Posts Tagged ‘The Readex Report’

“A Dastardly Outrage”: Kate Brown and the Washington-Alexandria Railroad Case

Wednesday, June 8th, 2011

[Kate Brown, a U.S. Senate laundress promoted to retiring room attendant, is most notable for winning the 1873 Supreme Court Case Railroad Company v. Brown. This spring Brown was the focus of a winning entry in a research competition sponsored by the Oxford African American Studies Center and the Gilder Lehrman Institute of American History. That winning entry on Brown, which will be published in the online African American National Biography, was researched and written by McLean (VA) High School students Brian Tong and Theodore Lin, who utilized the U.S. Congressional Serial Set among other sources. The article on Kate Brown below was written by Betty K. Koed, Assistant Historian in the U.S. Senate Historical Office. It appeared in the September 2008 issue of The Readex Report, where it was published with permission from Unum, a newsletter published by the Office of the Secretary of the United States Senate.]

As a Senate employee “in charge of the ladies’ retiring room,” Kate Brown worked hard, washing towels and laundering curtains. More than one senator commented on her “lady-like character” and described her as “an educated, intelligent, respectable, and to all appearance refined woman.” Although not known as a rebel or a troublemaker, on a chilly afternoon in February 1868 Kate Brown rebelled and stirred up a legal storm that went all the way to the Supreme Court.

It was nearly 3:00 p.m. on February 8, 1868, when Kate Brown pulled out her return ticket and stepped aboard a train to take her from Alexandria, Virginia, where she had been visiting a sick relative, back home to Washington, D.C. With her foot still on the step, Brown was accosted by the rail line’s private police officer, who called from the platform that she must take the other car. “This car will do,” the 28 year-old Brown replied quietly and stepped inside the train. At that point, as Brown later told a Senate committee investigating the incident, “the policeman ran up and told me I could not ride in that car… he said that car was for ladies.” Of course, Kate Brown was a lady, but she was also African American.

Source: U.S. Congressional Serial Set, 1817-1994. Click to open in PDF.

Because of her race, the policeman insisted that Brown was not “allowed to ride in that car anyhow; never was and never would be.” Not one to be deterred, Brown responded to the irate man: “I bought my ticket to go to Washington in this car, and I am going in it; before I leave this car I will suffer death.” A violent altercation followed, resulting in Brown being physically ejected from the train, thrown onto the platform, and dragged along the pavement. Fortunately another Senate employee, B. H. Hinds, a clerk for the Committee on Public Buildings and Grounds, arrived on the scene and came to her assistance. Hinds tried to convince Brown to ride in the “colored car,” but the presence of many disorderly men in the car frightened her. “I then went to her and told her that if she would get into the car,” Hinds explained to the committee, “I would go with her and see that she would not be molested.” Brown agreed, and the two traveled together to Washington where she sought medical help. The injuries she sustained kept her in bed for weeks to come.

The case quickly gained attention. “A dastardly outrage was perpetrated in Alexandria on Saturday afternoon,” commented one newspaper, “which is justly considered a disgrace to this age of civilization.” Senators Charles Sumner and Justin Morrill demanded an investigation and called for reparations. In the days that followed, the Senate Committee on the District of Columbia heard testimony from eyewitnesses to the violent incident, officials of the Alexandria and Washington Railroad Company, and from Brown’s doctor. Too badly injured to appear before the committee, Kate Brown gave testimony from her sick bed to committee chairman James Harlan.

In time, Brown sued the railroad company. The legal aspects of the case rested, in part, on the fact that the railroad’s de facto segregation policy was unevenly enforced. On the trip from Washington to Alexandria no such policy was in place, but in Alexandria the railroad’s management hired private officers to enforce segregation. Segregated trains were the norm throughout many states, but in the case of this particular rail line it was illegal. The 1863 congressional charter authorizing the railroad included—at the insistence of Charles Sumner—one key sentence: “And provided, also, That no person shall be excluded from the cars on account of race.” Since the railroad provided two identical cars on the line, the company responded with an argument of “separate but equal.”

