Posts Tagged ‘Early American Newspapers’

The Top-Ten Readex Blog Posts of 2011

Monday, December 19th, 2011

Of the 75 or so posts published here this year, these were the ten most-read: 

February 27, 1923. Miss Alice Reighly, Anti-Flirt Club president, Wash., D.C.

1. Preserving the Library in the Digital Age

2. In Praise of Librarians and Archivists

3. Researching Nat Turner’s Slave Revolt in American (and African American) Newspapers

4. 100 Years Ago: A Look Back at 1911

5. Anti-Flirtation: There Ought to Be a Law

6. The Bomarc Missile Plutonium Spill Crisis: Exercises in Propaganda and Containment in 1960 and Beyond

7. “Information Wanted” Advertisements: Searching for African American Family Members

8. Law & Disorder: Urbana University Students Bring an 1857 Court Case to Life

9. Civil War Imagery on Clipper Ship Sailing Cards

10. Remembering the Triangle Shirtwaist Company Fire on its 100th Anniversary

Thank you for reading the Readex Blog. We want to hear from our readers. To leave comments, or to propose a topic for a future blog post, please use the space below or write to dloiterstein@readex.com.  To subscribe to the Readex Blog, please use our RSS feed. We’ll see you back here in 2012. Happy New Year!

Be Sociable, Share!

The Readex Report: In Praise of Librarians and Archivists; Of Presidents and Papers; Ephemeral Loyalties; and Playing Hardball

Tuesday, November 15th, 2011

In our latest issue: A professor lauds his colleagues in the library; dissecting a timeless inaugural speech; consumption versus nationalism in early America; and the unheralded impact of a hard-swinging civil rights giant.

In Praise of Librarians and Archivists: Appreciating the Colleagues Who Make Professors’ Jobs Easier

By Mark Cheathem, Associate Professor of History, Cumberland University

Since I was a child begging my mother to take me to the library on a daily basis, I have appreciated the designated keepers of books. Conducting research as an undergraduate student made me aware of the specialized jobs that academic librarians did every day to make life easier for the clueless young people like me who wandered into the building with no idea about how to find academic journal articles or primary sources…. (read article)

Of Presidents and Papers

By Martha King, Associate Editor, The Papers of Thomas Jefferson

The Papers of Thomas Jefferson, established at Princeton University, is preparing the authoritative and comprehensive edition of the correspondence and papers of our nation’s third president. As historians editing Jefferson’s incoming and outgoing correspondence, we are responsible for gathering documents and making them available to posterity in an accurate, transcribed, and contextualized format through our published and digital editions…. (read article)

Ephemeral Loyalties? Consumption, Commerce and Jeffersonian Politics, 1806-1815

By Joanna Cohen, School of History at Queen Mary, University of London

While the Revolution may have secured Americans their political independence, economic independence remained elusive. As early as 1783, Americans realized that they had not extricated themselves in any meaningful way from the mercantile system of the Atlantic world, still dominated by European imperial might…. (read article)

Playing Hardball: Brushing Off the Memory of a Civil Rights Giant

By Harvey M. Kahn, Humanities Reporter

Many scholars consider Rube Foster’s impact on the civil rights movement as important as that of Booker T. Washington, W.E.B. Du Bois, or any other early twentieth-century figure. Today, with the exception of diehard baseball fans, few people recognize his name…. (read article)

Subscribe today to receive the next quarterly issue of The Readex Report in your inbox. Browse previous issues in our archive. If you would like to comment, contribute or suggest an article, please email The Readex Report editor: readexreport@readex.com.

Be Sociable, Share!

Tecumseh’s Dream Shattered: 200th Anniversary of the Battle of Tippecanoe

Monday, November 7th, 2011

When reading accounts of the tragic conflict between whites and Native Americans, such as Dee Brown’s Bury My Heart at Wounded Knee, one cannot help but wonder why the Indians did not see the whites as a common enemy and band together for their common safety and survival. Unfortunately for them, ancient tribal enmities seemed to erect insurmountable barriers.

So it was that in one of the earliest “Indian wars,” the Mohegan and Pequot tribes helped the English colonists defeat the Narragansett and Wampanoag tribes in 1675-76. Arikara and Crow scouts helped Lt. Col. George Armstrong Custer find Sitting Bull’s Arapaho, Cheyenne and Lakota village at the Little Bighorn in 1876. Chiricahua scouts helped General George Crook wage war against the Apache in 1882.  

Shawnee Chief Tecumseh

However, in this sorrowful history of the decimation of one tribe after another by the advance of white civilization, a heroic figure stands apart. One Native American leader tried to do the seemingly impossible: Tecumseh, the charismatic and influential Shawnee chief who organized a tribal confederacy to oppose the white encroachment on Indian lands. A fierce warrior, powerful orator and cunning diplomat, Tecumseh spent the first decade of the nineteenth century skillfully building his dream confederacy.

Then it all fell apart in two hours. In the cold drizzle, overcast skies and pitch darkness of a pre-dawn battle, Tecumseh’s dream was shattered and his confederacy decimated at the Battle of Tippecanoe in Indiana Territory on Nov. 7, 1811—a clash Tecumseh had warned his people to avoid, and a battle that happened without him.  

Tenskwatawa, The Prophet

The Battle of Tippecanoe was one of the most significant battles in the 400-year history of the “Indian Wars” in America, and one of the most important in U.S. history. That single fight destroyed the Native American confederation, was one of the chief sparks of the War of 1812, and helped propel the soldiers’ leader into the White House. 

This story centers around three individuals: Tecumseh, the great Shawnee chief; his brother Tenskwatawa, a crazed medicine man who called himself “The Prophet”; and William Henry Harrison, then-governor of Indiana Territory—an aspiring politician who eventually became the  ninth president of the United States.  

