed in intelligence was Graham Greene, who was also a colleague of mine at that time. Today he is a truly great and respected writer.”

A quick discussion of Philby’s taste in literature follows, and then it’s back to his career. When asked about American intelligence elite, he gives dismissive estimates of two CIA directors—Allen Dulles (“considerate in dealing with people, but essentially showed a haughty attitude toward them”) and Richard Helms (“more politician than a specialist in his business”). Philby continues:

“But one person who really made an indelible impression on me,” he continued, “was [FBI Director J. Edgar] Hoover’s deputy, Mr. Ladd. This astoundingly dull person was quite seriously trying to convince me that Franklin Roosevelt, the former president, had been a Komintern agent!”

The interview concludes with this ringing statement:

“We congratulate him with all our hearts on the occasion of the coming jubilee, the 50th anniversary of the VCHK-KGB organs, the holiday of the Soviet Cheka members. This is his holiday too, after all.”

The rest of the FBIS Supplement is cool, too. The articles come from Pravda, Red Star, Soviet Union, Trud as well as Izvestiya—all packaged together to let U.S. government readers see a wide degree of coverage of the anniversary. It opens with a speech to KGB personnel by KGB director Yuri Andropov, who would become leader of the U.S.S.R. fifteen years later:

“Remarkable Chekist cadres, inspired by the ideals of October, grew up and were tempered in the struggle against the enemies of Soviet power. The image of the Chekist as a passionate revolutionary, a man of crystal-clear honesty and vast personal courage, relentless in the struggle against the enemies, stern in his duty, but human and ready to sacrifice himself for the people’s cause to which he has devoted his life—an image which prevails among the people—is associated precisely with the activity of these men.”

Andropov’s style makes the Philby article read as if it came out of movie fan magazine.

For more information about Foreign Broadcast Information Service Daily Reports, please contact readexmarketing@readex.com.  To request a free trial for your institution, please use this form.

Be Sociable, Share!

Announcing a Readex Online Seminar: Newspaper Archives for Academic Research and Teaching

Friday, September 23rd, 2011

Readex now offers complimentary 45-minute Webinars led by experts in the history and academic use of newspaper archives. We invite you and your colleagues to register for a lively fall session in which you’ll learn about the fascinating and unique histories of a series of major American newspapers.

We’ll also explore such topics as:

• Why are newspapers often described as not only history’s first draft but also the heart of a community?

• How can general reference and local history researchers best utilize searchable newspaper archives?

• How are teachers at academic institutions of all types and sizes now using newspaper archives in their classrooms?

• How has access to newspaper archives facilitated important published research on American life and history?

• How have the editorial perspectives of individual newspapers changed over time, and how have their political slants shaped and influenced coverage?

• How has news reporting itself developed over time, and how do such transformations mirror evolving social values?

• How can all users more effectively search and enjoy browsing historical newspaper archives?

American newspapers—with their eyewitness reporting, editorials, advertisements, obituaries and human interest stories—have preserved essential records and detailed accounts of nearly every facet of regional and national life. Now searchable online, these regionally diverse archives span centuries of social, cultural, political, military, business, sports and literary history, providing students and scholars with invaluable original reporting and fresh, local-level insights.

Michelle Harper

Our host and key speaker has nearly 15 years of high-level experience with the digitization of archival collections, particularly historical newspapers. She has worked for several leading companies in roles such as Vice President, History Publishing; Director, Special Collections; Director, Product Management; and Publisher, Historical Newspapers.

Be Sociable, Share!

Now online: African American Periodicals – from slavery to the modern era

Monday, September 12th, 2011

African American Periodicals, 1825-1995

The essential new complement to African American Newspapers, 1827-1998

African American Periodicals, 1825-1995 features more than 170 wide-ranging periodicals by and about African Americans. Published in 26 states, the publications include academic and political journals, commercial magazines, institutional newsletters, organizations’ bulletins, annual reports and other genres.