The District of Columbia courts awarded $1,500 in damages to Brown. The rail company appealed, and the case eventually went before the Supreme Court. On November 17, 1873, in an opinion delivered by Justice David Davis, the Court held that the 1863 charter remained in force and that racial segregation on the line was not allowed under the charter. Davis dismissed the company’s “separate but equal” argument as “an ingenious attempt to evade a compliance with the obvious meaning of the requirement” of the 1863 charter and decided in favor of Kate Brown.

Brown remained a Senate employee until 1881. Except for the occasional footnote to “Railroad Company v. Brown” in legal histories, her act of rebellion has largely been forgotten; just one of many courageous attempts at civil disobedience that eventually fueled the civil rights movement of the mid-20th century. A growing interest in the history of Capitol Hill workers has brought new attention to the old story, however, and just recently the Congressional Black Associates honored Brown by naming one of its “Trailblazer Awards” in her honor.

Editor’s Note: Sources for the author’s research include the Report from the U.S. Congressional Serial Set on “the facts connected with the forcible ejection from the cars of the Alexandria and Washington Railroad of one of the employees of the Senate, on account of race…” An excerpt from this 26-page documentReport of the Senate Committee on the District of Columbia, June 17, 1868 (No. 131, 40th Congress, 2nd Session)offers this testimony from Mrs. Kate Brown.

Be Sociable, Share!

Avoiding Errors, Fopperies, and Follies: How to be a Good Wife

Tuesday, May 17th, 2011

 [This article by Elizabeth Hopwood, a graduate student in the English Department at Northeastern University, first appeared in the February 2011 issue of The Readex Report.]

Anyone who’s planned a wedding has probably dealt with unsolicited advice: everything from what drinks to serve, how long (or short) the ceremony should be, how the couple should deal with name changes, and, not least, rules and tips for creating, maintaining, and sustaining a successful marriage.

Although I tried to compartmentalize my upcoming wedding plans far, far away from the bounds of the English department and scholarly research, it just so happened that the peculiarities of wedding/wedded life intersected, oddly enough, with archival research. What follows are portions of a news/opinion piece submitted to The New-England Weekly Journal (Containing the Most Remarkable Occurrences Foreign & Domestic) on February 15, 1731. It is part one of a two-parter called “A Letter to a Lady on her Marriage.” Written by a gentleman who was concerned with communicating ideals of conduct and virtue for the young New England woman, the article lists several follies that the wedded woman must necessarily avoid in order to make “a good Figure in the World.” Brides-to-be, be aware: perhaps we can learn a thing or two about how we ought to govern ourselves after we’ve snagged that husband.

I read this piece first as a scholar and then later, surrounded by wedding invitation samples, etiquette books, and a growing guest list, as a bride. Each reading led me to consider the ever-increasing and sometimes noisy discourse of feminine instruction, and I wondered how much has changed and what has remained the same. I wondered what would happen if instructions from an eighteenth-century conduct manual were translated, interpreted, and applied to the twenty-first century. What follows each gentlemanly tip are this writer’s humble translations, boiled down into easy-to-remember (and certainly sarcastic) “do’s” and “don’ts”.

I excerpt:

Madam,

…You are beginning to enter into a Course of Life, where you will want much advise to direct you from falling into many Errors, Fopperies, and Follies to which your Sex is Subject…It must be therefore your Business to Qualify yourself with those Offices wherein I will not fail to be your director, as long as I think you shall deserve it, by letting you know how you are to Act, and what you ought to Avoid: and beware of despising or neglecting my Instructions, whereon will depend not only your making a good Figure in the World, but your own real Happiness, as well as that of the Person who ought to be the dearest to you.

 I must therefore desire you in the first place, to be very slow in changing the Modest Behavior of a Virgin…if the Votes of Wise Men were gathered, a very great Majority would be in favour of those Ladies, who after they were enter’d into that State, rather choose to double their Portion of Modesty and Reservedness.

Tip #1, Do NOT Bring Sexy Back.

I must likewise warn you strictly against the least degree of Fondness to your Husband before any Witness whatsoever, even before your nearest Relations, or the very Maids of your Chamber.

Tip #2, No Canoodling in Front of the Help!

…I should likewise advise you to differ in practice from those Ladies who Affect abundance of uneasiness while their Husbands are abroad, start with every knock at the Door, and ring the Bell incessantly for the Servants to let in their Master; will not Eat a bit at Dinner or Supper if the Husband happens to stay out, and receive him at his return with such a Medley of Chiding, and Kindness, and Catechising him where he has been, that a Shrew from Billingsgate would be a more easy and eligible Companion.