William Henry Harrison

While Tecumseh was travelling throughout the “Northwest Territory”—primarily the modern-day states of Indiana and Illinois—organizing his confederation, Harrison was scheming to expand Indiana Territory’s population to qualify for statehood. To do that, he needed more land—Indian land. He followed the usual procedure—flattery and gifts—to convince some chiefs to put their marks on a piece of paper, the so-called Treaty of Fort Wayne, on Sept. 30, 1809—thereby gaining nearly 3,000,000 acres of land right in the heart of the Indian’s prime hunting grounds.

Tecumseh was furious, and angrily denounced Harrison and his sham treaty in a face-to-face encounter in 1810. The two antagonists met again in August 1811 in Vincennes, the capital of Indiana Territory. Tecumseh was calmer this time, but just as adamant that Harrison’s treaty had no validity and would be ignored by his confederation. This time it was Harrison’s turn to be angry; at the end of the meeting he warned Tecumseh that he had purchased the land legally and would defend the whites’ right to it.

The following newspaper article reports on Tecumseh’s message to Harrison. At the same time it accuses Tecumseh of duplicity, this article points a stern finger of blame squarely at the British for instigating the Indians’ opposition. This article was printed by the Reporter (Lexington, Kentucky) on Nov. 23, 1811: 

…Stript of the thin disguise with which he [Tecumseh] attempted to cover his intentions, the plain English of what he said appeared to be this—“In obedience to the orders of my masters, the British, I have now succeeded in uniting the northern tribes of Indians in a confederacy for the purpose of attacking the United States, and I am now on my way to stir up the southern Indians; I wish you however to remain perfectly quiet until I return—do not attempt to obtain any satisfaction for the injuries you may sustain, or for such as you have already received; I am not yet quite ready to resist you—when I return, I shall be completely so, and then you may do as you please.

The wheels were now set in motion for the Battle of Tippecanoe. Before leaving for the conference with Harrison, Tecumseh announced to his people that he was embarking on a five-month tour of the South to encourage other tribes to join the confederation, including the powerful Cherokees, Chickasaws, Choctaws, Creeks and Seminoles. He sternly admonished his brother, The Prophet, to keep peace and order in their large village and avoid—at all costs—any confrontation with the whites, even if it meant temporarily abandoning their village. Tecumseh told his brother the confederation was not yet powerful enough to wage war against the whites, and must bide its time until after he returned with Southern allies. He also told Harrison about his Southern mission, to let the aggressive governor know the powerful Indian confederation was getting even stronger.

Harrison realized that with Tecumseh away, the time was ripe to take a firm stand against the confederation that stood between him and his dreams of statehood. He assembled a force of over 1,000 men, consisting of U.S. Army regulars, mounted riflemen and militia. Their destination: the large confederation village at the confluence of the Tippecanoe and Wabash Rivers, called “the Prophet’s Town” by the whites but really Tecumseh’s village. While his brother awed the villagers with his mysterious ways, incantations and seemingly magical powers, Tecumseh was the war leader the people trusted to guide them.

The following series of historical newspaper articles tells the story. Harrison’s expedition was in the “wilderness,” away from white civilization, and it took a while for the news to reach the newspapers, usually in the form of letters from participating officers and Harrison himself. However, it is surprising to read the accurate and detailed accounts the newspapers were able to supply the public—and how common the knowledge was that the guns, ammunition and supplies for Tecumseh’s confederation came from the British.

In September 1811 Harrison’s army began their advance. On Sept. 27, one of the officers wrote the following letter, printed by the Columbian Phenix, aka Providence Patriot (Providence, Rhode Island) on Nov. 2, 1811: 

Indian Affairs 

We have been favored, by a gentleman of this town, with the following extracts of letters from an officer in the Western army. In the present uncertainty of the public mind, respecting the ultimate views of the red borderers on our territory (or rather of the British government) and its solicitude with regard to the situation of the small but gallant American force, apparently about to engage in “the unprofitable contest of trying which can do the other the most harm”—these extracts will be perused with interest. 

Camp, 30 miles above Vincennes,

Indiana Territory, Sept, 27, 1811.

Since my last, the troops have descended the Ohio River 1026 miles; ascended the Wabash 150; and are now on our march to the Prophet’s town, for the purpose of erecting a fort on lands purchased of the Indians; but which they now decline giving up. Without doubt, they have been instigated to do this by English emissaries, as well as to massacre some of the whites in their vicinity—and to seize a boat with articles belonging to the government. We have been informed, that they are collected together to the amount of 7 or 800, with intent to resist any settlement, or the erection of a fort. It is expected that Governor Harrison, who is our commander in chief, will, if the Indians resist, force his way to the point he wishes, and erect the fort…We are all in good spirits, and I trust shall do our duty.

This article warns that the approaching confrontation would not be easy, and blames the British for stirring up the Indians. It was printed by The Reporter (Washington, Pennsylvania) on Nov. 4, 1811: 

…It was believed, that on the appearance of an armed force on the Wabash, the idle menaces of the savages, and the ridiculous views of their infatuated leader under the influence and council of our good friends the British, would be awed into silence or totally abandoned. But the true situation of the business now seems different—a force equal to governor Harrison’s has been collected—& the same warlike spirit prevails among the Indians as formerly.

This theme of blaming the British underlay much of the reporting about Harrison’s expedition. Here is another example, printed by the Palladium of Liberty (Morristown, New Jersey) on Nov. 5, 1811: 

…From the friendly course pursued by Mr. Jefferson towards our neighbors, and which has been followed by Mr. Madison, we had supposed the Indians would never more treat us otherwise than as brethren. But we have been mistaken—British intrigue and British gold, it seems, have had greater influence with them of late than American justice and benevolence. Be it so; but let England not hide herself any longer behind the curtain—let her appear to the world as she is, the instigator and protector of savage cruelties; and then real Americans will call into action that spirit of necessary resistance which so eminently distinguished their fathers in the wars of the Revolution.