These diverse periodicals—which have shaped, and in turn been shaped by, African American culture—will enable new discoveries about lives of African Americans as individuals, as an ethnic group and as Americans. Like African American Newspapers, 1827-1998, this new collection is based upon James P. Danky’s monumental African-American Newspapers and Periodicals: A National Bibliography.

Drawn from matchless holdings of the Wisconsin Historical Society, African American Periodicals ranges over more than 150 years of American life, from slavery during the Antebellum Period to the struggles and triumphs of the modern era. Beyond offering opinions on issues and events of the day, the rare titles in African American Periodicals capture the voices of African American social, political, religious, literary and business history. The publications brought together here—many short-lived and not collected by most libraries—brim with surprises and untold stories.

For more information or to request a collection trial at your institution, please contact Readex at 800.762.8182 or readexmarketing@readex.com.

Be Sociable, Share!

Ernest Hemingway: In His Time

Monday, July 11th, 2011

Source: American Newspaper Archives / America's Historical Newspapers

July of 2011 marks 50 years since the suicide of American author and Nobel Laureate Ernest Hemingway. Hemingway ranged far from his Oak Park, Illinois roots as a journalist in Kansas City, an ambulance driver on the Italian front in World War I, an expatriate in Paris in the 1920s, and a war correspondent in the Spanish Civil War and World War II. He hunted for big game in Africa and went deep sea fishing in the Caribbean. Along the way he wrote a handful of stories and novels that defined his generation.

Hemingway’s celebrity was of a different order than the fame of other American writers of his time. He had homes in Key West and then Cuba, went hunting and fishing, made appearances in the gossip columns, had multiple wives and wrote celebrity journalism. He used his fishing vessel to hunt for German subs during World War II. What he did was news. Even when, strictly speaking, it wasn’t really news at all. Following are some examples.

Here he’s introduced in 1930 to readers of the Seattle Daily Times in a gossip column:

Click to read full page in PDF.

A visit to New Orleans in 1936 is front-page news in the Times-Picayune:

Click to read full page in PDF.

He gets into fights with other authors, including this one with Max Eastman in the office of the fabled Scribners’ editor Maxwell Perkins, as seen in this 1937 item from the Springfield Sunday Union and Republican:

Click to read full page in PDF.

His first three wives were all from St. Louis – giving him the blues:

Click to read full page in PDF. Source: The Sunday Oregonian; Date: 11-11-1945.

For his literary contributions, he deserved significant coverage. His terse style changed American literature. This is the opening of Henry James’ 1881 novel The Portrait of a Lady:

Under certain circumstances there are few hours in life more agreeable than the hour dedicated to the ceremony known as afternoon tea. There are circumstances in which, whether you partake of the tea or not—some people of course never do — the situation is in itself delightful. Those that I have in mind in beginning to unfold this simple history offered an admirable setting to an innocent pastime. The implements of the little feast had been disposed upon the lawn of an old English country-house, in what I should call the perfect middle of a splendid summer afternoon. Part of the afternoon had waned, but much of it was left, and what was left was of the finest and rarest quality. Real dusk would not arrive for many hours; but the flood of summer light had begun to ebb, the air had grown mellow, the shadows were long upon the smooth, dense turf.

Compare this to Hemingway’s opening of A Farewell to Arms, published in 1929:

In the late summer of that year we lived in a house in a village that looked across the river and the plain to the mountains. In the bed of the river there were pebbles and boulders, dry and white in the sun, and the water was clear and swiftly moving and blue in the channels. Troops went by the house and down the road and the dust they raised powdered the leaves of the trees. The trunks of the trees too were dusty and the leaves fell early that year and we saw the troops marching along the road and the dust rising and leaves, stirred by the breeze, falling and the soldiers marching and afterwards the road bare and white except for the leaves.

Both opening paragraphs are evocative and scene setting, and are great examples of fine writing, but Hemingway’s prose still seems modern. The late-1920s were closer in time to James’ book than we are today to Hemingway’s.

And then he was dead of a self-inflicted wound—and that was front-page news too.

Click to read full article in PDF. Source: Dallas Morning News; Date: 07-03-1961.

Be Sociable, Share!