Tip #3, While Your Husband Is Away, You are Allowed to Stay in Pajama Pants and Watch “Real Housewives” while Eating an Entire Box of Mac and Cheese for Dinner. But Don’t Vex the Servants. And, Please, No Nagging!

…the Satyricial part of Mankind will needs believe that it is not Impossible to be very fine and very filthy, and that the Capacities of a Lady are sometimes apt to fall short in Cultivating Cleanliness and Finery together: I shall only add, upon so tender a Subject what a pleasant Gentleman said concerning a silly Woman of Quality: that nothing could make her Supportable but cutting off her Head, for his Ears were Offended by her Tongue, and his Nose by her Hair and Teeth.

Tip #4, Be Sweet in Smell, Sweet in Words.

This writer describes eighteenth-century marriage as an institution that values virtue, hygiene, and modesty. With the popularity and prevalence of conduct manuals and articles, this gentleman’s marital advice was yet another voice of the many shaping and constructing the role of wives in the domestic sphere.

I can joke to my fellow brides-to-be, “Go forth with this advice, and be successful wives!” But in reality, aren’t we consistently being inundated with modern versions of the conduct manual—within the pages of glossy wedding magazines, on wedding web sites, and even on television shows? (Please note, I am not advocating taking advice from Bridezillas, reality dating shows, or any sitcom featuring the trope of the exasperated yet attractive mom and her bulging, bumbling husband.) What marriage advice have you received? And I wonder…what advice would you give to a young gentleman, on his marriage?

Source: “A Letter to a Lady on her Marriage.” New-England Weekly Journal, Boston: 1731. NewsBank/Readex, Database: America’s Historical Newspapers.

About the Author

Elizabeth Hopwood is a working on her Ph.D. in English at Northeastern University. She has blogged about her wedding planning experience at WeddingBee.com under the pseudonym “Ms. Potato Chips.” Special acknowledgement to colleague Shun Kiang for bringing this archival piece to her attention and for many discussions about its interest and importance.

Be Sociable, Share!

Latest Newsletter Available: The Readex Report (April 2011)

Wednesday, April 13th, 2011

In our new issue, you’ll find the deliciously rich history of chocolate; cavalier attitudes toward a deadly plague in a Brazilian port; forgotten battles of the Revolutionary War; and the intriguing rise and demise of the advertising card.

Chocolate: A Readex Sampler

By Louis E. Grivetti

Professor of Nutrition, Emeritus, at the University of California, Davis, and co-editor of Chocolate: History, Culture, and Heritage (Wiley, 2009)

Finding Fatalism and Overconfidence in a Cruel Port: The Bubonic Plague’s First Appearance in Brazil

By Ian Olivo Read

Author of The Hierarchies of Slavery in Santos, Brazil, 1822-1889 (Stanford University Press, forthcoming)

The Importance of Newspapers in Chronicling the American Revolution

By Norman Desmarais

Author of Battlegrounds of Freedom and The Guide to the American Revolutionary War in Canada and New England

The Development of the American Advertising Card

By Bruce D. Roberts

19th-century advertising card expert and author of Clipper Ship Sailing Cards (2007) and Mechanical Bank Trade Cards (2008)

Subscribe today to receive the September 2011 issue in your inbox. Browse previous issues in our archive. If you would like to contribute or suggest an article, please write to The Readex Report editor by emailing readexreport@readex.com.

Be Sociable, Share!

Writing the David Ruggles Biography: Newspapers Help Complete the Portrait of a Radical Black Abolitionist

Monday, February 21st, 2011

 [This article by Graham Russell Gao Hodges, George Dorland Langdon Jr. Professor of History and Africana & Latin American Studies, Colgate University first appeared in the February 2011 issue of The Readex Report.]

David Ruggles (1810-1849) was a brilliant, intrepid, multi-talented soul who devoted his time and health to “practical abolitionism.” This term, Ruggles argued, meant that abolitionists should not just philosophize about the day when slavery would end, but strive to help the everyday victims of human bondage. 