We have in our possession information which proves beyond doubt the late disturbances to be owing to the successful intrigues of British emissaries with the Indians.

Harrison’s men stopped on October 3 to build a fort, which was named Fort Harrison, and awaited supplies which finally arrived late in the month. With the fort completed and his men restocked, Harrison moved out on October 28 to meet the Indian confederation at its village stronghold—to enforce compliance with the treaty, or do battle.

Just before the supplies arrived, Harrison sat down and wrote Governor Scott of Kentucky the following letter, which the governor passed on to the newspapers. This article was printed by the Reporter (Lexington, Kentucky) on Nov. 9, 1811: 

…The fort which I have erected here, is now complete (as to its defence). I wait for provisions, which I expect tomorrow or the next day, when I shall immediately commence my march, without waiting for the troops which are in the rear—I am determined to disperse the Prophet’s banditti before I return, or give him the chance of acquiring as much fame as a Warrior, as he now has as a Saint. His own proper force does not at this time, exceed 450, but in his rear there are many villages of Potawatomies, most of whom wish well to his cause. I believe they will not join him, but should they do it, and give us battle, I have no fear of the issue. My small army, when joined by the mounted riflemen in the rear, will be formidable—it will not then exceed 950 effectives, but I have great confidence in them, and the relative proportion of the several species of troops, is such as I could wish it.

As the Americans drew near the confederation village on November 6, Tenskwatawa sent three messengers to request a peace conference the next day. Harrison warily agreed, but had his men camp that night in a defensive position about a half-mile from the village, prepared for the battle he suspected was coming—and he had reason to be suspicious. Despite Tecumseh’s explicit warning to avoid a battle in his absence, The Prophet told the warriors he saw in a vision a complete victory for the outnumbered and outgunned Indians (many of the confederation Indians had left Tippecanoe to visit their home villages during Tecumseh’s absence, and only around 500 warriors remained in the confederation village). The Prophet also claimed his magic would make the whites’ bullets harmless.

The Indians attacked shortly after 4:00 the morning of Nov. 7, 1811. The sleeping Americans were at first overwhelmed, but quickly rallied and fought back. The combat was fierce, most of it hand-to-hand, and the Indians quickly realized The Prophet’s vision and magic were both false. When dawn broke two hours later the battle ended, the warriors fleeing back into the woods. The Americans suffered 188 casualties, including 62 dead, but they had held their ground. Although only 38 Indians were killed and perhaps 70 wounded, they had clearly lost the battle and their spirit was broken. The confederation village was hastily abandoned except for one elderly, sick woman who could not run away. The next day Harrison’s men burned it to the ground, destroying the Indians’ shelter, clothing and equipment and capturing their winter food supply of 5,000 bushels of corn and beans.

This is how Harrison reported the fight to Secretary of War William Eustis the day after the Battle of Tippecanoe. His letter was printed by the Alexandria Daily Gazette, Commercial & Political (Alexandria, Virginia) on Dec. 2, 1811:

…I arrived at my present position (a mile from the town) on the evening of the 6th instant; a correspondence was immediately opened with the Prophet, and there was every appearance of a successful termination of the expedition, without bloodshed. Indeed there was an agreement for a suspension of hostilities, until a further communication should take place on the next day. Contrary, however, to this engagement, he attacked me at half past four o’clock in the morning, so suddenly, that the Indians were in the camp before many of the men could get out of their tents. A little confusion for a short time prevailed, but aided by the great exertions of the officers, I was soon enabled to form the men in order. The companies which were hard pressed were supported, several successful charges made, and about daylight, the enemy were finally put to flight. Our killed and wounded amount to 179, of these 42 are now dead.

The same day as Harrison’s letter, one of his officers—Captain Hunter—wrote the following letter. It was printed by the Ohio Gazette and Virginia Herald (Marietta, Ohio) on Nov. 25, 1811: 

wounded is very great. Geiger and myself (Capt. Hunter) are slightly wounded. The most of our men from Kentucky are safe or not badly wounded. The rascals have got all our beef, & some of our horses. Such a battle has never been fought. We have killed many of their Warriors—the most that we have found are old men; they were all through our camp. An old woman was left in the town, who says, that we killed many of them, and wounded many more. We are all in high spirits.”

Further details are supplied by this letter, printed by the Alexandria Daily Gazette, Commercial & Political (Alexandria, Virginia) on Nov. 27, 1811: 

…The Indians made the attack on the [morning] of the 7th inst.—they surprised our army—they killed all the guards with arrows and were in the camp before the whites had the least notice of them. The battle was fought in sight of the Prophet’s Town. Three Indians attacked Col. F. Geiger in his tent at one time—he killed one and vanquished the other two—he was shot through the arm. Gov. Harrison was shot through the hat and slightly wounded in the head. Thomas Randolph was killed dead; Judge Taylor’s horse was killed under him. It is said that Major Floyd fought like Caesar in his shirt-tail. The Indians rushed up and came to the point of the bayonet with their tomahawks. There has been dreadful slaughter…Hunter states that the Indians got all their beef and a great number of their horses; they [the soldiers] got about five thousand bushels of corn and burned the Prophet’s Town the day after the action.”

The confederation was greatly demoralized by its defeat and the loss of its stronghold, and angrily blamed The Prophet for falsely promising the warriors that his magic would protect them. They tied him up and held him captive, awaiting his brother’s sure-to-be-angry return. This article was printed by the Farmer’s Repository (Charlestown, West Virginia) on Dec. 27, 1811: 

by his conjuration, turn their powder into sand—and furnished every warrior with a charm to render him invulnerable…A report prevailed at Vincennes, that Tecumseh with 300 warriors, from the southern tribes, was on his march to the Wabash—this was believed, but little fear existed of depredations from them; it was supposed they would disperse when made acquainted with the fate of their allies.