When Men Were Men and Bugtussle Was Bugtussle: Strangely Named Places in American Newspaper Archives

Tuesday, July 5th, 2011

10 Places With Strange Names (and How They Got Them) appeared last month on the Mental_Floss blog. That post explored “the stories, legends and theories” behind ten American towns with quirky names. Here we display a reference to each of those locales from the digitized pages of newspapers published during the past century, all of which are available in American Newspaper Archives. A few of these items focus on the place names themselves; others mention these locations only in passing—in auction sales, social notes and gossip columns. Concluding this list is a colorful editorial from 50 years ago that addresses our increasing reluctance to pin peculiar names on the places we live.

1. Santa Claus, Indiana [Source: Trenton Evening Times, Dec. 22, 1930]

2. Intercourse, Pennsylvania [Source: Dallas Morning News, July 16, 1979]

3. Toad Suck, Arkansas [Source: Mobile Register, Jan. 1, 1989]

 4. Glen Campbell, Pennsylvania  [Source: Philadelphia Inquirer, Jan. 17, 1910]

 5. Eighty Eight, Kentucky  [Source: New Orleans Times-Picayune, Aug. 8, 1988]

 6. Eighty Four, Pennsylvania  [Source: Cleveland Plain Dealer, June 1, 1980]

 7. Ding Dong, Texas  [Source: Dallas Morning News, April 4, 1960]

 8. Cut and Shoot, Texas  [Source: Augusta Chronicle, Nov. 8, 1939]

 9. Idiotville, Oregon  [Source: Oregonian, April 26, 1953]

 10. Knockemstiff, Ohio   [Source: Cleveland Plain Dealer, June 22, 1971]

Finally, the following guest editorial, published in the Dallas Morning News on Feb. 26, 1962,  offers an appreciation for those proud citizens willing to hail from hamlets like Weed Heights, Nevada or Who’d-a-Thought-It, Alabama:

SIC TRANSIT BUGTUSSLE

We were disappointed, on reading that the new House majority leader, Rep. Albert, had once been an oratorical champion in Bugtussle, Okla., to learn that Bugtussle’s name has since been changed to Flowery Mound.

What a shame.  Bugtussle is a name you can get a grip on with your teeth and your imagination as well.  You can almost visualize the crawling hardships which beset the early settlers, as they tried to eat their meals or get a quiet sleep back in the days BDDT (before dichlorodiphenyl trichloroethane).  Or maybe the region had a French name and Bugtussle was the closest they could come to spelling it properly—just as Chemin Couvert became Smackover, Ark.

Does Bugtussle sound non-U?  So what.  There’s still a Bug Tussle just over the border in Texas, near Pecan Gap and not far from Telephone.  Folks aren’t ashamed to live in What Cheer, Iowa; Tombstone, Ariz.; Knockemstiff, Ohio; Punkeydoodle Corners, Ont.; Smoky Ordinary, Va.; Pigeonroost, Ky.; Weed Heights, Nev.; Mud, W. Va., or Who’d-a-Thought-It, Ala.

We take our hats off these Pigeonroosters, Smoky Ordinarians, Mudsmen and all the others who are willing, at the risk of occasional kidding, to preserve the names of the old frontier, when men were men, Bugtussle was Bugtussle and Bannack, Mont., was Grasshopper Gulch.  We wonder what has become of some of the other old names that are missing from our latest gazetteer—Lousy Level, Nev., Mugfuzzle Flat, Calif., and Flea Hop, Ala., to name a few.  Have they already been renamed Desert View, Sunset Acres and Arbor Vista?  We hope not.

American Newspaper Archives, part of America’s Historical Newspapers, presents users with searchable digital editions of regionally diverse and historically significant U.S. newspapers from more than 40 states.  Each digital edition is available individually, and many span a century or more of the American past.  For more information or to arrange a product trial, academic institutions should contact sales@readex.com, and public libraries should contact sales@newsbank.com.

Be Sociable, Share!