In Ruggles’ home city of New York, such assistance included blocking kidnappers who stole young black children from the streets under the pretense that they were fugitive slaves. It meant providing succor for self-emancipated slaves. Frederick Douglass arrived in New York on September 3, 1838, penniless, lonely, and frightened. He spent a night sleeping among the barrels on the docks of the harbor. A kind sailor took him to Ruggles’ house where he learned about anti-slavery activities, was married to his fiancé, and then was sent off to New Bedford, Massachusetts armed with a five-dollar bill and a letter of recommendation.

Such support raised Douglass to become one of America’s greatest leaders; Ruggles’ actions became taproots of the famous Underground Railroad. Ruggles watched New York’s port to see if illegal slave traders dropped anchor; when they did he had the captains arrested and the enslaved freed. Ruggles worked tirelessly as the secretary and public face of the New York Committee of Vigilance, the organization for practical abolitionism. Ruggles was also a fervent writer of pamphlets and letters to radical newspapers, operated a black lending library and anti-slavery bookshop, and edited the nation’s first black magazine, the Mirror of Liberty. After his health broke, he moved in 1841 to Northampton, Massachusetts where he continued his Underground Railroad work, became a hydrotherapist, and opened a hospital to treat patients.

After Ruggles’ death in 1849, the famous abolitionist William Lloyd Garrison proclaimed, “his biography has yet to be written.” In 1998, I agreed to write a Ruggles’ biography for the University of North Carolina Press, and in 1999 I received a short-term fellowship at the American Antiquarian Society in Worcester, Massachusetts to research its massive newspaper, book and manuscript holdings. One of the joys of such fellowships is the camaraderie one finds with other scholars working on projects in early American history and literature. Together we labored over ancient newspapers, churned microfilm machines, and pored over tiny scratches of the handwriting of famous and obscure early Americans. At night we talked about our findings and forged lasting friendships. There was one computer in the house where we lived, but few of us truly understood how to use it.

I left Worcester laden with microfilm pages and piles of notes about Ruggles’ articles and letters. I had worked so fast that later I could not always read my own handwriting. Years passed and I became involved in other book projects. Ruggles still awaited his biographer.

Fast forward to 2007. My publisher was tiring of my excuses and openly wondering if they would ever get a manuscript from me. Life no longer allowed me to spend weeks in Worcester. My wife, for one, was pregnant with our twin boys and soon they would need most of my time. So travel for research was out. Fortunately I worked at a college that subscribed to the America’s Historical Newspapers database. I could go to the school library, log on to its computers, and punch out fresh copies of all the Ruggles articles that I had labored to uncover over eight years before at the American Antiquarian Society. They numbered over two hundred.

Searching under Ruggles’ name, initials, meetings of the New York Committee of Vigilance, and by looking at the careers of his associates, I was able to find far more about him than I had previously. Unforeseen networks emerged. By connecting names in newspaper articles around New York State and New England with lists of subscribers to his magazine, I discerned lengthy cords of conspirators willing to help fugitive slaves Ruggles sent along. As Readex added new titles and extended the dates of its coverage, I found items that were unimaginable to me. How else would I ever have located an obituary published right after Ruggles’ death in December 1849 in a Milwaukee newspaper? The writer lamented Ruggles’ passing, noting that “he was a warm-hearted, able man, and an untiring friend of his own (the colored) race.”

Another insight came from discovery of how newspapers across the country reprinted original stories from a single source. I had known about these early wire services before but became fascinated by how reports of Ruggles’ activities were repeated in media chains across the Northeast and Midwest. Some even cropped up in the South. Long before Frederick Douglass had become a household name, readers in Missouri, Louisiana, Georgia, Maryland, Massachusetts, and Maine could follow, applaud, or condemn Ruggles’ exploits. As my personal life became wonderfully complicated with the birth of my sons, my intellectual odyssey into David Ruggles’ life broadened without leaving the library. While such searches can never replace the friendships gained at the American Antiquarian Society and other archives, they offer invaluable assistance to time-pressed authors. Thanks in large part to America’s Historical Newspapers the biography of David Ruggles is now at hand.

[Editor's note: In 2011 Readex will begin releasing African American Periodicals, 1825-1995—the inaugural collection in America's Historical Periodicals, a new Archive of Americana series. That collection will include extremely rare issues of the Mirror of Liberty, published in New York by David Ruggles, as well as more than 150 other African American periodicals.]