Governor Harrison had achieved his signal triumph. With evident satisfaction, he wrote the following letter to Secretary Eustis on December 4. It was printed by the Federal Gazette & Baltimore Daily Advertiser (Baltimore, Maryland) on Dec. 23, 1811:

…It is certain that our frontiers have never enjoyed more profound tranquility than at this time. No injury of any kind that I can hear of has been done either to the persons or property of our citizens. Before the [Tippecanoe] expedition not a fortnight passed over without some vexatious depredation being committed. The Kickapoo chiefs…acknowledge, however, that the Indians have never sustained so severe a defeat since their acquaintance with the white people.

Tecumseh returned two months after the Battle of Tippecanoe to find his village in ashes and his confederation torn apart, the Indians scattered. It had taken Tecumseh ten years to build his dream. His foolish brother destroyed it in two hours.

With great restraint he did not kill his brother, but instead publicly denounced him and doomed him to a life of scorn—the disgraced Tenskwatawa lived another abject 23 years, dying at the age of 61.

Despite his efforts, Tecumseh could not rebuild the former strength and unity of his confederation; the Indians’ will and faith had been broken. When the War of 1812 broke out seven months after the Battle of Tippecanoe—in part caused by American anger over British complicity in the Indian hostilities—Tecumseh and what warriors still followed him joined the British and played a major role in the capture of Detroit on Aug. 16, 1812. However, he was betrayed at the Battle of the Thames on Oct. 5, 1813, when the cowardly British commander fled the field and Tecumseh was killed rallying his warriors. He was 45.

Harrison was the victorious American commander at the Battle of the Thames. When he successfully ran for president in the election of 1840 with running mate John Tyler, the popular campaign slogan and song “Tippecanoe and Tyler too” was used to rekindle voters’ enthusiasm for Harrison’s landmark victory over Tecumseh’s Indian confederation. He became the nation’s ninth president on March 4, 1841, at the age of 68. He died exactly one month later.

Be Sociable, Share!

Archive of Americana transports you through time into 18th- and 19th-century America

Friday, October 28th, 2011

As a Readex account executive, I enjoy the opportunity to help bring our digital collections to the attention of students and scholars at some of the smallest four-year colleges. Occasionally, this extends to working collaboratively with librarians and faculty.

Among my accounts is Washington College on Maryland’s Eastern Shore. At this liberal arts institution known for its strong commitment to undergraduate education, I consulted closely with Ruth Shoge, Associate Professor, College Librarian, and Adam Goodheart, Director of the College’s C.V. Starr Center for the Study of the American Experience, among others, to help bring the acclaimed Archive of Americana collections to their campus.

The Archive of Americana was used extensively by Adam Goodheart in writing his highly praised new book, 1861: The Civil War Awakening (Knopf, 2011). Reviewing 1861 recently, the Boston Globe wrote, “Goodheart shows us that even at 150 years’ distance there are new voices, and new stories, to be heard about the Civil War.” The New York Times review said, “1861 creates the uncanny illusion that the reader has stepped into a time machine,” and Pulitzer Prize winner James M. McPherson describes its author as “a Monet with a pen instead of a paintbrush.”

Last month Adam sent me these comments about our Archive of Americana, and encouraged me to share them further:

“Readex’s databases transport you through time into 18th- and 19th-century America. The eloquent, cantankerous voices of the young nation come through loud and clear in literally millions of speeches, sermons, editorials and newspaper ads. The most remarkable thing is that just a few years ago, reading many of these publications would have required traveling hundreds of miles to rare-book libraries or waiting weeks for microfilm reels to arrive. Now you can summon them up instantly without getting up from your chair. My own book would not have been the same without Readex.

“Best regards to you—and thanks to all those at Readex who work hard to create these tremendous resources.”

I was pleased to also learn that our databases are now helping Adam research his second book.

Does your institution have research needs that Readex digital collections might help fill? Please let me know. My e-mail address is gmauerhoff@readex.com

 

Be Sociable, Share!

Early American Newspapers, Series 1: Key Titles and Their Nameplates

Monday, October 17th, 2011

Artist: Joseph H. Davis (1811-1865). Title: Mr. and Mrs. Daniel Otis and Child (1834). Source: Metropolitan Museum of Art.

Focusing on the 18th and early 19th centuries, the first series of Early American Newspapers offers over 350,000 issues from more than 710 titles. This widely used digital collection, based primarily on Clarence S. Brigham’s authoritative “History and Bibliography of American Newspapers, 1690-1820,” contains newspapers from 23 states and the District of Columbia.

Below is a brief description—and the nameplate—of several key titles:

Albany Register (New York)
One of the most successful and influential American newspapers of the late 18th and early 19th century, the Register was edited from 1808 to 1822 by the ardent anti-Federalist Solomon Southwick.

• Includes 485 issues published between 1794 and 1813. Early American Newspapers, Series 2 includes 1,462 issues published between 1789 and 1822.

American Beacon (Norfolk, Virginia)
Published by a ship captain in the busy 19th-century seaport of Norfolk, the Beacon focused on seafaring activities.

• Includes 1,670 issues published between 1815 and 1820

American Mercury (Hartford, Connecticut)
With a reputation for outspokenness, the Mercury was for many years Connecticut’s leading reform paper as well as a key proponent of ensuring legal equality for religious sects.

• Includes 2,586 issues published between 1784 and 1829. Coverage between 1830 and 1833 will be found in Early American Newspapers, Series 6

American Minerva (New York)
Self-described as “Patroness of Peace, Commerce, and the Liberal Arts,” Noah Webster’s federalist newspaper was established to support the policies of President George Washington.