A Dreadful Anniversary: May 31, 1921 (Tulsa, Oklahoma)

Tuesday, May 31st, 2011

Click to open. (Topeka Plaindealer; May 28, 1915)

Tulsa’s black community was prosperous in the first decades of 20th century. There were restaurants and theaters, and a shopping district offered fine goods. The African American press of Tulsa called Oklahoma “The Promised Land.”

As the Topeka Plaindealer put it on May 28, 1915:

“There are seven good churches, and the schools are among the best in the state. Numerous rent houses are owned by the race, and they are indeed excellent ones. Many brick buildings, and business enterprises are owned by the race. There are about 4,000 colored citizens, and all in all we are pushing ahead.”

And then came the infamous and perhaps misnamed Tulsa race riot of 1921. It’s not really a riot when hundreds invade a neighborhood, loot homes, shoot people, and set the place on fire. When contemporary papers called what happened in Tulsa a race war, they weren’t exaggerating.

This is what happened on Memorial Day, 1921: A black shoeshine boy entered an elevator run by a young white woman. She screamed. He ran. Police are called and a sexual assault is presumed by others. The boy is arrested the next morning. The afternoon Topeka paper reported this and published an editorial entitled “To Lynch Negro Tonight.” A white crowd in the hundreds gathered before the county courthouse.

A group of armed blacks arrived and made an offer to help guard the prisoner. In 1919, just such a group had helped prevent a lynching. Rebuffed by the sheriff, they returned to Greenwood, a prosperous black neighborhood in Tulsa.

The white crowd around the courthouse increased. A second group of armed blacks arrived and offered to help prevent the anticipated lynching. They are turned away. This time someone tried to disarm one of them. Shots were fired, probably accidentally. The return fire was not. The blacks retreated under fire. The whites tried to break into the armory and are prevented from doing so. So they broke into sporting goods stores and grabbed weapons and ammunition.

Then the whites tried to invade the prosperous neighborhood, but were stopped by armed residents. A passenger train that drove through Greenwood was shot up by both sides. Blacks began to flee the neighborhood. The battle at the tracks died down in the early hours of June 1. Some might have thought the fighting was over.

White crowds continued to congregate on the edges of Greenwood. When the early dawn came, they attacked from several locations. A machine gun on top of a grain elevator controlled one main street. Airplanes flew overhead. Those in passenger seats fired down at the blacks below them. It is alleged that they dropped firebombs on the neighborhood. Whites would enter a home, loot it and then torch it. If the home had a gun, they would shoot the occupant out of hand.

Click to open. (Grand Rapids Press; June 1, 1921)

As the Grand Rapids Press reported on June 1, 1921:

“As dawn broke 60 or 70 motorcars filled with armed men formed a circle completely around the Negro section. Half a dozen airplanes circled overhead. There was much shouting and shooting. A row of houses along the railroad tracks was fired, but lack of wind prevented the flames spreading. A party of white riflemen was reported to be shooting at all Negroes they saw and firing into houses. The Negroes were said to be returning the fire desperately.”

Blacks fought back. A newly consecrated church offered shelter to black riflemen who fired at the mob. The machine gun was brought up and the church shot up. The nearby houses, which had been protected by the men in the church, were then looted and burned.

Rather than protect the black citizens, the Tulsa police joined in the riot against them. So did local National Guard troops. Troops from Oklahoma City arrived in early afternoon, but they did not immediately suppress the fighting, though they would by late afternoon. After the fighting died down, whites were allowed to go home. The remaining blacks were rounded up. Eventually hundreds of them were indicted. No white person was. None would be.

The original death toll was set at around 90, with a third of them white. That number was revised down to 34, with nine whites and 25 blacks. Later it was rumored that mass graves had been dug in the cemeteries. Ten square blocks of Greenwood had been burned out.

The shoeshine boy whose arrest had started these events in motion was never charged.

Click to open. (Tulsa Daily World; June 2, 1921)

Except for its scale, the Tulsa riot was similar to the race riots that swept the nation in 1919. And when it came time to assess blame, it became the fault of victims.

As the official statement of the mayor put it (published in the Tulsa World on June 14, 1921):

“First, responsibility.