About the Author

Graham Russell Gao Hodges is the George Dorland Langdon Jr. Professor of History and Africana & Latin American Studies at Colgate University. He is author or editor of more than a dozen books. In March 2010, the University of North Carolina Press published David Ruggles: A Radical Black Abolitionist and the Underground Railroad in New York City. Other recent publications include Chains and Freedom: The Life and Adventure of Peter Wheeler: A Colored Man Yet Living, A Slave in Chains, A Sailor in the Deep, and a Sinner at the Cross (edited and with an introduction by Graham Russell Hodges, University of Alabama Press, 2009); Friends of Liberty: Thomas Jefferson, Thaddeus Kosciusko, and Agrippa Hull (co-authored with Gary Nash, Basic Books, 2008); and Taxi! A Cultural History of the New York City Cabdriver (Johns Hopkins University Press, 2007).

Be Sociable, Share!

New Issue Available: The Readex Report (February 2011)

Tuesday, February 15th, 2011

In our latest issue, you’ll find an overlooked lion of abolitionism; a humorous commentary on a dated matrimonial primer; unsung talents from the golden age of radio; and a fresh conversation with a Beat Generation icon.

Writing the David Ruggles Biography: Newspapers Help Complete the Portrait of a Radical Black Abolitionist 

By Graham Russell Gao Hodges, George Dorland Langdon Jr. Professor of History and Africana & Latin American Studies, Colgate University

Avoiding Errors, Fopperies, and Follies: How to be a Good Wife

By Elizabeth Hopwood, Graduate Student, English Department, Northeastern University

Early Radio Broadcasting: Solving Mysteries with America’s Historical Newspapers

By Donna L. Halper, Assistant Professor of Communication, Lesley University

Talking News with Carolyn Cassady: A Conversation with the Matriarch of the Beat Generation

By David Whittaker, Writer and Content Specialist, NewsBank

Subscribe today to receive the April 2011 issue in your inbox. Browse previous issues in our archive. If you would like to contribute or suggest an article, contact The Readex Report editor by emailing readexreport@readex.com.

Be Sociable, Share!

A Light on Past Lives: The Illuminating Effects of Electronic Resources on Biographical Research

Monday, December 13th, 2010

[This post by James McGrath Morris, author of Pulitzer: A Life in Politics, Print, and Power (HarperCollins, 2010), first appeared in the November 2010 issue of The Readex Report.]

The most revolutionary change in biography writing is the advent of digitized newspapers. Unlike microfilm, which simply reproduced newspapers on film, these new electronic records provide what we biographers and historians have long dreamed for—a means of finding a needle in the haystack.

Let me explain. For years folks like me have been using the great newspaper collections in our nation’s libraries, archives, and other repositories. The contemporaneous accounts are like gold. But as with the pursuit of this precious metal, we have not been able to mine all of it. In fact, using our previously inadequate research tools, many of the best veins have remained untapped.

Essentially our choice was to read every page of a newspaper’s run or use dates to guide our research. So, for instance, if I wanted to discover what was said about a particular artist, I might have looked at issues of a newspaper published around the opening date of an exhibit. But if an art critic wrote a review several weeks later, the likelihood was that I would miss it.

Lacking dates, I could alternatively turn to a newspaper index such as the one produced by the venerable New York Times. However, unbeknownst to many researchers, this index is not complete. In keeping with the newspaper’s motto “All the News Fit to Print,” its indexers only included those items they judged fit to be indexed. A lot never earned a reference. (more…)

Be Sociable, Share!

Newest Issue of The Readex Report Now Available: November 2010

Tuesday, November 23rd, 2010

In this issue: how digitized newspapers shine a brilliant light on past lives; the profound impact of religion on African-American identity; the Boston Tea Party as perceived by both Colonialists and those loyal to the Crown; and the humor, hype and horror behind the mysterious minced pie. (more…)

Be Sociable, Share!

New issue of The Readex Report available

Monday, September 27th, 2010

In the September 2010 issue: the dark descent of an American literary icon; using 19th-century government documents to right wrongs against Native Americans; and a private collector’s zeal adds depth and diversity to an eminent historical collection. (more…)

Be Sociable, Share!