• Includes 744 issues published between 1793 and 1796

American Weekly Mercury (Philadelphia, Pennsylvania)
Founded in 1719 and the first newspaper in the Colonies to be published outside Boston, the Mercury was well known for its essays on political liberty.

 

• Includes 1,370 issues published between 1719 and 1746

Arkansas Gazette (Little Rock)
One of the first newspapers west of the Mississippi, the Gazette was founded 16 years before Arkansas achieved statehood. Throughout the 19th and 20th centuries, it remained one of the most influential newspapers in the region.

 

• Includes 337 issues published between 1819 and 1826. Early American Newspapers, Series 6 includes 8,638 issues of the Arkansas Gazette published between 1820 and 1900.

Boston News-Letter (Massachusetts)
Established in 1704, the News-Letter was the first regularly published newspaper in the British Colonies of North America. Noted for its pro-British sympathies, the News-Letter went through a succession of printers, including Margaret Draper, one the few women printers of the 18th century.

• Includes 3,500 issues published between 1704 and 1776

City Gazette (Charleston, South Carolina)
The City Gazette provides extensive coverage of the culture and history of Antebellum South Carolina, including the invention of the cotton gin and the rise of slavery.

• Includes 10,306 issues published between 1787 and 1821. Early American Newspapers, Series 2 includes 3,011 issues published between 1712 and 1826, and Series 4 includes 1,864 issues published between 1827 and 1833.

Daily National Intelligencer (Washington, D.C.)
As the official publication for Congressional reports, the Intelligencer’s government news was shipped to editors across the country.

• Includes 2,127 issues published between 1813 and 1820. Early American Newspapers, Series 6 includes 16,763 issues published between 1821 and 1869.

Eastern Argus (Portland, Maine)
This long-running weekly argued for Maine’s independence from Massachusetts.

• Includes 2,582 issues published between 1803 and 1833. Early American Newspapers, Series 3 includes 488 issues published between 1833 and 1880, and Series 7 will include issues published between 1835 and 1876.

Enquirer (Richmond, Virginia)
This influential southern newspaper was edited and published for 41 years by leading American journalist Thomas Ritchie. Of the Enquirer, Thomas Jefferson wrote:” I read but a single newspaper, Ritchie’s Enquirer, the best that is published or ever has been published in America.” Later issues of the Enquirer offer perspectives on the Confederacy’s reaction to Reconstruction.

• Includes 1,905 issues published between 1804 and 1820. Early American Newspapers, Series 2 includes 258 issues published between 1838 and 1865, and Series 6 will include issues published between 1866 and 1876.

Evening Post (New York City)
First published by Alexander Hamilton in 1801 as a broadside, the Post remains today the oldest continuously published daily in the country. It gained national fame under the editorship of poet and abolitionist William Cullen Bryant.

• Includes 6,090 issues published between 1801 and 1821. Early American Newspapers, Series 7 will include issues published between 1822 and 1876.

Farmer’s Cabinet (Amherst, New Hampshire)
The Cabinet is especially noteworthy for remaining neutral when many newspapers of its time were openly influenced by political controversy.

• Includes 4,943 issues published between 1802 and 1879

Georgia Gazette (Savannah)
Georgia’s first newspaper, the Gazette provides a rich record of southern colonial life.

• Includes 363 issues published between 1763 and 1770. Early American Newspapers, Series 2 includes 600 issues published between 1788 and 1802. Early American Newspapers, Series 5, includes 19 issues published in 1803.

Massachusetts Spy (Boston and Worcester)
Initially neutral but soon openly supporting the Patriots, the Massachusetts Spy was arguably the most important newspaper in America leading up to the Revolution. It was co-founded by Isaiah Thomas, one of the most successful and colorful journalists of the 18th century and founder of the American Antiquarian Society.

• Includes 283 issues published in Boston between 1770 and 1775, and 2,371 issues published in Worcester between 1775 and 1820. Early American Newspapers, Series 6 will include issues published between 1821 and 1876.

National Aegis (Worcester, Massachusetts)
Offering a political counterpoint to Worcester’s Federalist paper, the Massachusetts Spy, the Aegis defended Jeffersonian Republicanism throughout its run.

• Includes 989 issues published between 1801 and 1820. Early American Newspapers, Series 2 includes 155 issues published between 1825 and 1827, and Series 7 will include issues published between 1821 and 1876.

New-England Courant (Boston)
Shortly after founding the Courant in 1721, James Franklin was imprisoned and his paper suppressed for its radical views against the General Court. Franklin’s younger brother, Benjamin, who had been serving his apprenticeship at the Courant, assumed control of the paper in 1723. Benjamin Franklin’s early writings, under the name Silence Dogood, appear in this paper.

• Includes 243 issues published between 1721 and 1726

New-Hampshire Gazette (Portsmouth)
The first newspaper in the state of New Hampshire, the Gazette is also one the nation’s oldest existing papers.

• Includes 4,140 issues published between 1756 and 1833. Early American Newspapers, Series 2 includes 415 issues published between 1836 and 1844, Series 3 includes 486 issues published between 1834 and 1851, Series 4 includes 772 issues published between 1836 and 1851, and Series 7 will include issues published between 1852 and 1876.

Pennsylvania Gazette (Philadelphia)
Published by Benjamin Franklin, this prominent 18th-century newspaper contains not only in-depth articles on every aspect of Colonial America but also the full text of many seminal government documents, including the U.S. Constitution, the Declaration of Independence and the Federalist Papers.

• Includes 635 issues published between 1742 and 1757. Early American Newspapers, Series 2 includes 1,524 issues published between 1736 and 1775

Providence Patriot (Rhode Island)
The Patriot, an influential and often eloquent paper, provides a local look at two early race riots: the 1824 Hardscrabble Riot and the 1831 Snow Town Riot in which working class whites attacked African American residents. Unable to control the violent mob, Providence officials requested that the Governor send in military troops.