“Let the blame for this negro uprising lie right where it belongs – on those armed negroes and their followers who started this trouble and who instigated it and any persons who seek to put half the blame on the white people are wrong and should be told so in no uncertain language.”

The black press had a different viewpoint:

“Whatever it [the black community] enjoyed in the matter of thrift enterprise and a fair name has been, for the moment at least, destroyed by a wanton, fiendish mob, actuated by jealousy and race hatred, which sought to wipe out the Negroes and their section of the city for the simple reason of their prosperity and intelligent development was becoming too evident to suit the wishes of a certain element of whites”

Click to open. (Negro Star; June 10, 1921)

What’s truly amazing about the riot is that national memory of it seemingly faded. It wasn’t part of the conversation during the Civil Rights Movement of the 1960s. It was lost in Orwell’s memory hole.

It’s understandable that 1920s Tulsa wouldn’t want it brought up as the young city needed outside investment. And the blacks, who rebuilt their community without help from their fellow Tulsans, might have kept quiet as the influence of the Klu Klux Klan grew during the 1920s. Not only did they get no help, but a portion of Greenwood was taken to become a train station.

In a newspaper article printed May 31, 1996, Sam Howe Verhovek wrote:

“But as the years and then decades passed, Tulsa seemed determined to forget the riot. No memorial was erected; no citywide commemoration was held; not a single person was ever charged with the deaths or the fires. In the city library, articles about the riot and the formation of white lynch mobs were simply cut out of that day’s issue of The Tulsa Tribune.”

Searching in African American Newspapers, 1827-1998, on the ten-year anniversary dates doesn’t yield any articles on the fighting in Tulsa. Searching more broadly from a few years after the riot through 1998, one finds mentions of it in articles, but often they are announcing gains made since the riot, or noting that an individual was a survivor. Only after the 1980s does the riot come up, once in reference to Mayor Wilson Good’s aerial bombing of the MOVE house in Philadelphia.

Finally, after the Murrah Federal Office Building bombing in Oklahoma City, the Oklahoma legislature established in 1997 a commission to look into the riot. Tulsa had just held its first commemoration on the 75th anniversary of the event in 1996. The commission published its report before the 80th anniversary in 2001. It can be read in PDF on the website of the Oklahoma Historical Society: http://www.okhistory.org/trrc/freport.htm. The narrative of the events of the riot found in the commission report was written by historian Scott Ellsberg and is well worth reading, providing context and detail.

To request trial access to Early American NewspapersAfrican American Newspapers, or both, please contact readexmarketing@readex.com.

Be Sociable, Share!

What’s New at Readex – Summer 2011

Monday, May 23rd, 2011

To explore our newest collections, please visit Readex at booth 3140 at the 2011 American Library Association conference. Or visit readex.com for detailed product information about these uniquely valuable resources:

African American Periodicals, 1825-1995
This complement to African American Newspapers, 1827-1998, offers “…access to little-known treasures of the Black press; for the first time researchers around the world will gain a full awareness of their content.” — Kathleen Bethel, African American Studies Librarian, Northwestern University. (Request Trial)

Ethnic American Newspapers from the Balch Collection, 1799-1971
Featuring more than 130 newspapers from 25 states—including many rare 19th-century titles—this long-awaited collection presents new opportunities for students and scholars to explore the immigrant experience of many of the most influential ethnic groups in U.S. history. (Request Trial)

Joint Publications Research Service (JPRS) Reports, 1957-1994
Featuring English translations of foreign-language monographs, reports, serials, journal and newspaper articles, and radio and television broadcasts from regions throughout the world, this digital edition contains a wealth of hard-to-find scientific, technical, and social science materials. (Request Trial)

America’s Historical Newspapers: Select
Previously available only by series, every title in  America’s Historical Newspapers can now be acquired by place of publication, including all 50 U.S. states and more than 450 cities. To customize a collection that best meets the needs of researchers at your institution, please use this easy form.