• Includes 1,507 issues published between 1814 and 1829. Early American Newspapers, Series 2 includes 1,192 issues published between 1814 and 1834.

Publick Occurrences (Boston)
The first newspaper in North America, Publick Occurrences: Both Forreign and Domestick was published for the first and last time on September 26, 1690 before being shut down for printing “sundry doubtful and uncertain Reports” without royal consent.

• Includes the single issue published in 1690

Vermont Gazette (Bennington)
Publisher Anthony Haswell, who brought the first printing press to Vermont, was jailed for publishing articles in the Gazette that criticized the United States’ newly established government.

• Includes 2,199 issues published between 1783 and 1832. Early American Newspapers, Series 3 includes 105 issues published between 1843 and 1844, and Series 5 includes 834 issues published between 1832 and 1850.

For more information about Early American Newspapers, Series 1, 1690-1876, please contact readexmarketing@readex.com or visit our website.  To request a free trial for your institution, please use this form.

Be Sociable, Share!

Have you attended a Readex ETC training session yet?

Tuesday, August 30th, 2011

ETC (Enhancements, Training and Content) is an ongoing, multifaceted program that provides Readex customers with web-based historical content unavailable elsewhere, the latest and most useful product features and functionality, and online access and storage support. In addition, as part of the ETC program we feature regularly scheduled training sessions that are highly valued by many of our customers.

Led by experienced product experts, these online sessions provide guidance and suggestions for making the most of your Readex collections. Faculty and students are welcome to attend, and ample time is provided for questions.

Following is our 2011 Training Schedule. Register for one or more of the sessions today!

America’s Historical Imprints

Including Early American Imprints, Series I and II: Evans and Shaw-Shoemaker, 1639-1819; Supplements from the Library Company of Philadelphia; and American Broadsides and Ephemera, 1760-1900. Sign up for training, or learn more about this collection.

America’s Historical Newspapers and World Newspaper Archive

Including Early American Newspapers, American Ethnic Newspapers, 20th-Century American Newspapers, American Newspaper Archives and World Newspaper Archive. Sign up for training, or learn more about America’s Historical Newspapers or World Newspaper Archive.

America’s Historical Periodicals

Including African American Periodicals—the largest database of its kind and the inaugural collection in America’s Historical Periodicals. Sign up for training, or learn more about this collection.

America’s Historical Government Publications

Largely untapped by traditional research, these collections—U.S. Congressional Serial Set, American State Papers, House and Senate Journals and Senate Executive Journals—enable students and scholars to study, as never before, events as they unfolded and decisions as they were made. Sign up for training, or learn more about this collection.

Foreign Broadcast Information Service (FBIS), 1941-1996

The FBIS Daily Report has been the United States’ principal historical record of political open source intelligence for nearly 70 years. This one-of-a-kind archive of foreign broadcasts and news provides fascinating insight into the second half of the 20th century. Sign up for training, or learn more about this collection.

The Civil War: Antebellum Period to Reconstruction

This thematic subset of the Archive of Americana features primary materials from America’s Historical Newspapers, American Broadsides and Ephemera, and the U.S. Congressional Serial Set. Sign up for training, or learn more about this collection.

Other Training Options

In addition to the scheduled sessions above, Readex offers institutions participating in the ETC program the opportunity to request customized Webinars for its staff, faculty and students, as well as on-site training from a Readex expert. Contact bkolcun@readex.com for more information.

Be Sociable, Share!

ETC (Enhancements, Training and Content): Overview and 2011 Update 2

Thursday, August 25th, 2011

ETC (Enhancements, Training and Content) is an ongoing, multifaceted program that provides Readex customers with one-of-a-kind historical content unavailable online elsewhere. In addition, the ETC program ensures that your library receives the latest and most useful features and functionality, and its training component provides guidance and suggestions for making the most of your Readex collections. ETC also covers online access and storage support.

From the Marietta Journal (September 11, 1890)

Just as Readex is committed to providing its customers with the highest level of ongoing support and maintenance, it is also committed to ensuring that its definitive and comprehensive digital collections continue to grow through the addition of highly relevant new content and features. The ETC program enables you to be certain that you are providing your users and patrons with the most complete and robust digital edition of every Readex collection available at your institution. Through ETC, new content that brings significant enrichment and up-to-date interface functionalities and features will be added periodically. In this manner, ETC will continuously enrich your Readex collections by providing added value and content for your users and patrons for years to come.

The ETC releases for April through August 2011 are complete and include:

  • U.S. Congressional Serial Set: House and Senate Journals from 1969, 91st Congress, 1st session; House and Senate Journals from 1970, 91st Congress, 2nd session.
  • FBIS Reports: Central Eurasia, 1993 (April, May, June): 52 issues, 6,005 pages, 12,064 articles; Central Eurasia, 1993 (July, August): 29 issues, 2,886 pages, 5,596 articles

Releases will continue throughout 2011 on a monthly basis, including additional content for Early American Newspapers, U.S. Congressional Serial Set, and Foreign Broadcast Information Service (FBIS) Daily Reports, 1974-1996.

A new fall schedule of Webinar-based training sessions for all Readex digital collections is available to ETC participants. See our sign-up page to register for a convenient session.

Questions or comments? Please feel free to post them here or email me directly at bkolcun@readex.com.

Be Sociable, Share!