World Newspaper Archive
“I am astonished at the quantity of available material in the Readex digital collections. African Newspapers has been critical to my research.” — Raquel Gomes, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Brazil. Also available: East European, Latin American, and South Asian Newspapers. (Request Trial)

Win a getaway to Florida or Vermont!
Don’t forget about the annual Silent Auction to raise funds for the W. David Rozkuszka Scholarship. Sponsored by Readex and GODORT, this important fundraiser has assisted twelve students with their library education since 1995. Up for bid are vacation stays in scenic Chester, Vermont and sunny Naples, Florida. Bid online today!

We hope to see you in New Orleans at NewsBank booth 3140.

Be Sociable, Share!

Robert Smalls: Contraband Captain and U.S. Congressman

Monday, May 9th, 2011

Robert Smalls (April 5, 1839–February 23, 1915)

Born into slavery in Beaufort, South Carolina on April 5, 1839, Robert Smalls was eventually taken to Charleston and hired out by his master to various shipping concerns. Smalls developed into one of Charleston’s most skilled seamen and was later impressed into the service of the Confederate Navy. Smalls became the wheelsman of the Confederate steamship Planter whose crew consisted of seven other slaves and three white officers. During the Civil War, when Charleston was surrounded by a flotilla of Union ships attempting to blockade the city, Smalls and his fellow enslaved crewmen concocted a plan to take the Planter to the Union lines and escape to freedom.

In the early morning of May 13, 1862, the Planter was anchored in Charleston Harbor. After the white officers left the ship for the evening, Smalls and the black crewmen cast off from the docks. They stopped at another dock to pick up their families, including Smalls’ wife and two young children. Smalls’ plan was to impersonate the Planter’s captain, who was the same height and build. By donning the captain’s coat and straw hat, he hoped to avoid being spotted by the sentries patrolling Charleston Harbor.

The Planter at Georgetown, South Carolina

As the Planter passed the fortresses that protected the Harbor, including Fort Sumter, Smalls gave the proper whistle signals that served as passwords. The ship was allowed to pass unmolested. Once on open water, the Planter’s crew lowered the Confederate flag and raised a large white sheet to signal their surrender. As their ship approached the Union blockade, it was nearly fired upon by the U.S.S. Onward, whose crew thought it was part of a Confederate attack. Seeing the white sheet, the captain of the Onward accepted the surrendered ship and the Planter was taken to the North and freedom.

Click to read full article in PDF. Source: Boston Daily Advertiser; Date: 05-20-1862; Boston, Massachusetts

Smalls’ exploits on the Planter made him famous in the North. For capturing an enemy ship and cannons, Smalls and the crew of the Planter received half of the ship’s value as prize money. Smalls became an advocate for African-American rights, and he helped to convince Abraham Lincoln to allow blacks to serve in the armed forces. Smalls himself worked aboard several Navy ships during the Civil War, including the Keokuk. In 1863, Smalls took command of the Planter when it came under heavy enemy fire. Smalls was named captain of the Planter, a position he held until the end of the war.

Click to read full article in PDF. Source: Albany Journal; Date: 12-15-1863; Albany, New York

After the war, Smalls became involved in South Carolina politics. A devoted member of the Republican Party, Smalls worked diligently to encourage other blacks to support the party. Smalls was elected first to the State House and then to the State Senate. In 1874, Smalls was elected to the U.S. Congress where he served several terms. As Reconstruction ended and blacks were denied their civil rights, Robert Smalls remained an advocate for his people. In 1895, he was one of six black members elected to the convention to rewrite the South Carolina constitution. Smalls argued eloquently for the equality of black citizens, but to no avail. The South Carolina constitution stripped African-Americans of voting rights and other civil liberties. Appointed Collector of Customs for his hometown of Beaufort, Smalls served faithfully in the position for many years. Robert Smalls died on February 23, 1915.

Click to read full article in PDF. Source: Cleveland Gazette; Date: 03-28-1885; Cleveland, Ohio

To request trial access to either Early American NewspapersAfrican American Newspapers, or both, please contact readexmarketing@readex.com.

Be Sociable, Share!