Men of War: David Farragut, Franklin Buchanan, and the Battle of Mobile Bay

Friday, August 12th, 2011

Source: http://www.davidrumsey.com

The city of Mobile, Alabama, was a major center of trade on the Gulf Coast during the Civil War. Although the Union blockading fleet patrolled Mobile, blockade runners managed to elude capture and keep the city supplied with goods. Union forces hoped to cut Mobile off from the ocean, but taking Mobile Bay was a daunting task. Three fortresses—Fort Morgan, Fort Gaines and Fort Powell—guarded the entrance of the bay. Shoals and shallow water forced invading ships to follow a route directly in the line of fire of the forts. Mobile Bay was also protected by underwater mines, known at the time as torpedoes.

Finally, the most formidable barrier was the CSS Tennessee, a 209-foot-long ironclad ram. An impressive vessel encased in impenetrable metal, the Tennessee was under the command of Franklin Buchanan. Buchanan had spent nearly his entire life in the Navy. He had seen action in the Mexican War and had accompanied Commodore Matthew Perry on his voyage to open Japan to the outside world. Buchanan had resigned his commission at the outbreak of the Civil War and joined the Confederate Navy. On March 8, 1862, he commanded the Confederate ironclad Virginia in its attack on the Union fleet at Hampton Roads. Severe leg injuries sustained in the battle prevented him from participating in the fight between the Virginia and the Monitor on March 9. However, Buchanan had gained a reputation and the rank of admiral.

On the Union side was Rear Admiral David Glasgow Farragut. Born in 1801, Farragut had been adopted as a small child by Navy Captain David Porter. Porter used his influence to allow his young son to join the Navy as a midshipman at the age of nine. Farragut saw a great deal of action during the War of 1812, and he gained a reputation for bravery. Although he was born in Tennessee, Farragut remained loyal to the Union and gained command of the West Gulf Blockading Squadron. Farragut’s participation in the capture of New Orleans on April 29, 1862 gained him wide fame.

From America's Historical Newspapers. Click to open map in PDF.

Although he had wanted to attack Mobile Bay as early as 1862, Farragut could not secure the men and materials necessary for an attack for two years. By early August 1864, Farragut had a fleet of 14 wooden ships at his command, as well as four ironclad warships. Farragut also had soldiers under the command of General Gordon Granger for support. On August 4, 1864, Union troops landed on Dauphin Island at the mouth of Mobile Bay. Farragut would enter the bay the next morning.

The first Union ships through the bay were the ironclads. Farragut hoped they would draw the fire of the forts away from his wooden vessels. The remaining ships were lashed together in pairs, with the larger ships shielding smaller ships from fire. Farragut originally wanted his flagship, the Hartford, to take the lead, but was convinced that the Brooklyn, which had superior firepower and mine-clearing equipment, should go first.

Suddenly, one of the ironclad ships, the Tecumseh, struck a mine. With alarming rapidity, the ship sank with 93 members of her crew. The explosion terrified the captain of the Brooklyn, who brought his ship to a halt. The loss of momentum left the entire fleet exposed to the guns of Fort Morgan. Farragut, who was lashed in the rigging of the Hartford to get a better view of the battle, ordered the Hartford, and its partner the Metacomet, to break formation and sail directly through the torpedoes. When warned of the danger ahead, Farragut responded “Damn the torpedoes! Full speed ahead!” (Historians debate the exact wording of Farragut’s statement, or indeed if he said anything at all.) The other ships followed, passing through unharmed. While most of the mines malfunctioned due to exposure to the elements, a few remained active. Several days later, explosions killed sailors tasked with clearing the mines from the bay. 

From America's Historical Newspapers. Click to open full article in PDF.

Once inside the bay, Farragut’s fleet attacked Buchanan’s fleet. In addition to the CSS Tennessee, Mobile was defended by the Selma, the Gaines, and the Morgan. Farragut’s forces proved superior, capturing the Selma and scuttling the Gaines. The Tennessee attempted to ram several of the vessels but retreated to Fort Morgan to regroup. Safely inside the bay, the Union ships anchored and assessed the damage to their fleet. After a brief interval, the Tennessee again confronted Farragut’s forces. Union ships fired and rammed the Tennessee, but the ship’s armor protected it from damage. However, the Tennessee was slow in the water and was taking on many ships alone. Eventually, the Union ships struck the chains that were used to steer the Tennessee. With Buchanan injured and the ship unable to maneuver, the Tennessee surrendered. 

A Confederate account from America's Historical Newspapers. Click to open full article in PDF.

Although the Confederate fleet had been defeated, the forts guarding the bay remained. Fort Powell was the first to fall when the Confederates abandoned it on August 6. Fort Gaines held out slightly longer, but it was surrounded by the Union army and suffered bombardment from Farragut’s ironclad monitors. Confederate Colonel Charles Anderson surrendered Fort Gaines on August 8. This surrender infuriated General Richard Page, the commander of Fort Morgan. For the next two weeks, the Union army built trenches around Fort Morgan, while monitors shelled the Confederate forces. Finally, a full-scale attack on Fort Morgan, consisting of the Union fleet, army guns and even the captured CSS Tennessee, began on August 22. Fort Morgan was badly battered and portions caught fire. Unable to resist any longer, General Page surrendered at 6 am on August 23, 1864.

Farragut and the Union forces succeeded in capturing Mobile Bay. However, the city of Mobile would not fall until the following year. Farragut had won a victory, but at the high cost of 315 casualties. The capture of Mobile Bay proved to be a great boost for Union morale. Farragut’s bravery and strategy made him famous. In 1866, he became the first person appointed to the rank of admiral in the United States Navy.

From America's Historical Newspapers. Click to open full article in PDF.

For more information or to arrange a product trial of America’s Historical Newspapers, please contact readexmarketing@readex.com.

Be Sociable, Share!

Just Browsing: Cool Items from the Past

Tuesday, June 14th, 2011

One of the joys of browsing American historical newspapers is discovering the unexpected from around the world. Take this photograph, for example, of a car being dragged across a Siberian river during the Peking-to-Paris race in 1907:

Source: Cleveland Plain Dealer; Date: Aug. 18, 1907; Page: 29

Or this photo of European ostrich racing in the 1920s:

Source: Cleveland Plain Dealer, Date: Sept. 28, 1924; Page 76

And then this picture of the same race in a different newspaper, which notes that these jockeys couldn’t get their birds to go!

Source: Springfield Republican; Date: Oct. 1, 1924; Page: 18

While you expect to see photos of the stars of stage and screen in the newspapers, this staged image of Elsie Janis is quite amusing.

Source: Boston Journal; Date: Dec. 6, 1906; Page: 7

Source: Farmer's Cabinet; Date: Jan. 31, 1856

Finally, consider this story, reprinted in the Farmer’s Cabinet of Amherst, New Hampshire on January 31, 1856. Credited at the bottom to Bayard Taylor’s Letters, it’s a first-person narrative of the dinnertime entertainment provided to Mr. Taylor and a companion during a “sojourn” in India:

“We were dining together in his bungalow, when a wandering Hindoo minstrel came along with his mandolin, and requested permission to sit upon the verandah and play for us.

“I was desirous of hearing some of the Indian airs, and my host therefore ordered him to perform during dinner. He tuned the wires of his mandolin, extemporized a prelude which had some very familiar passages, and to my complete astonishment began singing “Get out of the way, Old Dan Tucker!” The old man seemed to enjoy my surprise and followed up his performance with “Oh, Susannah,” “Buffalo Gals,” and other choice Ethiopian melodies, all of which he sang with admirable spirit and correctness.”

That’s cultural diffusion!

Be Sociable, Share!

You are what you eat? Maybe, maybe not

Friday, June 3rd, 2011

Source: Morning Oregonian, Feb. 5, 1910

Low-fat? Low-calorie? Low-carb?

Headlines seem to grab the public’s interest every day with warnings about what and what not to eat. With food-related health issues and rising obesity rates getting so much attention in the United States and around the world, it is tempting to think that mankind’s struggles with diet are new. But of course they aren’t!

Source: Rising Sun (Kansas City, MO), May 26, 1905. Click to open in PDF.

Immortality—or at least the extension of natural life—has always been a goal of mankind, and links between health and diet have long been subjects of debate.

One of the world’s oldest food controversies centers not on carbohydrates, trans-fats or sugar. Instead, it’s a bit more basic: to eat or not to eat meat? Historical proponents of a vegetable diet have included such famous figures as Benjamin Franklin, Isaac Newton and Mahatma Gandhi, who all professed belief in non-animal diets at one time or another. In fact, claims have been made that herbivores live longer and have greater endurance than those whose diet includes meat.

Champions of a vegetable-only diet have looked to nutrition to not only improve their health but to predict and change their temperament as well. Been a bit cranky lately? Perhaps onions are to blame. Enjoying Popeye-like strength? You must be eating your spinach.

“Women who eat egg-plant become jealous. Carrots are conductive to a quick temper. String beans encourage profanity. Potatoes lead to laziness and spinach to activity. Onions invite a perpetual grouch, and green peas often lead to the divorce court by arousing the flirtatious instinct.”

Source: Duluth News Tribune (MN), April 10, 1910. Click to open in PDF.

One faction of vegetarians proclaims that killing animals for food is a form of murder. In this view, the taking of a life, any life, is in opposition to moral values and religious tenets. In the Duluth News Tribune article above, the recent president of the Chicago Vegetarian society claims that vegetable-based diets could eradicate human vices:

“Drunkenness and cruelty would be unknown. War would be unknown. There would be less sickness and less poverty. There would be little excuse for the existence of jails, and insane asylums would cease to exist.” 

Source: Trenton Sunday Advertiser (NJ), May 8, 1960

Health, mood changes and morality are but a few of the reasons that vegetarianism has enjoyed waves of popularity throughout history. Another recurring theme in abstinence from meat is simple: economics. Raising or purchasing meat can be expensive. Many allege that Benjamin Franklin’s vegetable diet was never a health-related choice but simply due to his penny-pinching ways.

Others have even predicted that the world’s population explosion would force a meatless society. Meat would someday become a luxury afforded by the elite few.

Source: Philadelphia Inquirer (PA), June 19, 1915

And so the debate continues.

Are meat eaters more likely to be peaceful, good natured, genteel folk? Maybe, maybe not – but if they are, it’s surely not a by-product of diet alone. Does a meatless diet translate into health benefits? The jury is still out on that hotly debated topic. As for economics? In these budget-conscious days, there are many proponents of cost-savings through vegetable diets.

“Yes, fresh produce generally costs more than canned or frozen, and organic produce and products cost more than their chemically grown counterparts.

“But when you compare the cost of standing rib roast or ground beef, tofu and even shiitake mushrooms look like a bargain.”

[Source: NewsBank--The Versatile Vegetarian: No-meat diet usually means savings, though quality doesn't come cheap, The Atlanta Journal and The Atlanta Constitution; Thursday, January 11, 1996]

Today, with no clear-cut answers, the choice to forgo meat is still very much an individual one; the reasons provided by vegetarians for their dietary choices are as varied as ever. Some have even put their own twist on vegetarianism by deciding NOT to decide. Flexitarians are those who are unwilling to adopt a meat-free life but still recognize the health and, often, budget savings associated with vegetable diets. They believe in cutting back the number of times meat is eaten and when, but do not eliminate it from their diets completely.

“Identifying yourself as an eater used to be simple. You either ate meat, or you didn’t.

“Now? Maybe you eat meat, but only certain kinds or only on certain days – or even certain hours. Or you don’t eat meat … except when you do.”

[Source: NewsBank--The occasional carnivore: Flexitarian eaters are finding they really can have it both ways, Charlotte Observer, The (NC), March 2, 2011]

Be Sociable, Share!